教育王國
標題: 德望學校 squeeze 45 students in a class!!!!!! [打印本頁]
作者: queeniekl 時間: 09-11-5 11:01 標題: 德望學校 squeeze 45 students in a class!!!!!!
This is terrible. I wonder how the students can concentrate when they are busy chatting with each other. And how the teacher can manage to control and teach the students. The trend is towards small class teaching ie 25 students nowadays. Don't tell me the school just throws the teaching materials and homework to the students and ask them to complete themselves without any adequate supports from the teachers. How the students get enough support from the teacher when he or she has to handle 45 of them. This is really BAD. It's time for Goodhope to review its policy critically.
作者: Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 時間: 09-11-5 11:21
德望係私校，唔啱妳心水咩唔好讀囉，又唔係得佢一間，咁大反應做乜！
作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-11-5 11:34
三国 魏 曹植 《与杨德祖书》：“人各有好尚，兰茝蓀蕙之芳，众人所好，而海畔有逐臭之夫。”
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-5 11:36
Agreed.
I remembered there were 45 students in a class in my days in primary school and secondary school. Those who performed did not have problems wor, most of them got 5As or more.
Good Hope is a school that takes smart, well-disciplined and self-motivated girls. They can concentrate anyway and do not need excess attention from teachers.
Kids require special attention / coaching may better choose schools providing small class.
原帖由 Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 於 09-11-5 11:21 發表 
德望係私校，唔啱妳心水咩唔好讀囉，又唔係得佢一間，咁大反應做乜！
作者: cherryyim 時間: 09-11-5 12:15
Oh really? The class size surprised me!
Then I better go for other schools la. But frankly speaking, how should we expect a 6-year-old kid can sit quietly and pay attention to the teacher? I wonder how the teacher can control 45 kids in a class, while she has to keep the teaching in progress. Given that Good Hope charges $3xxx per month, they must have made alot of money with this arrangement!
作者: Sincelia 時間: 09-11-6 00:58
Agreed!! 
原帖由 Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 於 09-11-5 11:21 發表
德望係私校，唔啱妳心水咩唔好讀囉，又唔係得佢一間，咁大反應做乜！
作者: KK07 時間: 09-11-6 10:04
I think this is not fair to comment that the school make profit cause of admitting 45 kids in a class. Being a private school, the school receives $0 subsidies from government and she has to bear all the expenses. And you can imagine only the maintenance cost of the campus already cost a lot of money.
In my old days, all primary school admitted over 40-45 students in one class. Though the trend is having small class now, I don't see that it must be a failure when the class size is 45.
PS I am not a Good Hope parent
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 10:38
以前，啲人成日話大陸都小班教學啦，點解香港咁落後？但佢地唔知，係大陸嘅重點中小學，因個個都想入，走後門，有權用權，有錢用錢，結果，每班60人或以上。
我阿大讀小學時，每班也40多人。到阿ニ讀時，收生少了，接近40人。我並不感到高興，我反而担心學校收費不足，影响營運。對我，我並未感到多人少人對教育之影响。因為，都係傳统教法，教師講解，学生吸收。
我久不久有去行山，重陽節去行西貢麥里浩第二段。嘩，人山人海，但沿途美景，和平時行山，並無ニ致。阿三騎係爸爸肩上，和另一三唔識七嘅小女孩(都係騎騎係爸爸肩上)比賽馬力，幾開心啊！
作者: kktse66 時間: 09-11-6 10:39
It is a real situation. Some teachers are unable to control the 45 students. Sometimes the teachers may control them with deep loathing because it is a quick method. Thus some of students may dislike their teachers. The students may also hate to learn the subject. If the teacher can't do that, she is unable to control all students keeping quiet and focus. If your kid can't concentrate and keep quiet during lesson, please don't apply the school. Otherwise you and your kid may hate the school. You may think there is no good teacher there.
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-6 11:38
Whether the teacher can take control of the class depends primarily on 2 factors - (1) the ability of the teacher in managing the students and (2) the degree of management attention needed for the students.
If the teacher is not capable enough, he / she would even not able to manage a class with 20+ students.
