教育王國

標題: 蔡繼有 vs 弘立 [打印本頁]

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-1-28 12:45 標題: 蔡繼有 vs 弘立

both use IB, which one is better?

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-1-28 14:16

Can anyone please advise?

原帖由 kidsmother 於 10-1-28 12:45 發表
both use IB, which one is better?

作者: kyliema2006 時間: 10-1-28 15:28

弘立學費貴一倍有多，論語境我會覺得弘立更佳，因有不少外國及混血兒學生。我都很喜歡弘立，但我負擔不來，亦住得很遠，所以我揀選了蔡繼有。

作者: scotia.nova 時間: 10-1-28 16:35

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: kyliema2006 時間: 10-1-28 17:07

我相信始終有些學生是不太守規則的，但論語境，蔡繼有一定會比傳統學校的好。

二月六日是蔡繼有開放日，若你有興趣，不妨到訪，接觸一下學生。

原帖由 scotia.nova 於 10-1-28 16:35 發表
kyliema
My friend said the kids in CKY speaks Cantonese in recess time and even in the classroom during their discussion.
Do you know if this is the case? I like CKY but I'm concern if they really ca ...

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-1-28 17:30

Is there any secondary school for CKY? Since CKY is not an IB school, will the students go for local 334 diploma? If they really go for local 334 diploma, are you afraid that they may be behind other local traditional schools (I fear eventually HK's education - no matter 334 or A-level will still be exam-oriented)?

原帖由 kyliema2006 於 10-1-28 17:07 發表
我相信始終有些學生是不太守規則的，但論語境，蔡繼有一定會比傳統學校的好。

二月六日是蔡繼有開放日，若你有興趣，不妨到訪，接觸一下學生。

...

作者: nov03bb 時間: 10-1-28 17:49

我相信是因學生而異, 小兒今年小一, 我問他平常都會用英語溝通, 前兩個月在運動會成班同學一起在閒暇時玩耍, 都是講英文, 偶然有一位用廣東話講,他們又會轉台到廣東話;又在另一課外場合, 都見他們以英語溝通...

原帖由 scotia.nova 於 10-1-28 04:35 PM 發表
kyliema
My friend said the kids in CKY speaks Cantonese in recess time and even in the classroom during their discussion.
Do you know if this is the case? I like CKY but I'm concern if they really ca ...

作者: HeiHeiMa 時間: 10-1-28 23:11

開學初期, 的確有呢個情況! 可能舊年個暑假實在太長, 部份小朋友o係屋企習慣講中文吧!
但個多月後, 情況改善好多! 絶大部份都已經跟學校規定, 講英文/普通話! 可能間中有一兩個講廣東話都唔定, 但我平時返學校所見, 真係冇乜!

原帖由 scotia.nova 於 10-1-28 16:35 發表
kyliema
My friend said the kids in CKY speaks Cantonese in recess time and even in the classroom during their discussion.
Do you know if this is the case? I like CKY but I'm concern if they really ca ...

作者: HeiHeiMa 時間: 10-1-28 23:12

CKY一定行IB, 唔會考local文憑試! 所以放心!

原帖由 kidsmother 於 10-1-28 17:30 發表
Is there any secondary school for CKY? Since CKY is not an IB school, will the students go for local 334 diploma? If they really go for local 334 diploma, are you afraid that they may be behind other ...

作者: elizatyy 時間: 10-1-29 10:31

市場不同。
弘立　ＶＳ　ＧＳＩＳ　/　国際学校
ＣＫＹ　ＶＳ　本地ＤＳＳ/　私立学校

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-1-29 12:39

But it seems CKY is even not a IB candidate school. Did the school release any plan to get IB recognition?

原帖由 HeiHeiMa 於 10-1-28 23:12 發表
CKY一定行IB, 唔會考local文憑試! 所以放心!

作者: father_ho 時間: 10-1-29 13:23 標題: 回覆 11# kidsmother 的文章

Dear kidsmother,

CKY must go for IB since if not, most of the current student will transfer away. During the progression of student, they are now pushing the upper year student to adapt to higher standard in order for the preparation of future Year 10 IGCSE and very likely selecting the suitable one for the IBD study in Year 11 and 12. They just completed the assessment and I compared some major subjects with the local standard, their expectation is in comparable to upper 2 years.

作者: TszYingMama 時間: 10-1-29 23:29

Hi Kyliema,
請問6/2開放日是否6:30PM才開始. TKS!

