教育王國

標題: 蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒 [打印本頁]

作者: stseng 時間: 10-11-30 21:56 標題: 蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒

Which one is better?

作者: kochiman2004 時間: 10-11-30 22:26

原帖由 stseng 於 10-11-30 21:56 發表
Which one is better?

柴米 because it's nearly topest one primary school in HK East

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-1 17:26

I heard that 蘇浙小學 academic level is higher than 柴灣聖米迦勒...... is this true?

作者: 小佳 時間: 10-12-2 17:24

有認同, 學術成績來說, 蘇浙在東區的小學中是姣姣者. 校風也很好, 只是功課較多.

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-1 17:26 發表
I heard that 蘇浙小學 academic level is higher than 柴灣聖米迦勒...... is this true?

作者: GIPW 時間: 10-12-2 23:43

原帖由 stseng 於 10-11-30 21:56 發表
Which one is better?

I will vote for 蘇浙

作者: ap_cheung 時間: 10-12-3 09:27

蘇浙入band1達8至9成, 而柴米約4至5成,
但蘇浙需學費, 柴米不需學費.

原帖由 stseng 於 10-11-30 21:56 發表
Which one is better?

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-3 23:43

原帖由 ap_cheung 於 10-12-3 09:27 發表
蘇浙入band1達8至9成, 而柴米約4至5成,
但蘇浙需學費, 柴米不需學費.

Noted KCS is a traditional school, it is amazing to know that they are using activity approach teaching method from their website. "本校一至六年級推行活動教學，使學生通過遊戲，實踐及活動，享受學習的樂趣。培養學生自發、自覺的精神，發揮他們的潛能

。"
Is that true?
Do students still have pressure in school life, eg homework, passages memorising, dictations, tests and exams.
How do teachers help students with their study?

作者: mimi1102 時間: 10-12-4 10:00

KCS 係一間出名谷的傳統小學, 背書默書我諗應該走唔甩, 英文讀深一年, 一開學冇耐就要英默, 中默. 但係大部份小朋友都可以响學校完成功課.
係有壓力, 但係好多小朋友都讀得好開心. 聽過有家長話, 佢每日都好小功課 (因為可以响學校完成), 平時好少理佢, 不過佢又讀得唔差.
讀 kcs 有一樣可以保証的, 就係普通話一定得.

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-3 23:43 發表

Noted KCS is a traditional school, it is amazing to know that they are using activity approach teaching method from their website. "本校一至六年級推行活動教學，使學生通過遊戲，實踐及活動，享受學習的樂趣。 ...

作者: tzehin 時間: 10-12-4 18:15

My niece is studing in KCC. She is enjoying school life very much. Very good academic training.

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-4 21:18

This sounds amazing - like a dream school:
"出名谷, 有壓力" but at the same time, "好多小朋友都讀得好開心. 每日都好小功課 (因為可以响學校完成)"

Do you know how do KCS manage it? Is it because it combines traditional and activity-based teaching?

作者: ap_cheung 時間: 10-12-4 22:25

谷得來, 都讀的好開心, 真是幾難得, 也好難明, 不知有冇更詳細的.....
也有听到有些媽媽說, 在基灣讀到太谷太大壓力, 後來小朋友轉去蘇浙讀, 開心番.....

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-4 21:18 發表
This sounds amazing - like a dream school:
"出名谷, 有壓力" but at the same time, "好多小朋友都讀得好開心. 每日都好小功課 (因為可以响學校完成)"

Do you know how do KCS manage it? Is it because it com ...

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-4 22:46

原帖由 ap_cheung 於 10-12-4 22:25 發表
谷得來, 都讀的好開心, 真是幾難得, 也好難明, 不知有冇更詳細的.....
也有听到有些媽媽說, 在基灣讀到太谷太大壓力, 後來小朋友轉去蘇浙讀, 開心番.....

...

Yes - I want to know more about it -谷得來, 都讀的好開心. Can any one share with us?
In KCS website, they say they are activity-based teaching but I heard from some saying that it is a very very traditional school.

作者: Jack0128 時間: 10-12-4 22:57

KCS is very small, because kindergarten and primary school share one basketball field only.
柴灣聖米迦勒is also good at acdemic, 3 tests, 3 exam.
Both of them have a lot of dictation.

