教育王國

標題: 保良局小學裡, 你認為邊幾間最好? [打印本頁]

作者: 沖廁 時間: 10-8-17 23:58 標題: 保良局小學裡, 你認為邊幾間最好?

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 沖廁 時間: 10-9-11 03:45

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-11 09:22

林文燦

原帖由沖廁於 10-8-17 23:58 發表
陳守仁? 蔡繼友?
還有嗎?

作者: brian61950 時間: 10-9-11 11:31

余李慕芬(特殊教育),有教無類.

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-11 21:49

According to the academic result, CKY should be the best.

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-11 22:02

CKY is running in form of IB. It is different system, and hard to compare. I think the upperest class is Grade 10 in 2010. There was no result on % of students getting in universities yet.

CKY is a good school. For my opinion, it is the best? Maybe.

But, one thing I know, the most expensive one amongst all PLK primary schools.

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 21:49 發表
According to the academic result, CKY should be the best.

[ 本帖最後由 Whitepine 於 10-9-11 22:04 編輯 ]

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-11 22:09

PLK schools are generally good in my mind.

原帖由 Whitepine 於 10-9-11 22:02 發表
CKY is running in form of IB. It is different system, and hard to compare. I think the upperest class is Grade 10 in 2010. There was no result on % of students getting in universities yet.

CKY is a g ...

[ 本帖最後由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 22:11 編輯 ]

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-11 22:18

Yes, my colleague has two sons studing in CKY. My son's three kindergarten classmates went to CKY this year. TSL...I don't need to tell you. My son is studying P1 in LMC this year...

All three schools are good.

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 22:09 發表
PLK schools are generally good in my mind.

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-11 22:21

Many ex-workmates of mine also send their kids to CKY. They only give us positive comment. My husband's workamtes also love this school very much.

I studied in PLK schools before. :)

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-11 22:59

All my friends, colleagues and other parents have very good comments on CKY and TSL...

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-11 23:02

You studied in PLK before. Good. I think your kid has advantages on applying PLK primary schools.

The chance is higher!!

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 22:21 發表
Many ex-workmates of mine also send their kids to CKY. They only give us positive comment. My husband's workamtes also love this school very much.

I studied in PLK schools before. :)

作者: yypapa 時間: 10-9-11 23:05

whitepine,

when looking at TSL's p6 allocation in the past few years, I noticed that none of the graduates from TSL continue their secondary education at CKY. Personally I think CKY should be a suitation path for TSL graduates. Do you have any clue why this is not happening ?

原帖由 Whitepine 於 10-9-11 22:59 發表
All my friends, colleagues and other parents have very good comments on CKY and TSL...

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-12 00:29

I think, there are several possibilities.

1. CKY and TSL are in different education systems to run. CKY in IB and TSL in international-like local system. The students may not be easily converted and adapted if someone want to study in CKY after graduated P6 in TSL.

2. The decision / direction has been made at P1 or Grade 1. The parents has chosen IB or not...Maybe some students will leave during the first two or three years. eg. CKY G2 to P2, or P2 to CKY G2.
When the students are in P.6., it may be too late to change, or not willing to change.

3. CKY may not accept new students after G6. Or they were full already, no vacancy available.

4. Too expensive of the school fee in CKY ... Ha Ha...

There are only my guess....

原帖由 yypapa 於 10-9-11 23:05 發表
whitepine,

when looking at TSL's p6 allocation in the past few years, I noticed that none of the graduates from TSL continue their secondary education at CKY. Personally I think CKY should be a sui ...

作者: fatherfather 時間: 10-9-12 01:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: chanmeow 時間: 10-9-12 15:04

馮睛派位唔差，９成第一志願，設施ｏｋ有音樂演奏廰，上次簡介會見到讀La Salle，入讀港大法律系的畢業生都對母校讚不絶口，話為中學打下良好基礎。有人話擔心功課多，但家長學生話功課質素好，甚少死做爛做。其實功課多，又真係可以幫學生穩固知識。以前考會考，未又係死操爛操。
如果以咁多間保記計，唔駛錢中我都會揀馮睛。都係個句，慳番ｄ學費可以用黎學野。如果我係公務員／專業人士，我都揀ｃｋｙ，中英好環境靚，又無陳守仁咁難入。
弊在我係普通人供樓又貴，無閒錢俾佢讀真資／私立，送子女外國讀書。要有信心佢係香港考入大學。唯有揀間派位好的本地免費小學就算。
呢家香港讀大學都係講緊３０幾萬，約莫等於中小直資小學至高中的費用。
讀外國大學仲要額外多１００萬（計埋生活費）左右。
有２個仔女就全部ｘ２。呢幾年經濟好錢易賺，但幾年前香港環境真係差差差，十幾年的commitment唔易make。比較邊間好唔好唔係太有意思，應讓計埋佢係邊種學校。總結一句，私立的我揀CKY，真資的我揀TSL，免費的我揀馮睛。