Besides, I noted majority of those girls accepted by GH are usually self-disciplined and self-motivated. Hence, they do not need a great deal of teacher's management. There may be a few active / talkative girls. However, majority are self-disciplined and they are minority. Hence, it would not be that difficult.
On the other side, I have more concern on the pressure of the teachers as they have to marked homework for a class of over 40 Vs 30+. The workload is quite heavy.
作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-11-6 11:46
传统教法，老师教书，学生吸收，如此做法，学生数目多多都得，大学时候，1个prof对着700人都可以。
问题是你buy不buy而已。
原帖由 judy 於 09-11-6 10:38 發表
以前，啲人成日話大陸都小班教學啦，點解香港咁落後？但佢地唔知，係大陸嘅重點中小學，因個個都想入，走後門，有權用權，有錢用錢，結果，每班60人或以上。
我阿大讀小學時，每班也40多人。到阿ニ讀時，收生少了，接近40人。我並不感到高興，我 ...
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-6 11:56
You are right.
There is no absolute conclusion on whether big class or small class is good. It depends on which one you "buy".
GH has long been positioning itself as a well-established traditional school with far from satisfactory performance record.
The daughter of my friend studies there. She is very self-motivated - her parents have never bothered on her study - homework, test and exam. She would ask or find out by herself if you do not understand or follow.
My boy is totally different. He shouldn't be put in school of this style. Otherwise, I am killing myself.
原帖由 猴子爸 於 09-11-6 11:46 發表
传统教法，老师教书，学生吸收，如此做法，学生数目多多都得，大学时候，1个prof对着700人都可以。
问题是你buy不buy而已。
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 12:11
原帖由 猴子爸 於 09-11-6 11:46 發表
传统教法，老师教书，学生吸收，如此做法，学生数目多多都得，大学时候，1个prof对着700人都可以。
问题是你buy不buy而已。
個Prof有料嘅，一千，一萬人都冇問題。冇料嘅，一對一都浪費時間。
講開依家大學，我嘅子侄依家有幾個讀緊。上課靜靜地聽書抄筆記都預咗，但導修課都係咁噃。分別係導修課講習題而己。
選學校，先選教學方法，選了教學方法，再去理大班小班也不遲。
作者: Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 時間: 09-11-6 12:25
GH is a traditional Catholic primary school where the pupils are trained to be disciplined, well-behaved and decent girls, like other Catholic schools, Sacred Heart, St. Mary, 德雅, etc. Therefore, the teacher is not hard to control them during the lesson.
It can't say GH can make a lot money because she accepted 45 pupils in a class. Please check the facility of GH primary school - she has 30 class rooms, 5 dancing rooms, 10 music rooms, 8 multi-functional rooms, 1 big hall can accommodate >1400 ppl, 1 standard 50M indoor swimming pool, 1 mulit-function playground, 1 library, etc. I am so admire the facilities of GHPS while comparing with other primary school. Comparatively, GHPS's school fee is not high. All these facilities need significant on-going maintenance cost. She has the facilities well better than SPCCPS where the school fee of SPCCPS is HKD 6000/m.
It is not simply depend on the size of the class to comment the school is good or not. And not even from the facilities that the school can provided, but all including the mission, curriculum, teacher ratio, awards and academic results of pupils, etc.
作者: wisekid2007 時間: 09-11-6 12:35
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 12:43
原帖由 Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 於 09-11-6 12:25 發表
GH is a traditional Catholic primary school where the pupils are trained to be disciplined, well-behaved and decent girls, like other Catholic schools, Sacred Heart, St. Mary, 德雅, etc. Therefore, th ...
我都唔明直資點解收咁貴。
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 12:59
原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-11-6 12:35 發表
You are absolutely wrong.
It is absolutely true that small class is better for any types of students.
In fact, your quoted examples exactly illustrated that some students might be less affected by ...