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-4 22:46 發表

Yes - I want to know more about it -谷得來, 都讀的好開心. Can any one share with us?
In KCS website, they say they are activity-based teaching but I heard from some saying that it is a very very tr ...

作者: stephanielaw 時間: 10-12-5 12:28

我認同

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-1 17:26 發表
I heard that 蘇浙小學 academic level is higher than 柴灣聖米迦勒...... is this true?

作者: GIPW 時間: 10-12-5 15:21

Basically, students from KCS are all very happy.  Though there are many tests and exams (3+3) in a year, so far they have not felt any pressure.  If that is the way to study in earlyhood then they will think exam and test are sth horrible. Another thing that I noticed from KCS is there is more and more students who are from an "international" background, say some from France origin, America, South East Asia, China and etc.  The parents have a common vision are to polish their PTH when their children are small and that is the easier way to learn .  Just like on the parents say: you do not have to worried about PTH.  Some parents share the view that as compare with their elder kids who are in international school, they think KCS gives their child a better foundation.  Some might target to go to international school after P6 and others will stay at the local school.
KCS has a good sec school allocation last year:
12 - Cheung Cheuk Shan
5 -  BPS

3 - St Paul Co-ed

1- DGS

1 - DBS

4 - St Stephen College

1 - St Stephen Girl

4 - St Paul Boys'

2 - Marymont

1- St Stephen Covent

6- St Mark
12 - Chong Wah Fund

Criticism of the shcool will be there is not much ECA and the campus is small.
Hope this helps.

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-8 09:54

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Sorb 時間: 10-12-8 10:41

What GIPW has written should be the 2010 result, not being published in school website.

My niece is studying in KCS P3. I have asked her several times, but every time, she told me she had no pressure from study at all though she had a lot of dictations and tests/exams.

Homework is not too much, just 4-6 piece per day. For full day class, most can be finished in school.

[ 本帖最後由 Sorb 於 10-12-8 10:46 編輯 ]

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-8 14:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Sorb 時間: 10-12-8 18:12

KCS primary is 傳统教學. Not similar to "一些活動教學的直資".

作者: Sorb 時間: 10-12-8 18:20

This statement needs correction: "Kindergarten and primary school share one basketball field".
The true fact is the school buses occupy the basketball field for most of the time. Kidgergarten and primary students can seldom enjoy. But primary school has a sport field on the roof of the campus.

作者: GIPW 時間: 10-12-9 00:19

Go-to-school
佢是否如一些活動教學的直資 or 傳统教學?
So far I would classified them as traditional school.
仲有,其他余下學生派去邊？
派band 1 或英中比率？
There are only 4 classes. If 30 in a class, there are about 120 students. Apart from those posted above, some go to the 北官, 培僑, 蘇公 and some international school。 I can not remember the exact number, so if you are on the top 50% here, you will be able to get into some very good school.

作者: ma記 時間: 10-12-10 11:01

GIPW,

I heard that KCS not many ECA for kids. Can you share how KCS develop student ECA program?

Thx for your sharing.

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-10 13:54

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: KwanPark 時間: 10-12-10 22:20 標題: 回復 1# stseng 的帖子

蘇浙 OK d wor ...

作者: GIPW 時間: 10-12-11 02:47

Go-to-School
You are right.  運動項目 not much and not too emphasis.  The only school team that I know is swimming.  But your kid is not particular interested in sport or does not like to be 操練" then the level of exercise might be okay.
But  this school will train their students in 校際朗誦節 ,  Their teacher will put a lot of time to train their students to get good performance in the competition.  This is something to be appreciated as I know some other school does not train their students at all.
As when children go to a higher level, they will have less time for ECA and also need to put more time on studies, so some parents find the level of ECA is just right.  Esp most of the students will have their own ECA such as piano, drawing, dancing and etc.
One comment that I would say is the students are very 乖巧.

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-13 10:46

謝謝GIPW 及各位的意見, 真的好有幫助!
我小朋友讀蘇浙K3會升小一, 蘇浙同柴米收咗.我怕蘇浙太谷太深, 到時佢同我齊齊頂唔順, 我小朋友又唔迫得, 但蘇浙的普通活語境全港無人能及,加上Academic level 及peer group我絕對放心.
另一方面覺得放棄名氣不錯的津校柴米有點可惜, 它是基督教又可以免費讀六年嘛! 反正兩校都不是一條龍, 升中放面無分別, 所以覺得好難取捨.
但聽了各位意見和一些蘇小家長意見, 他們都出奇地說, 測考默家常飯, 但功課不多, 小朋友無壓力又開心, 聽落都有點安心. 但又好似好難明???
唔知在柴米又是否讀得輕鬆開心?
我小朋友K3話想上番蘇小, 我問佢點解, 佢話老師好好, 好Nice, 上堂講解清楚,令佢上課好明白甘話渦
甘情况你係我會點揀?