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-12 15:26

CKY has 5 years of primary school education only. It should be the main reason why none of TSL students going there. I suppose TSL students would go to normal sec. school (not IB)

原帖由 yypapa 於 10-9-11 23:05 發表
whitepine,

when looking at TSL's p6 allocation in the past few years, I noticed that none of the graduates from TSL continue their secondary education at CKY. Personally I think CKY should be a sui ...

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-12 15:26

Really?? But TSL won't consider that in my opinion.
I have taught for PLK school too. I hope it would make my chance higher as well? :)

原帖由 Whitepine 於 10-9-11 23:02 發表
You studied in PLK before. Good. I think your kid has advantages on applying PLK primary schools.

The chance is higher!!

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-12 18:59

Your case is much better than other applicants already. Last year, did they mention in the admission seminar this year?, TSL did say if the parents taught in PLK or the children graduated from PLK kindergarten would have advantages to be accepted first.

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-12 15:26 發表
Really?? But TSL won't consider that in my opinion.
I have taught for PLK school too. I hope it would make my chance higher as well? :)

作者: fatherfather 時間: 10-9-12 19:40

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 10-9-12 19:52

i may be wrong, however, from what i have always heard... unfortunately, it's not the case...

原帖由 Whitepine 於 12/9/2010 18:59 發表
Your case is much better than other applicants already. Last year, did they mention in the admission seminar this year?, TSL did say if the parents taught in PLK or the children graduated from PLK kin ...

作者: Whitepine 時間: 10-9-12 20:37

Really!! Your "say" is more reliable than mine because you are the TSL parent.

But, I did remember the teacher mentioned about it last year?????

Anyway, it didn't bother me now right!!

原帖由 flostangraphy 於 10-9-12 19:52 發表
i may be wrong, however, from what i have always heard... unfortunately, it's not the case...

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-12 22:43

but, I am not teaching in PLK schools anymore. :(
and TSL would care about the interview most.

原帖由 Whitepine 於 10-9-12 18:59 發表
Your case is much better than other applicants already. Last year, did they mention in the admission seminar this year?, TSL did say if the parents taught in PLK or the children graduated from PLK kin ...

作者: bowling68 時間: 10-9-13 00:02

About TSL. yup. graduate from PLK kindergarten should have additional points and my son got admitted during the 1st stage last year.

about CKY, I knew 2 friends whom their children studying there.

1 is the boss of printing fty, and her girl has finished P.5 and just go to study in UK.

the other is the leader in fire service dept.
his 2 sons there for P.5 & P.2

all of them enjoy studying there pretty much.

only concern is the investment not just 5 years in CKY, but consider the whole IB course.

作者: huba 時間: 10-9-13 00:21

I am not a current TSL parent but have attended this year's admission seminar.

The principal did state clearly that admission is based on interview performance and there is no extra points for PLK kindergarten kids. The rules of game may have changed.

原帖由 bowling68 於 13/9/2010 00:02 發表
About TSL. yup. graduate from PLK kindergarten should have additional points and my son got admitted during the 1st stage last year.

about CKY, I knew 2 friends whom their children studying there.

...

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 10-9-13 00:26

原帖由 huba 於 10-9-13 00:21 發表
I am not a current TSL parent but have attended this year's admission seminar.

The principal did state clearly that admission is based on interview performance and there is no extra points for PLK ki ...

係呀...而且就算有哥哥姐姐讀都唔會加分, 都只係分數相近時先考慮。所以我估PLK KG, 就更加唔會有分加。再者, TSL收生都唔會睇人讀咩KG, 真係睇個小朋友INTERVIEW表現而定。

作者: cha-cha-cha 時間: 10-9-13 13:43

私小同直資有他的好處,
至小家長的質素會較接近.

大抽獎是公平的,
因此每間津小官小也會有單親小孩和新移民的存在.
單親並不是有罪,但大多年輕的單親媽媽都不願教養他們的孩兒,並將責任卸給上一代及社工.
而且他們超過一半的家庭的教養方法也是很求其的,
因此不是現在的小學生難教,
是學習環境複雜而已.