喂，聰明仔的爸爸，
恭喜你，你發明咗"阿媽係女人"之至理。應奪諾XX獎！
"I think no GH parents would reject if GH can offer a smaller class without increasing the school fee."，好正，我估冇德望家長反對。
作者: wisekid2007 時間: 09-11-6 13:17
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: wisekid2007 時間: 09-11-6 13:22
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-11-6 14:10
“问题是你buy不buy而已”
如果全香港德望的目标家长都不喜欢它每班45个人，难道它可以继续下去吗?就是因为它有市场，还可以有成绩，这情形可以继续下去。你不喜欢的话，无所谓，它还有很多客户，事实就是这么简单。
原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-11-6 12:35 發表
You are absolutely wrong.
It is absolutely true that small class is better for any types of students.
In fact, your quoted examples exactly illustrated that some students might be less affected by ...
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-6 15:08
wisekid2007,
Please mind your words. BK provides a platform for idea exchange but not personal attack.
QUOTE
I don't think there will be any stupid parent who will say that a big class is better than a small class.UNQUOTE --- I am indifferent on this as long as the style of my kid fit into it. BUT I am not stupid.
This is the reality and GH has proved there is little adverse and material impact of having big class in the past by its demonstrated academic performance track record. In other words, it has proved the impact is manageable and can be mitigated internally. I don't get from your any valid and provable point backed demonstrated facts that small class is definitely better than big class.
We may just take GH as a product and there are ample substitute products in the market. If you find you do not like a particular brand, you are free to change to another brand at minimal transaction costs. There is nothing wrong with the product.
There are a lot of school providing small class.
GH is not the one and it is definitely not the cup of tea of those prefer small class.
原帖由 wisekid2007 於 09-11-6 12:35 發表
You are absolutely wrong.
It is absolutely true that small class is better for any types of students.
In fact, your quoted examples exactly illustrated that some students might be less affected by ...
作者: Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 時間: 09-11-6 15:33
Agreed. If someone has difference opinion can feel free to share here or if you think that this topic is nonsense, then you can simply quiet and left the discussion forum, but shouldn't finger pointing or criticize others.
作者: queeniekl 時間: 09-11-6 15:46
I'm shocked to find so many people here fail to recongize the importance of small class teaching. There are many reasons for GH parents to choose GH for their children but I very much doubt that a "big class" is one of them. Pupils do need time to think before they are able to answer questions, especially when they are in P1. It is essential to give them sufficient wait time. This will help them become more independent learners. If pupils cannot give appropriate responses because they do not understand the questions, teachers have to rephrase the questions or ask them some closed questions first to build up their knowledge. In other words, teachers have to use processing questions for clarifying or refocusing purposes. Do you think this is possible in a class of 45 pupils? It's still possible but it will definitely strain the teachers. In the case of a smaller classes, it's highly likely that pupils are more capable of giving longer and more relevant answers. Because the class is small, the children rarely have to wait for support or feedback and this ensures that they consistently on task and not distracted. Interactions between the teachers and the children are usually of higher quality.
作者: Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 時間: 09-11-6 16:00
I think not many people discussed here not like small class. However, I have stated my view here that the class size is not a major factor for me to select the school for my child. If two schools accepted my child with all other factors similar except class size, then I will also consider small class size one.
Different people has it own selection criteria/factor in choosing school for their child, so there is nothing wrong or right for the small class size issue.
作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-11-6 16:01
如果你不是德望的家长，你就应该去选小班教学的学校。
如果你是德望的家长，你就应该直接向学校反映，若没结果，就转校，但不需要在这里投诉/埋怨，因为学校没有做一些不公平或针对性的事。
我不举得你讲的理论错，只是不明白有什么意义。是叫人不要读德望吗?我觉得想进去的家长根本不会理会。是叫人明白小班的好处吗?这么明显的道理，那个不明白?
原帖由 queeniekl 於 09-11-6 15:46 發表
I'm shocked to find so many people here fail to recongize the importance of small class teaching. There are many reasons for GH parents to choose GH for their children but I very much doubt that a "bi ...
作者: stjoboldboy 時間: 09-11-6 16:01
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 16:57
I'm shocked to find so many people here fail to recongize the importance of small class teaching.