作者: DoReMi2008 時間: 10-12-13 12:17

Can anyone share what to choose among kindergarten & primary from Sacred Heart and KCS then?

Thanks

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-13 15:38 標題: 回復 1# DoReMi2008 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-13 15:50

回復 1# DoReMi2008 的帖子
I would suggest you to open a new topic for discussion instead of raising your question under this topic 標題: 蘇浙 vs 柴灣聖米迦勒. Thank you.

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-13 21:50 標題: 回復 4# stseng 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: shirleyauhc 時間: 10-12-13 23:17 標題: 回復 29# kochiman2004 的帖子

e間野,校長又串,家長好似中哂virus,學生同家長都沒時間負出,都唔洗小朋友有好日子過.

作者: ma記 時間: 10-12-13 23:46 標題: 回復 30# Go-to-school 的帖子

Totally agreed! 我C6都同你一樣睇法。如果可以用錢來secure band 1 入場卷，他都另願交學費vs讀大抽獎學校。

而且我囡依家讀緊蘇幼K3, 佢嗰班好似國際班甘，有成十幾個native English speaking 同學。所以她普英都無問題！

就算升蘇小一後冇甘多nat 同學，我相信peer group都非常重要。

我知道蘇小一每個星期有三堂係nat teacher教Oral. 我相信官校一定沒有這些資源。

好多朋友都話我哋甘傻，有免費學校唔讀，去讀一間要比錢嘅學校....但係我C6話：＂時間錯過咗就追唔返嫁啦！＂所以好大機會阿囡會讀蘇小。

作者: yantabo 時間: 10-12-14 02:30 標題: 回復 31# shirleyauhc 的帖子

why saying like that???
any examples??

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-14 09:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-14 09:35 標題: 回復 3# shirleyauhc 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: DoReMi2008 時間: 10-12-14 14:15 標題: 回覆 29# stseng 的文章

Sorry and thanks for your suggestion stseng.

Just a bit of detour from your discussion won’t affect you too much. Hope you don’t take it so seriously.

Cheers up

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-14 14:41

DoReMi2008 - no problem, i just thought that it may be for your benefit to get more concentrated responses by opening up a new topic.
Cheer!

原帖由 DoReMi2008 於 10-12-14 14:15 發表
Sorry and thanks for your suggestion stseng.

Just a bit of detour from your discussion won’t affect you too much. Hope you don’t take it so seriously.

Cheers up

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-15 09:28

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ap_cheung 時間: 10-12-15 14:07

如果沒有弟弟妹妹, 選蘇浙, 因為學術優胜好多,
但是如果有弟弟妹妹, 可能選枈米較好, 因為到時他們的兄妹會在自選派位時受益 . (加分)

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-15 14:19

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-16 21:17

Surely tuition fee $3000 is not cheap as some DSS only charge $2000 or less. As such, I am struggling on the choices. Some might think that it is quite stupid not to take the advantage of free education particular when 柴灣聖米迦勒 is already one of the most reputable primary schools in Eastern District. As such, it is quite hard to decide whether it is worth the money to go to KCS.

作者: shirleyauhc 時間: 10-12-20 23:28

我2場都有去,仲係最早坐個班,校長講野係好大體,大體得來有劍,要睇你睇唔睇到,佢講野個時,對眼view 緊d家長學生,話明坐唔定都唔會符合佢要求囉,,

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 10-12-14 09:35 發表
shirleyauhc
你回復kochiman 的帖子, 人地vote for 柴米喎! 你到底在comment 蘇小還是柴米呀?

仲有, 你的comment有咩理據呀?講黎聽吓, 如果有根有據我地會尊重你的寶貴意見 ...

