教育王國

標題: 學之園 (灝景) vs SC [打印本頁]

作者: racoy 時間: 09-11-30 15:41 標題: 學之園 (灝景) vs SC

HI.

學之園灝景am 同 SC pm (都係CE 班). 你地會點揀?
我地著重小朋友既英文發展,
如果讀學之園我地個女會舒服D因為我地住青衣同埋am, 下午可以訓下教, 但個學舍好細同冇咁出名
如果揀SC就辛苦d, 要答好耐車, 同埋係pm, 可能冇咁精神. 但係SC就出名d, 升好小學又可能著數d

有冇其他因素需要考慮? 例如師資等等
thanks for your advice in advance!!

Racoy

作者: chingyu 時間: 09-11-30 16:06

please read

http://forum.edu-kingdom.com/vie ... &extra=page%3D2

原帖由 racoy 於 09-11-30 15:41 發表
HI.

學之園灝景am 同 SC pm (都係CE 班). 你地會點揀?
我地著重小朋友既英文發展,
如果讀學之園我地個女會舒服D因為我地住青衣同埋am, 下午可以訓下教, 但個學舍好細同冇咁出名
如果揀SC就辛苦d, 要答好耐車, 同埋 ...

作者: eggmama 時間: 09-11-30 16:13

I may also consider:
1) SC - K2 only pm, K3 only am
LH - keep am till K3
2) peer group, think students/parents of SC and LH (Tsing Yi) would be quite different.
3) $$$ for school bus can save for 1-2 more activities!

原帖由 racoy 於 09-11-30 15:41 發表
HI.

學之園灝景am 同 SC pm (都係CE 班). 你地會點揀?
我地著重小朋友既英文發展,
如果讀學之園我地個女會舒服D因為我地住青衣同埋am, 下午可以訓下教, 但個學舍好細同冇咁出名
如果揀SC就辛苦d, 要答好耐車, 同埋 ...

作者: 眼超超 時間: 09-11-30 16:15

如果係我會留學之園.

因我唔鐘意 ST. Catherine, K2 同 K3 英文唔係 NET 教. 因我比較著重小朋友英文語言環境.

作者: racoy 時間: 09-11-30 16:23

原帖由 眼超超 於 09-11-30 16:15 發表
如果係我會留學之園.

因我唔鐘意 ST. Catherine, K2 同 K3 英文唔係 NET 教. 因我比較著重小朋友英文語言環境.

K2 同 K3 英文唔係 NET??

你唔講我真係唔知喎!!!

作者: racoy 時間: 09-11-30 16:25

原帖由 eggmama 於 09-11-30 16:13 發表
I may also consider:
1) SC - K2 only pm, K3 only am
LH - keep am till K3
2) peer group, think students/parents of SC and LH (Tsing Yi) would be quite different.
3) $$$ for school bus can save for ...

right, monthly expense would be 4500 if including school bus fee!!

作者: cctung 時間: 09-11-30 16:29

LH is good except no outdoor playground, but the campus is clean and tidy.

作者: chingyu 時間: 09-11-30 16:55

If you are talking $$$$$$, I would remind you lot.
SC - 10 months only
LH - more than 10 months as far as I know

Regarding NET, definitely SC offers NET for K2/K3. You may verify with the school for update information.

原帖由 racoy 於 09-11-30 16:23 發表

K2 同 K3 英文唔係 NET?? 你唔講我真係唔知喎!!!

作者: 眼超超 時間: 09-11-30 17:28

原帖由 chingyu 於 09-11-30 16:55 發表
If you are talking $$$$$$, I would remind you lot.
SC - 10 months only
LH - more than 10 months as far as I know

Regarding NET, definitely SC offers NET for K2/K3. You may verify with the school fo ...

sorry, 可能我形容錯誤, 我意思係 SC 唔係有 NET 斑主任, 但係佢地係NET教英文.

作者: racoy 時間: 09-11-30 19:56

原帖由 眼超超 於 09-11-30 17:28 發表

sorry, 可能我形容錯誤, 我意思係 SC 唔係有 NET 斑主任, 但係佢地係NET教英文.

問過人, confirmed 係有net的

作者: Bilobi 時間: 09-12-1 09:32

Regarding teaching quality, SC is absolutely good.
I don't have much knowledge about LT, so cannot comment on LT.

English standard of SC is high, I didn't put my child to English tutorials throughout the 3 years. He manages to speak & write good English.

Another concern is primary admission. If you intend to participate in Gov't "lucky draw", then no difference. For applying to private or direct subsidized school, perhaps SC is better.

Hope the info can help.

作者: ahchungma 時間: 09-12-1 15:57

Without doubt, I would choose SC.

作者: brima 時間: 09-12-1 18:08

SC - definitely have NET class teacher from K1 - K3. They have NET daily. Their good english is unquestioned.

原帖由 眼超超 於 09-11-30 17:28 發表

sorry, 可能我形容錯誤, 我意思係 SC 唔係有 NET 斑主任, 但係佢地係NET教英文.

作者: racoy 時間: 09-12-1 22:56 標題: 回覆 11# Bilobi 的文章

Yes, this helps. thanks a lot!

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)