小唔小班呢樣嘢有排講，前幾年教協迫政府改小班教學，以便安置教師，政府好象設了好幾家做試驗，随着PT上臺，呢絛縮骨仔但求唔使煩，加上經濟好轉，讓全港大部份小學减少收生，才有今天之局面。試驗有冇結果，我唔知。
係唔係小班教育就好，未有定論，起碼很多研究都証明小班教學效果有限，但使錢就多多。至於何謂小班，有人說15人以下オ算。20+嗰啲叫中班。亚洲富有國家，日本，新加坡都是40多人一班(有錯請指正)。
其實，不知是不是港人善忘，十年前，很多名津校都是收45人的，當時收生35，另外10個叫皇帝位。又唔見當年學生比現在差。
當然，現在生少了，個個都係寶，人也越來越自我為中心，以前重點係討論教育效益，現在，係討論照唔顧得足。
作者: CHP 時間: 09-11-6 17:37 標題: 回覆 1# judy 的文章
大班也可以訓練小朋友獨立, 或互相幫助, 因為老師不能事事照顧周到.
作者: wunma 時間: 09-11-6 17:39
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: judy 時間: 09-11-6 17:53
原帖由 wunma 於 09-11-6 17:39 發表
我覺得特殊學校才需要小班教學. 因為這些學生才絕對需要"個別"照顧.
對於一般學校, 小班教學最明顯是減輕老師工作量, 唔可以話冇用, 但對學生成績影響不大. ...
我都係咁諗。所以我舉了我行山一例，人多人少，沿途美景，並無ニ致。但好處是，阿三騎馬，可和另一小女孩比賽馬力。行人少時，好難有人同你癲的。
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-6 17:54
It is important to choose a right school for the kids - considering not only the capability of the kids but also the parents' resources.
作者: Bon_Bon_Pa_Pa 時間: 09-11-6 18:00
冰山一角啫，香港教育制度就係咁。我聽過某Mxx名官津女校，有小朋友被收全家非常閈心好過中六合彩。但惡夢再閈學校而來，功課和测驗都跟唔上，一個月後某一晚，班主任打電話去學生屋企，叫家長幫學生退學因跟唔上。幾冇情，但現實就是這樣。父母應衡量自己小朋友和家長是否有能力和適合讀某些名校，因大部份學校都唔會就哂學生的水平而教，要求家長出力輔助小朋友。香港有很多學校選擇，一定可以為小朋友揀到理想的學校，唔锺意德望咪揀第間囉，最緊要適合你的小朋友，唔係適合大人的意願。
作者: frenchfries 時間: 09-11-6 19:17
其實依家都有唔少學校收生不足, 只有幾個學生一班, 嗰啲成日推祟小班既人應該將佢地既子女送去這些學校. 這些超小班老師對小朋友既照顧可更加周到.
其實, 香港既師資已一直被人疚病. 我想很多人都曾遇過好老師及差老師, 亦感受到他們對我們的影響有幾大. 本來剎校是一個好好既機會汰弱留強. 提高全港老師既質素. 試問你想自己的子女在大班裹給好老師教, 還是在小班裹給差老師教. 好老師就只有那麼多, 小班教學只會減少學生可以遇到好老師既機會.
那些補習天王1個對百幾個, 學生還趨之若鶩. 學生已對需否小班教學投了票.
作者: frenchfries 時間: 09-11-6 19:30
政府如果將用於小班教學既資源用於請一些人幫助老師處理行政工作, 讓老師專心教書. 及提高老師既待遇,以吸引人才加入教書行列, 似乎對學生更有好處
作者: youma 時間: 09-11-6 22:48
原帖由 spiderlily 於 09-11-6 15:08 發表
Please mind your words. BK provides a platform for idea exchange but not personal attack.
QUOTE
I don't think there will be any stupid parent who will say that a big class is better th ...
Agreed.
大班對學習能力較高的小朋友來說, 也有相當好處! 小兒小女都讀大班, 都是人版, 小女更有雙班主任. 
:
作者: Sindy 時間: 09-11-6 22:56
原帖由 frenchfries 於 09-11-6 19:17 發表
其實依家都有唔少學校收生不足, 只有幾個學生一班, 嗰啲成日推祟小班既人應該將佢地既子女送去這些學校. 這些超小班老師對小朋友既照顧可更加周到.