作者: Chens 時間: 10-12-21 13:27

Again this looping problem (to u and me)...haha!
Money vs no Money

作者: sylcaca 時間: 10-12-21 21:26

我係柴米家長, 大仔P4細仔出年都入學LA~
我當初揀佢係因為佢近屋企, 同埋我都有同其他學校D家長交流心得, 仲有去睇附近幾間小學既返/放學情況, 比較起來, 真係覺得柴米D學生好乖,
課程本人覺得5係太深可以接受, 不過真係要家長配合, 功課1定要跟下, 考試要同佢溫書, 5掂真係要搵補習, 5好諗住D課程可以淺到由得佢自動波
功課平均都係做1-2個鐘, 學校主張1人1體藝, 自己學校家教會搞既興趣班都算多元化(i.e.樂器, 球類, 畫班, 英文班, etc.)價錢平, 我年年都會俾阿仔報
P4開始分班, 1精英班, 學校5會話你入5到精英班就放棄你既,
1英文強化班, 1數學強化班, 分小班上英/數堂, 我大仔舊年英文差入左英文班, 今次第1次考試真係有進步
我當初都有諗過幫大仔報直資, 不過有細仔跟尾學費會好甘, 後尾大抽獎入到柴米真係安樂晒, D$留番黎補習報興趣班好過LA~~

作者: stephanielaw 時間: 10-12-22 20:03

柴灣聖米迦勒 is already one of the most reputable primary schools in Eastern District
A joke???
in what way?

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-16 21:17 發表
Surely tuition fee $3000 is not cheap as some DSS only charge $2000 or less. As such, I am struggling on the choices. Some might think that it is quite stupid not to take the advantage of free educa ...

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-23 02:15

I thought the top subsidized schools in Eastern District are 基灣（愛蝶灣), 基灣(西灣河), 柴灣聖米迦勒 and 北角衛理. Am I correct?
I did not count DSS and Private schools when I made the comment.

原帖由 stephanielaw 於 10-12-22 20:03 發表
柴灣聖米迦勒 is already one of the most reputable primary schools in Eastern District
A joke???
in what way?

作者: somuiQQ 時間: 10-12-23 08:45

按臻媽的評論，16網四所比較好的小學是新基灣，舊基灣，柴米和丘佐榮。
或者大家可以從另一個角度來比較。柴米是一流的免費小學，蘇浙卻不是一流的收費小學，要每個月多花那么多錢，值不值得呢？

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-23 02:15 發表
I thought the top subsidized schools in Eastern District are 基灣（愛蝶灣), 基灣(西灣河), 柴灣聖米迦勒 and 北角衛理. Am I correct?
I did not count DSS and Private schools when I made the comment.

...

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-23 11:38 標題: 回復 47# somuiQQ 的帖子

By the way,who is 臻媽?

Solely my view:

蘇浙不是一流的收費小學 when one compare it with SPCCPS, SPC......etc
柴米不是一流的免費小學 when one compare it with Wah Yan, St Jo......etc.
However, both are good schools.

每個月多花那么多錢，值不值得呢？It depends how you view it - it saves you quite some money on Mandarin training for sure. We are talking about speaking Mandarin in the school all day long every day.

作者: Sorb 時間: 10-12-23 15:19

Agree with your statement re 一流小學

.  Both KCS and 柴米 are above average schools for sure.
I think KCS outweight 柴米 in 2 key aspects only.  So, it is up to the parents to judge if it is worth of $3,100 per month.
Firstly, Mandarine environment, I trust you cannot train your children's Mandarine equivalently good as those KCS primary students with $3,100 outside.  Give you an example, the K2 kid of my friend (not from KCS) has joined a group Mandarine class for $180 an hour (once per week).  My friend thinks it is not enough, so, give the kid another 1-1 Mandarine class, which is $400 per hour (once per week).  So, only for 2 hours per week, she is spending $2,320 on her kid's Mandarine training, but the kid's mandarine ability is still not as good as those KCS K2 kids that I know.
Secondly, you are paying for the peer group.  I trust the overall quality of the students in KCS primary theorectically and generally speaking should be better than 柴米 as 柴米 is an aided school.  Aided schools cannot control the quality of the students they intake is an undeniable fact....this is why so many good aided schools changed or plan to change to DSS/private.
$3,100 means a lot to many families, so, judge it yourself if you are willing to spend it.  If not, 柴米 is definately a good choice.