在很主觀的理性推測下,
如果一個新移民家庭能負擔昂貴學費,課外活動,飯錢,車錢,及該校的雜費(每月共$3000以上),
願意按月支付上述各項,教養方面應相對較有要求的.

例子只適用於新移民,
並不包括(投資移民及輸入專才計劃的新移民)

孩子心智思想尚未成熟,容易受朋輩影響.

幾千元學費,相對來說,絕對值得付出的.

原帖由 fatherfather 於 10-9-12 19:40 發表
完全認同你的說法
讀直資同私校家長必須留意昂貴學費，生活環境係會改變，我唔覺得4000幾一個月小學學費係值得。

作者: tws2010 時間: 10-9-13 21:14

学校村錦泰唔錯, 校風好, 讀書風氣積極, 師資好, 升中大部份入band1, 学生乖有礼貌

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 22:09 發表
PLK schools are generally good in my mind.

作者: chanmeow 時間: 10-9-13 22:38 標題: 回覆 26# cha-cha-cha 的文章

同意

幾千蚊太平，應該揀int school，最好要買1球美金債券個d，咁家長先夠上等人，顯出我仔女的尊貴。
千萬唔好讀皇仁，裏面唔夠多有錢人，例如 "皇仁龍"。

作者: DKiu 時間: 10-9-14 11:05

咁我又想問下, 有無人留意保良局黃永樹... ??

作者: daisymanyu 時間: 10-9-14 11:38

我個囝想讀黃永樹..貪佢學校够大哦

原帖由 DKiu 於 10-9-14 11:05 發表
咁我又想問下, 有無人留意保良局黃永樹... ??

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-9-14 18:53

In fact, Luk Hing To is very good too!

作者: leetong 時間: 10-9-15 15:00 標題: 回覆 29# DKiu 的文章

PLK WWS is a good primary school. My children are now in P.2.
Some parents said 4 exams in a school year is too tight, but it is a matter of learning attitude. My children are still attending ECA, both swimming and piano, they can manage yet.

作者: DKiu 時間: 10-9-15 15:05 標題: 回覆 32# leetong 的文章

Leetong,

Thank yor for your sharing!!!

是不是在第一輪就收你的小朋友... ?

作者: leetong 時間: 10-9-15 15:15 標題: 回覆 32# leetong 的文章

But I admit WWS has talent-class from P.3 or P.4 which is not a right pushing force to all students especially those who cannot study.

作者: leetong 時間: 10-9-15 15:17 標題: 回覆 33# DKiu 的文章

Nope. WWS accepts in 2nd round. Last year, I didn't apply any DSS or private school, thank god. They studied in PLK's kindergarten.

作者: leetong 時間: 10-9-15 15:19 標題: 回覆 31# cpcog 的文章

Sure. It is a good primary school either.

作者: vincat 時間: 10-9-22 13:32

仲有保良局香港道教鹽合會圓玄小學 (Tuen Mun 直資)

作者: mingb 時間: 10-9-22 17:01

原帖由 fatherfather 於 10-9-12 19:40 發表
完全認同你的說法
讀直資同私校家長必須留意昂貴學費，生活環境係會改變，我唔覺得4000幾一個月小學學費係值得。

我都冇報直資同私校，不過人地供架車都一萬蚊個月，四千蚊學費真係唔會覺得有ｄ咩野，值唔值得睇你搵幾多錢吧．

作者: IWAT 時間: 10-9-24 14:52

我個兩個女,淨幼稚園+車費, 一個月萬3(未計其他興趣班)... 係好貴...

值唔值好睇你想點, 同你可唔可以接受...

作者: jeremyphlam 時間: 10-9-24 15:01

原帖由 cpcog 於 10-9-11 21:49 發表
According to the academic result, CKY should be the best.

乜有result睇咩，好似到今日都係買緊前景至喎，希望唔好成為第二間優才啦！

作者: elaineho73 時間: 10-10-1 14:08

我既兩個女都係黃永樹讀緊! 佢地都讀得好開心, 而且派位都好好呀! 校舍又大又靚, 另外係區內既津貼學校中唯一一間有個泳池呀!

原帖由 leetong 於 10-9-15 15:00 發表
PLK WWS is a good primary school. My children are now in P.2.
Some parents said 4 exams in a school year is too tight, but it is a matter of learning attitude. My children are still attending ECA, bo ...

