教育王國

標題: Is Pokfulam 余X強紀念第二中學 good or bad? [打印本頁]

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-3 00:45 標題: Is Pokfulam 余X強紀念第二中學 good or bad?

Hi,
I would like to know is Is Pokfulam 余X強紀念第二中學 good or bad? What is the banding and is student conduct good or not good? Any advise? Thanks

[ 本帖最後由 Ving 於 10-12-8 10:10 編輯 ]

作者: LittleKidult 時間: 10-12-3 09:16

你應該不是住南區吧...................

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-3 10:52

Hi,
LittleKidult, yes I am living in 南區 apleichau, what's the relationship with whether this school good or not, please tell.

原帖由 LittleKidult 於 10-12-3 09:16 發表
你應該不是住南區吧...................

作者: LittleKidult 時間: 10-12-3 10:57

可以的話, 不要選

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-3 11:26

So, what's the problem? academic problem? conduct problem? teaching staff problem? or else what's the banding of this school? please advise

原帖由 LittleKidult 於 10-12-3 10:57 發表
可以的話, 不要選

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-4 16:09

Any idea if the school is good or bad or any experience on it. thx

作者: 2008mum2008 時間: 10-12-5 01:12

余振強紀念第二中學 is band 3.

作者: tictactoe 時間: 10-12-5 08:00

如果你住南區，理應知余是一間著名的BAND 3學校

原帖由 Ving 於 10-12-3 10:52 發表
Hi,
LittleKidult, yes I am living in 南區 apleichau, what's the relationship with whether this school good or not, please tell.

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-5 13:32

Hi tictactoe,
Because my only children is still small and I have moved to 南區 not long. So I want to plan for the path to secondary school. But some say 余 is not good. I want to know if this is just bias or real thing. Do you have any friends or relatives on it having bad experience? Thanks

原帖由 tictactoe 於 10-12-5 08:00 發表
如果你住南區，理應知余是一間著名的BAND 3學校

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-5 14:04

So for secondary school, is it still band 1 to band 5? So, if for band 3, does it mean still not really such bad, please advise.

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 10-12-5 22:11

just google the news relate to this school:

poor management:
余振強二中續聘拍裙底教師校長認聘任疏忽沒查案底

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100105/4/fz1a.html

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-5 22:38

Thanks, but other than poor management, what's about the academic and conduct? So, is it band 3 means the worst?

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 10-12-5 22:11 發表
just google the news relate to this school:

poor management:
余振強二中續聘拍裙底教師校長認聘任疏忽沒查案底

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100105/4/fz1a.html

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 10-12-6 10:04

according to a mami of BK:

18區中學banding排名--09年資料由會員khmama搜集分析

band3尾
余振強紀念第二中學 (推算今年6科14分佔8.75%)

I will never consider this school for my children.

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/vie ... &extra=page%3D1

南區分析

南區有2間英中-嘉諾撒聖心書院同聖公會呂明才中學. 聖心今年第一階段有3個位剩, 而上年6科14分係71.04%, 睇佢再前兩年既會考, 14分大約係80%, 屬BAND1頭, 上年明顯特別差. 而呂明才上年14分係42.8%, 屬BAND2頭. 下面係推算既6科14分比率.

band1頭
嘉諾撒聖心書院 (上年6科14分佔71.08%)

band2頭
聖公會呂明才中學 (上年6科14分佔42.8%)

band2中
香港真光書院 (推算今年6科14分佔31.88%)

band2尾
香港仔浸信會呂明才書院 (推算今年6科14分佔27.5%)
聖伯多祿中學 (推算今年6科14分佔20.63%)
嘉諾撒培德書院 (推算今年6科14分佔20%)

band3頭
新會商會陳白沙紀念中學 (推算今年6科14分佔17.5%)

band3尾
余振強紀念第二中學 (推算今年6科14分佔8.75%)
培英中學 (推算今年6科14分佔5%)
明愛胡振中中學 (推算今年6科14分佔4.38%)
香港仔工業學校 (推算今年6科14分佔4%)
明愛莊月明中學 (推算今年6科14分佔1.88%)
保良局慧妍雅集書院 (無資料,不設中六)
香港航海學校 (無資料,不設中六)

以上資料只供參考.