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 10-12-24 12:29 標題: 回復 8# shirleyauhc 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-29 16:53

Do any of you have a list of 升中派位of 柴米 for me to compare with that of 蘇小? Thanks.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 10-12-29 21:48

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-29 16:53 發表
Do any of you have a list of 升中派位of 柴米 for me to compare with that of 蘇小? Thanks.

Did you check St Michael's website? I can download the pdf a few years ago.

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-30 17:30 標題: 回覆 52# ANChan59 的文章

I searched through St. Michael's website but could not find it. I simply want to compare it with that of KCS. Could any of you help me (maybe parents of students at Chaiwan St. Michael)?

作者: ANChan59 時間: 10-12-30 18:39

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-30 17:30 發表
I searched through St. Michael's website but could not find it. I simply want to compare it with that of KCS. Could any of you help me (maybe parents of students at Chaiwan St. Michael)?

Yes, you are right, they removed the allocation results from the website.

Another alternative is go to North Point Methodist Primary School and check their allocation results. From my memory, if it doesn't let me down, their portfolio quite simlar to St Michael except the % of EMI of NPMPS (60-65%) > CWSMS (~55%).

作者: stseng 時間: 10-12-30 22:02

Dear ANChan59
What does "EMI" mean?

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-12-30 18:39 發表

Yes, you are right, they removed the allocation results from the website.

Another alternative is go to North Point Methodist Primary School and check their allocation results. From my memory, if it ...

作者: ANChan59 時間: 10-12-30 23:50

原帖由 stseng 於 10-12-30 22:02 發表
Dear ANChan59
What does "EMI" mean?

English Medium of Instruction

作者: stephanielaw 時間: 11-1-2 20:48

不太明白如果 allocation portfolio are simliar, 點解一間係60-65%，而另一間係55%

況且，從北循的學校網頁看，emi 應是55%，而近年都未有見到柴米的官方升中資料

略略一睇，東區既學校，有將升中派位放上網，而又有65%以上，應該有愛碟灣基灣同滬江

原帖由 ANChan59 於 10-12-30 18:39 發表

Yes, you are right, they removed the allocation results from the website.

Another alternative is go to North Point Methodist Primary School and check their allocation results. From my memory, if it ...

作者: stephanielaw 時間: 11-1-2 20:54

不好意思，是北衛，不是北循

原帖由 stephanielaw 於 11-1-2 20:48 發表
不太明白如果 allocation portfolio are simliar, 點解一間係60-65%，而另一間係55%

況且，從北循的學校網頁看，emi 應是55%，而近年都未有見到柴米的官方升中資料

略略一睇，東區既學校，有將升中派位放上網，而又有65%以上，應該 ...

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-2 22:49

原帖由 stephanielaw 於 11-1-2 20:54 發表
不好意思，是北衛，不是北循

From my memory (4-5 years ago), the school portfolio is similar means similar school mixed:

Girls: BPS, YWG, St Stephen Girls.....
Boys: QC, SPB, HKWY.....
Co-Educ: SPCC, CCSC, SKWGSS....

Different % means different numbers to those schools. As no updated info, just an alternative to assess CWSMS.

Other CWSMS parents pls confirm this......

作者: tungmom 時間: 11-1-5 14:05

The situation is quite similar to what I faced in last year - Kei Wan Vs SHC Private. Kei Wan is one of the best subsidized schools in Eastern District but I chose SHC at the end for its secondary school, reputation and students' quality. I think KCS is better in terms of academic results and a higher chance to get into top secondary school. To me, St Michael is just a school slightly above the average in Eastern District and not a reputable school in HK in general.

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-6 10:23

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Sorb 時間: 11-1-6 14:11

Starting from this year, the school will not publize the result in web.....I learnt they do this based on the advice from EDB. I know the 2010's result is slightly better than 2009. So, you just make reference to 2009 lah.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-6 14:50

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-6 14:11 發表
Starting from this year, the school will not publize the result in web.....I learnt they do this based on the advice from EDB. I know the 2010's result is slightly better than 2009. So, you just make ...

Any quoted source of your statement. NPMPS and SMS(NP)..... still publized in the web, it's a right thing to do.

EDB is crazy, blind leads the blind...... unfair to users - students and parents......

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-6 14:55

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-6 15:55

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 11-1-6 14:55 發表
Thanks Sorb
教局甘搞法令資訊透明度大减,對一眾家長選校無好處.只令大家更烏下烏下,估下估下,甘選校

May be this is their intention.