作者: weiwai 時間: 10-10-1 17:01

請問馮睛響邊ga?

原帖由 chanmeow 於 10-9-12 15:04 發表
馮睛派位唔差，９成第一志願，設施ｏｋ有音樂演奏廰，上次簡介會見到讀La Salle，入讀港大法律系的畢業生都對母校讚不絶口，話為中學打下良好基礎。有人話擔心功課多，但家長學生話功課質素好，甚少死做爛做。其實功課多，又真係可以幫學生 ...

作者: weiwai 時間: 10-10-1 17:02

請問呢間響邊呢? thx

原帖由 tws2010 於 10-9-13 21:14 發表
学校村錦泰唔錯, 校風好, 讀書風氣積極, 師資好, 升中大部份入band1, 学生乖有礼貌

作者: weiwai 時間: 10-10-1 17:04

你地讚到咁. 好想去了解下黃永樹
請問wws響邊ga?

原帖由 elaineho73 於 10-10-1 14:08 發表

我既兩個女都係黃永樹讀緊! 佢地都讀得好開心, 而且派位都好好呀! 校舍又大又靚, 另外係區內既津貼學校中唯一一間有個泳池呀!
...

作者: cpcog 時間: 10-10-1 22:04

It should be in TKO.
If you want to know all of their address, you can go to the website of PLK!

原帖由 weiwai 於 10-10-1 17:01 發表
請問馮睛響邊ga?

作者: fatherfather 時間: 10-10-1 22:25

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: elaineho73 時間: 10-10-1 23:13

黃永樹(WWS)係將軍澳架~
你個小朋友幾大呀? 每年學校都有開放日, 舊年好多人參觀呀~

原帖由 weiwai 於 10-10-1 17:04 發表
你地讚到咁. 好想去了解下黃永樹
請問wws響邊ga?

作者: jovababy 時間: 10-10-3 02:00

"希望唔好成為第二間優才".....唔係好明你嘅意思...請問此話何解呢?

原帖由 jeremyphlam 於 10-9-24 15:01 發表

乜有result睇咩，好似到今日都係買緊前景至喎，希望唔好成為第二間優才啦！

作者: lkong2005 時間: 10-10-3 22:47

優才學校在網上發報了其學生２０１０的會考成績。收Band 1 生，11 年後，出band 2成績, 名大於實，成績強差人意。相反，藉藉無名的直資保良局羅氏基金中學，收Band ２生（ＫＰＭ數據），出band １成績，真是諷刺！

新的直資如GT，播道，真道或CKY屬同類學校，相信將來公開試成績也相差不遠……..

作者: dong-dong 時間: 10-10-4 09:13

一杆打沉一船人﹐是不是有點過于武斷啊。

原帖由 lkong2005 於 10-10-3 22:47 發表
優才學校在網上發報了其學生２０１０的會考成績。收Band 1 生，11 年後，出band 2成績, 名大於實，成績強差人意。相反，藉藉無名的直資保良局羅氏基金中學，收Band ２生（ＫＰＭ數據），出band １成績，真是諷刺！

新的直資如GT，播道，真道或CKY屬同類學校，相 ...

作者: leetong 時間: 10-10-4 10:10

Though my children didn't apply GT, GT's open examination is quite good, particularly English.
At least, GT announced its HKCEE exam result, its management must follow up.

作者: lkong2005 時間: 10-10-4 13:25

優才的英文成績算不錯,
但要拿到香港的大學門票,不能只看英文. 以現時優才平均成績估計,不容易在香港拿到大學門票.
是不是大部分優才畢業生都送到外國讀大學? 成本是否太大?
優才學校要收學費的,收Band 1 生出band 2成績的負增值學校,優才肯定有問題.

不過優才總比真道好,
這幾年來真道連會考成績也不敢公佈. 每年只是在簡介會吹幾好幾好,
英文成績肯定優才比真道好,
相信其他學科也一樣. 大部分真道畢業生也要送到外國讀大學….

作者: leetong 時間: 10-10-5 09:53 標題: 回覆 52# lkong2005 的文章

In fact, some of the parents (e.g. civil servants) have multiple plans for their children. Oversea study is one of the plans yet.

Lessen threads can I find about GT right now, tertiary education in HK, more or less, is their first choice.

[ 本帖最後由 leetong 於 10-10-5 10:37 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)