教育王國

標題: .... [打印本頁]

作者: tt_liu 時間: 10-4-27 15:01 標題: ....

本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 12-4-18 17:11 編輯

..........

作者: Kareese 時間: 10-4-27 17:16

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: tt_liu 時間: 10-4-27 18:10

本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 12-4-18 17:12 編輯

.........

作者: nintendo 時間: 10-4-28 10:17

SJS has lots of applicants every year.
The reason is mainly that they serve a really huge geographical area.
Applicants to SJS are mostly local Chinese so you are competing to people with similar background as you are.

作者: c200 時間: 10-4-28 10:48

Will you also apply RC? I guess RC is more chinese than SJS

作者: lottieclee 時間: 10-4-28 11:13

原帖由 tt_liu 於 10-4-27 15:01 發表
相對其他 esf primary, 競爭大嗎?

如已是 esf kinder student + cat 2, 機會大嗎?

因今年9月要報, 我們有幾個地址, 最心儀係 sjs, 你們認為應否博sjs? or 相對穩陣地報qbs呢?

Thanks! ...

Haven't you considered that QBS maybe better than SJS?

作者: tt_liu 時間: 10-4-28 17:01

本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 12-4-18 17:13 編輯

Hi nintendo,

Thank you for your reply!

原帖由 nintendo 於 10-4-28 10:17 發表
SJS has lots of applicants every year.
The reason is mainly that they serve a really huge geographical area.
Applicants to SJS are mostly local Chinese so you are competing to people with similar back ...

作者: tt_liu 時間: 10-4-28 17:05

本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 12-4-18 17:13 編輯

.......

原帖由 c200 於 10-4-28 10:48 發表
Will you also apply RC? I guess RC is more chinese than SJS

[ 本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 10-4-28 17:16 編輯 ]

作者: tt_liu 時間: 10-4-28 17:15

本帖最後由 tt_liu 於 12-4-18 17:14 編輯

.......

原帖由 lottieclee 於 10-4-28 11:13 發表

Haven't you considered that QBS maybe better than SJS?

作者: Mighty 時間: 10-5-4 10:29

雖然我不了解QBS,不過我覚得学校之間是不可以這様比較的、如果好采遇到個好的CLASS　TEACHER、就整年都開心。　　当然PRINCIPAL都好重要、ＳＪＳ換了新校長後、顕然作風不同了、還加入了以前没有的ＬＥＡＲＮＩＮＧ　ＪＯＵＲＮＥＹ、学生＆家長一同参加、効果不錯。
ＳＪＳ大部分是ＬＯＣＡＬ　ＦＡＭＩＬＹ，但小朋友在学校都是主要以英文ＣＯＭＭＵＮＩＣＡＴＥ。　当然不是ＰＥＲＦＥＣＴ　ＥＮＧＬＩＳＨ．　　At least they are initated to talk in English.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)