原帖由 kyliema2006 於 10-1-28 17:07 發表
我相信始終有些學生是不太守規則的，但論語境，蔡繼有一定會比傳統學校的好。

二月六日是蔡繼有開放日，若你有興趣，不妨到訪，接觸一下學生。

...

作者: HeiHeiMa 時間: 10-1-30 21:36

開放日係10am~6pm!

原帖由 TszYingMama 於 10-1-29 23:29 發表
Hi Kyliema,
請問6/2開放日是否6:30PM才開始. TKS!

作者: maccheung 時間: 10-1-31 14:25

係咪任何人士都可參加？
要不要申請？

作者: nov03bb 時間: 10-1-31 14:49

原帖由 maccheung 於 10-1-31 02:25 PM 發表
係咪任何人士都可參加？
要不要申請？

Open to public!

作者: kcPooh 時間: 10-2-1 00:41

Interesting. We applied ISF last year for its foundation year and got accepted. So far, the teaching method and language environment are very attractive. I am sure that the facilities are good for the kids as well. However, the key thing for us to let our daughter to continue her K3 is that we want our daughter to grow with the peers with normal/fair family background or financial standard, not only that are with financially wealthy.
In terms of facilities, I think the campus of CKY is now bigger than ISF which is planning to expand soon.

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-2-1 16:55

Hello kcPooh,

Do you mean that you didn't accept ISF's offer? And go for CKY instead?

原帖由 kcPooh 於 10-2-1 00:41 發表
Interesting. We applied ISF last year for its foundation year and got accepted. So far, the teaching method and language environment are very attractive. I am sure that the facilities are good for the ...

作者: kcPooh 時間: 10-2-2 01:17

This is quite a challenge for us. In fact, we applied to a number of other IS and ISF last year. We decided to keep her at K3 and try the local primary schools as well as CKY. We consider that Chinese is far more important. Glad that CKY is one of our options now. However it is sad that she failed in the one that I liked the most..... :(

原帖由 kidsmother 於 10-2-1 16:55 發表
Hello kcPooh,

Do you mean that you didn't accept ISF's offer? And go for CKY instead?

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-2-2 09:53

Is your daughter going to CKY next year? Or other school? would you mind telling which school you finally chose and the reasons that you chose that school? thanks.

原帖由 kcPooh 於 10-2-2 01:17 發表
This is quite a challenge for us. In fact, we applied to a number of other IS and ISF last year. We decided to keep her at K3 and try the local primary schools as well as CKY. We consider that Chinese ...

作者: kcPooh 時間: 10-2-3 00:05

Ok honestly CKY is at my top preference. Just I still consider that my daughter might take a long time to adapt the environment for her passive character. Thus I just choose between traditional school or intl like school.

One thing that I like ISF is their discipline requirement. Not many people might agree. However, I think discipline training is very important at junior stage.

原帖由 kidsmother 於 10-2-2 09:53 發表
Is your daughter going to CKY next year? Or other school? would you mind telling which school you finally chose and the reasons that you chose that school? thanks.

作者: kidsmother 時間: 10-2-3 10:57

Excluding money factor, I think ISF may be better because at least it is now an IB school whereas CKY is not (except for the logic that it must go for otherwise all students will leave, it seems there is no announced plan how CKY is going to get IB. It seems it is not even a candidate school).

原帖由 kcPooh 於 10-2-3 00:05 發表
Ok honestly CKY is at my top preference. Just I still consider that my daughter might take a long time to adapt the environment for her passive character. Thus I just choose between traditional school ...

作者: papa_pop 時間: 10-2-3 15:58

kidsmother, your concern is valid but if you take a closer look at the timeline, it doesn't strike one by surprise.  Here's my observation:
Once a school applies as a candidate school, it will start to pay. And it will take about a year to get authorisation as an IB World School (pay even more then).
Take DBS as an example, it should start its IBDP in 2010/11 and a so-called foundation year for F4 students this year (2009/10). But I'm not sure if it has been authorised as a World School by IBO.
Take SPCC as another example, it has just secured its candidate school status this year and is planning to start its preparatory year in 2010/11.  Ideally, it will then be authorised in time for its offering of IBDP in 2011/12.
For CKY, its plan is to offer IBDP to its Y11-12 students.  Now the highest year is only Y9.  If the school is cautious about numbers (and I think it should), it could apply for candidate status in 2010/11, then ideally get authorisation as a World School in 2011/12.
Don't confuse IBDP with MYP and PYP. A school may only be eyeing on the IBDP but not the other two IB programmes.

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)