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-6 11:04

Hi Sumyeema1,
Thanks for your information.
But for boys in net 18, other than lui ming choi, seems not much choice. So, would like to know more about 余振強紀念第二中學 as backup.
So, if for this school, how's about the students' conduct. As I only know that academic is not so good only. Any friends or relatives experience here?

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 10-12-6 10:04 發表
according to a mami of BK:

18區中學banding排名--09年資料由會員khmama搜集分析

band3尾
余振強紀念第二中學 (推算今年6科14分佔8.75%)

I will never consider this school for my children.

http://forum.ed ...

作者: LittleKidult 時間: 10-12-6 11:46

其實點解講咁耐, 你都重想余振強紀念第二中學?
點解唔揀陳白沙做backup?
振強紀念第二中學成日聽到打交爭女既消息架啦, 香港仔工業又係成日打交.....
最好有時間咪食飯同放學時去睇下d學生出校門係點囉.

作者: Sumyeema1 時間: 10-12-6 12:30 標題: 回覆 15# LittleKidult 的文章

我都唔明，backup 都要揀間好 d 咖啦。

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-6 14:51

Thanks for sharing as I am new to this net 18 secondary schools and just don't want to bias on individual school, so would like to seek more advise.
So, seems that this is not a good school after discussions and I should not put it into consideration, right, thx.

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 10-12-6 12:30 發表
我都唔明，backup 都要揀間好 d 咖啦。

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 10-12-6 18:09

我細佬就係余記出黎(當然好多年前喇, 不過睇走勢似乎都係咁上下)
當年我細佬本來係讀陳X沙, 但陳校規較嚴, 我細佬又唔生性成日衰埋晒D遲到, 欠功課果D, 好快就俾人踢出校, 當時肯收佢既就只有余記
D仔真係幾曳的, 我細佬亦有一段好曳既日子(食煙夜蒲黑底果D), 反而而家大左至識唸返......
有得揀.......都係唔好揀喇

原帖由 Sumyeema1 於 10-12-6 12:30 PM 發表
我都唔明，backup 都要揀間好 d 咖啦。

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-6 21:26

想請教以前系咪band 5 男校，而家升le band 3 尾男女校

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 10-12-6 18:09 發表
我細佬就係余記出黎(當然好多年前喇, 不過睇走勢似乎都係咁上下)
當年我細佬本來係讀陳X沙, 但陳校規較嚴, 我細佬又唔生性成日衰埋晒D遲到, 欠功課果D, 好快就俾人踢出校, 當時肯收佢既就只有余記
D仔真係幾曳的, 我 ...

作者: 慧妮會員 時間: 10-12-6 21:54

原帖由 Ving 於 10-12-6 21:26 發表
想請教以前系咪band 5 男校，而家升le band 3 尾男女校

唔係升呢...係改咗制度...以前5個Level...而家得返三個Level...

作者: 慧妮會員 時間: 10-12-6 22:00

原帖由 LittleKidult 於 10-12-6 11:46 發表
其實點解講咁耐, 你都重想余振強紀念第二中學?
點解唔揀陳白沙做backup?
振強紀念第二中學成日聽到打交爭女既消息架啦, 香港仔工業又係成日打交.....
最好有時間咪食飯同放學時去睇下d學生出校門係點囉. ...

講真18net...backup選擇真係唔多...填到第五...六間已經填唔落手囉...如果真要填滿三十間都唔知點填...

作者: Sindy 時間: 10-12-7 00:27

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 10-12-6 18:09 發表
我細佬就係余記出黎(當然好多年前喇, 不過睇走勢似乎都係咁上下)
當年我細佬本來係讀陳X沙, 但陳校規較嚴, 我細佬又唔生性成日衰埋晒D遲到, 欠功課果D, 好快就俾人踢出校, 當時肯收佢既就只有余記
D仔真係幾曳的, 我 ...

