教育王國

標題: 陳守仁VS蔡繼有VS聖約瑟(觀塘) [打印本頁]

作者: icq123 時間: 10-11-19 11:55 標題: 陳守仁VS蔡繼有VS聖約瑟(觀塘)

如果3間都收你地會點選擇???請比D意見,TKS!!!

作者: phoebecyl 時間: 10-11-19 13:31

如果有錢又打算將來送小朋友出國我會選蔡繼友,不過我自己最like tsl

原帖由 icq123 於 10-11-19 11:55 發表
如果3間都收你地會點選擇???請比D意見,TKS!!!

作者: motherotk 時間: 10-11-19 14:11

蔡繼友 - the kids speak excellent English and Mandarin - native; love readings and not "mechanical"; make sense!!

原帖由 phoebecyl 於 10-11-19 13:31 發表
如果有錢又打算將來送小朋友出國我會選蔡繼友,不過我自己最like tsl

作者: penguin_chick 時間: 10-11-19 19:29

選蔡繼有不會後悔，升大學方面，本地海外都不會有問題。其餘兩間，都是好學校，但沒有親身體驗，不便批評。

作者: Annngan 時間: 10-11-20 00:53

[quote]原帖由 icq123 於 10-11-19 11:55 發表

其實各有各好，CKY是新校社設備齊而且還有個豪華大禮堂非常舒適但學費貴，位置在半山須要坐校車。
TSL教學模式跟CKY相似，但在兩者作比教就真係唔知邊間水平高Ｄ，又或者CKY學費貴的關係，所以不少家長喜歡選擇TSL。其實邊間難入啲和水平是否一樣呢？如果唔繼學費，大家又会選邊間？只是好奇一問。謝謝各位意見！

作者: ha! 時間: 10-11-20 02:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: fotk 時間: 10-11-20 07:10

CKY very good environment for learning, better than TSL

原帖由 ha! 於 10-11-20 02:08 發表
"TSL教學模式跟CKY相似" -- 教學模式應該不相似

tsl 是傳統local school syllabus, 不過語境好, 有20%外籍人士

cky 最後兩年是行 ib, 不行 hk的syllabus的, 比較活動教學, 語境好, 主要local 學生。 ...

[ 本帖最後由 fotk 於 10-11-20 07:19 編輯 ]

作者: icq123 時間: 10-11-20 12:55

其實陳守仁升中派位好嗎?講真,學費相差$3500/月,都唔知如何選擇好???

作者: Annngan 時間: 10-11-20 15:51

[quote]原帖由 fotk 於 10-11-20 07:10 發表

Hi fotk
Is that ture? Could you mine to send me more information about CKY.
Thanks!

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-11-20 22:38

CKY is very good! None of the people I know would complain about this school so far. They are all pleased with the education system there.

作者: Antonymum 時間: 10-11-21 03:10

我有個朋友個仔仔讀緊CKY中學，但我唔記得係第幾班? 不過據我朋友講小學的確幾好，但自上了中學後，語文學術好像遜色了。至於TSL則出名學費平，語文環境良好。最後 St. Joseph Anglo-Chinese Primary School(Kwun Tong)都係好出名的，英文程度好深，係傳統名校，加上升中派位理想，老實說，各有各好，真係好難作比較啊！

作者: penguin_chick 時間: 10-11-21 17:23

請問cky中學的語文學術程度怎樣遜色？在那方面可看到？請指教，好讓小學生可及早補求。謝謝！

作者: motherotk 時間: 10-11-22 06:56

CKY is very good. If you have enough financial support and get accepted, no doubt go there instead of TSL, unless you want your child go to traditional model in secondary school. e.g.in TSL, the P6 alloation is good for certain percentage of students with good academic results, they can go for good schools in HK (e.g. wah yan, st paul etc..)

TSL, traditional model with less stress, yet good curriculum, good English and Chinese in writing, not verbal (only small percentage of students speak fluent English and Mandarin). In CKY most of the student speak beautiful Chinese and English and they were prepared to go for IB. Kids in both school as I observed enjoy happy school life and good development due to the good curriculum, language policy and administration of the school

Some kids feel more secure in traditional models, some kids love more flexible and creative means of learning. Some kids feel comfortable at the begining with the traditional model, but later love more creative means..

See how you assess your kids' learning needs

Both are good schools in terms of admin...with good quality teachers and curriculum..

原帖由 penguin_chick 於 10-11-21 17:23 發表
請問cky中學的語文學術程度怎樣遜色？在那方面可看到？請指教，好讓小學生可及早補求。謝謝！

[ 本帖最後由 motherotk 於 10-11-22 07:08 編輯 ]

作者: Tweety112 時間: 10-11-22 11:23

我都考慮緊陳守仁 or 聖約瑟(觀塘)!!
因為我有個細女, 所以我會揀TSL。

作者: oldpooh 時間: 10-11-22 13:54

聖約瑟英文小學（觀塘道）風格接近SFA（聖方濟各），都系私小，出名谷，而且學術程度深既傳統名校。

作者: qqbabe 時間: 10-11-22 14:02

如果以學生品行紀律比較, 點睇cky vs. tsl?

作者: motherotk 時間: 10-11-22 18:39

Both are well-behaved and well-mannered, yet not mechanical. CKY seems more creative and lively

原帖由 qqbabe 於 10-11-22 14:02 發表
如果以學生品行紀律比較, 點睇cky vs. tsl?

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)