作者: Sorb 時間: 11-1-6 17:25

I just hearsay only....I don't know if it is really the advice from EDB.

If it is really an advice/suggestion from EDB, as long as it is not rule, you can choose to follow or not, this is why some schools still prefer to give the public transparency law. So, we should give "clap" to those schools.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-6 17:34 標題: 回覆 66# Sorb 的文章

I understand your point.

I also know some schools won't disclose the results because their results declined as the rule of game changed in the last few years. The weighing factor is changed every year according to TSA results.

Like NPMPS, their results dropped a bit due to the new weighing factors over years. Transparency is our concerns.

作者: Sorb 時間: 11-1-6 17:45

At first when I learnt KCS would not publize its 2010 allocation result on web. My 1st thinking is the result must have dropped/declined in 2010, so, not willing to disclose publicely law. But I later found out it is actually slighly better than 2009 .....so, that is why I suggest you guys to make reference to 2009 for 2010 result law.

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-6 17:59 標題: 回覆 68# Sorb 的文章

Agreed.

Now. using moving average TSA results as weighing factor, the 2009 result can be a good reference for 2010 & 2011. Of course, the relevance will be declined according to time.

作者: GIPW 時間: 11-1-6 19:59

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-6 17:45 發表
At first when I learnt KCS would not publize its 2010 allocation result on web. My 1st thinking is the result must have dropped/declined in 2010, so, not willing to disclose publicely law. But I lat ...

Yes that is my thought too so when I know the actual result then I am relieve.

But I can't comment on St Michael as I have no idea about this school

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-7 15:55 標題: 回復 1# GIPW 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: GIPW 時間: 11-1-8 00:40

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 11-1-7 15:55 發表
甘即係蘇小只向學生家長公布派位成績,

敢問係張貼出黎或只口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長?如果兩樣都唔係,甘你地從何得知?

HI
They will only post it in the internal office and parents are welcome to check with them. So this is more like this approach (口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長) I checked and memorized them.

作者: Sorb 時間: 11-1-8 10:11

No no GIPW, should be 張貼出黎公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長, but parents cannot copy, testing the parents' memory : )

原帖由 GIPW 於 11-1-8 00:40 發表

HI
They will only post it in the internal office and parents are welcome to check with them. So this is more like this approach (口頭公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長) I checked and memorized them. :qui ...

作者: stseng 時間: 11-1-10 21:13

We do not need to memorize it. If they post the list in the office and let us go in to check it out, then we should just bring a pen and a paper with us and copy the list manually.

原帖由 Sorb 於 11-1-8 10:11 發表
No no GIPW, should be 張貼出黎公佈予個別查旬的蘇小家長, but parents cannot copy, testing the parents' memory : )

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-10 21:56

原帖由 stseng 於 11-1-10 21:13 發表
We do not need to memorize it. If they post the list in the office and let us go in to check it out, then we should just bring a pen and a paper with us and copy the list manually.

A suggestion, use the camera of your mobile phone.

作者: stseng 時間: 11-1-12 15:39 標題: 回復 75# ANChan59 的帖子

yes - use a camera!!!

作者: GIPW 時間: 11-1-16 01:48

I know. But the as I said I am not supposed to take picture or photocopy so the only thing I could do is to memorize the top few schools.

The principal they have signed the agreement with the education department that they will no longer post the result on the web - I do not like this idea at all. Why they education dept deprive the right for us to know the allocation of the school ?

作者: ANChan59 時間: 11-1-16 11:46 標題: 回覆 77# GIPW 的文章

權力使人腐化.........
愚民政策...............

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-17 14:10 標題: 回復 1# ANChan59 的帖子

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-24 17:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Go-to-school 時間: 11-1-24 17:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: GIPW 時間: 11-1-25 01:00

原帖由 Go-to-school 於 11-1-24 17:30 發表
呢D就叫卑錢同冇卑錢既分別:

蘇小網站-
"在中、英文組中榮獲冠軍29個、亞軍64個、季軍54個，共獲獎項147個，再創歷史新高."

蘇小put quite a lot of effort in 朗誦. The teacher started to train the student in Sept and the competition takes place in Nov and Dec. So most of the students has undergone a 2 mths training.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)