我女係度讀預科,我都成日問佢學校係咪真係咁,佢就話,曳都曳唔到我地中六七啦.....所以我覺得呢間學校又唔係龍潭虎穴...但有得揀既話,呢間肯定唔係最好既選擇, 上排仲話請左個唔係咁好既老師....點唔好?自己上網睇下,我驚比人告.....

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-7 07:48

[其實錦講法咪冇樣好？我仲以為宗教學校點都吾會太差潻。既然錦，又真吾明政府資源分配，好的中學要佢縮班，而呢啲又要keep 住，好話吾好聴，讀完都吾知會吾會比人標纖左，咩浪費父母細路啲時間，雖然話津校吾駛學費。quote]原帖由 Sindy 於 10-12-7 00:27 發表

我女係度讀預科,我都成日問佢學校係咪真係咁,佢就話,曳都曳唔到我地中六七啦.....所以我覺得呢間學校又唔係龍潭虎穴...但有得揀既話,呢間肯定唔係最好既選擇, 上排仲話請左個唔係咁好既老師....點唔好?自己上網睇 ... [/quote]

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-8 09:27

第番尼段新聞，我又認韋錯不全在校長一個人，但他當然責無旁態，試問任何一個机構請人都會reference check，而佢地仲係請老師，雖要較高的道德標準，再講仲係公家錢，成間學校甘大吾通連似hr都冇？如果好似佢講話自行伸報，只表示尼間學校一豚糟，由上到下都係。 Sumyeema1 於 10-12-5 22:11 發表

just google the news relate to this school:

poor management:
余振強二中續聘拍裙底教師校長認聘任疏忽沒查案底

http://hk.news.yahoo.com/article/100105/4/fz1a.html [/quote]

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-8 09:31

[q如果錦推斷，分分鐘現任老師有冇底都係一個問號。uote]原帖由 Ving 於 10-12-8 09:27 發表

第番尼段新聞，我又認韋錯不全在校長一個人，但他當然責無旁態，試問任何一個机構請人都會reference check，而佢地仲係請老師，雖要較高的道德標準，再講仲係公家錢，成間學校甘大吾通連似hr都冇？如果好似佢講話自行伸報，只表示尼間 ... [/quote]

作者: Sindy 時間: 10-12-12 20:28 標題: 回復 2# Ving 的帖子

錯左又真係不在校長我覺得,但...佢查人有無案底?私隱黎喎......

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-13 10:00

But no matter whether the problem is headmaster Yxp himself or the school management. As a whole, the outsider only feels that the school is a mess, loosen policy, even in hiring teachers, whereas teacher should be an important asset in school. Not even to say other things academic, conduct, ECA etc

作者: Sindy 時間: 10-12-16 21:48

原帖由 Ving 於 10-12-13 10:00 發表
But no matter whether the problem is headmaster Yxp himself or the school management. As a whole, the outsider only feels that the school is a mess, loosen policy, even in hiring teachers, whereas tea ...

老師我覺得都係盡心教學生架喎....

作者: Ving 時間: 10-12-22 00:06

The problem is that when people evaluate whether a school is good (band 1 top) or bad (band 3 tail) is based on fact, how many good stuffs and bad stuffs about the school. Take an example if "the school" has bad student conduct, poor public exam academic result, worse school management, poor school image. Then no matter you have some good teachers, people will just treat this as a bad school.
This is just personal view and if not agree, please discuss.

作者: Sindy 時間: 10-12-22 01:22

原帖由 Ving 於 10-12-22 00:06 發表
The problem is that when people evaluate whether a school is good (band 1 top) or bad (band 3 tail) is based on fact, how many good stuffs and bad stuffs about the school. Take an example if "the scho ...

即使入到間band one學校,老師衰既話,唔負責住,亦對學生絶對無好處,事可以兩面睇,唔係話你講得唔啱,但唔係絶對

我女呀,數學麻麻地....個校長就話會幫佢,到個數學老師,仲係副校添...彩你都儍,一味應酬你,話有進步呀,佢OK呀...咪浪費左小朋友時間囉,我情願你話唔得閒搞好過...

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)