其實, 香港既師資已一直被人疚病. 我想很多人都曾遇過好老師及差 ...
一對百幾既補習天王,d人去係想拎佢地嘔心瀝血貼到既題目,並不是迷信佢地可以幫到佢化腐朽為神奇,如果相信佢地可以化腐朽為神奇的,相信佢地仲未知呢d天皇既用處係乜囉,所以用呢d黎比喻人喜歡大班,似乎講唔通
一個班房既設計,容納40人,都已經好極限,教育局所訂既每班上限人數,係因為消防條例可以容納,有d校長話,一個班房如果收到45人,實際上係唔好,因為班房d有幾個位,係盲點,學生上課都未必睇得清楚黑板
[ 本帖最後由 Sindy 於 09-11-6 22:58 編輯 ]
作者: 哈爾濱 時間: 09-11-9 15:20
bk真係有d家長係有佢講冇人講架, 佢講果d先叫做至理名言, 人地講果d就布唔係架
講番先, 其實我地以前都係幾十個人一班架lar, 有咩問題啫, 讀到書就讀到書, 讀唔到就讀唔到架lar, 唔通小班就可以變9A咩, 攪咁多都唔知做咩鬼, 遲d大把人來香港爭位讀書tim, 邊夠位原帖由 judy 於 09-11-6 16:57 發表
小唔小班呢樣嘢有排講，前幾年教協迫政府改小班教學，以便安置教師，政府好象設了好幾家做試驗，随着PT上臺，呢絛縮骨仔但求唔使煩，加上經濟好轉，讓全港大部份小學减少收生，才有今天之局面。試驗有冇結果，我唔知。
係唔係小班教 ...
作者: onon811 時間: 09-11-9 15:46
我睇見學校資料寫由2009/2010年開始, 實施小班教學wor ?
作者: ziyi 時間: 09-11-9 15:59
那裡看到的?
原帖由 onon811 於 09-11-9 15:46 發表
我睇見學校資料寫由2009/2010年開始, 實施小班教學wor ?
作者: onon811 時間: 09-11-9 16:12
2010小一入學攻略 --- 蘋果日報出版
有無現在就讀小一的學生家長証實一下?
[ 本帖最後由 onon811 於 09-11-9 16:13 編輯 ]
作者: smallegg 時間: 09-11-9 18:03
我囡囡而家讀緊小一，初初知道成45人一班都好驚訝，點handle？到而家讀咗成2個月，發覺我嘅担心係多餘。首先德望係一間歷史悠久嘅學校，難道佢地唔會比我哋更清楚大班/小班嘅好處？我唔知點解會有45人一班，或者45個都係女仔，女仔乖啲冇咁曳容易handle，如果45個男仔我就唔贊成喇
。至於學術方面，囡囡亦都冇跟唔上嘅情況，如果當日上堂乖，老師會叫小朋友寫手冊話今日全班小朋友好乖好安靜 ，等我哋讚吓班小姐，老師們亦好照顧到小朋友需要，同學們亦都懂互相幫助，囡囡讀得好開心。
作者: psyma 時間: 09-11-10 01:04
thanks for ur sharings!
原帖由 smallegg 於 09-11-9 18:03 發表
我囡囡而家讀緊小一，初初知道成45人一班都好驚訝，點handle？到而家讀咗成2個月，發覺我嘅担心係多餘。首先德望係一間歷史悠久嘅學校，難道佢地唔會比我哋更清楚大班/小班嘅好處？我唔知點解會有45人一班，或者45個都係女仔，女仔乖 ...
作者: beautiful_mama 時間: 09-11-10 01:12
That really makes me think twice......
作者: bbmummmy 時間: 09-11-10 08:13
我囡囡都係讀緊GH P1, 我覺得選學校先要睇自己小朋友能力 + 性格, 如需要老師跟得很貼, 當然小班好, 如小朋友性格獨立, 活潑, 容易跟其他小朋友相處, 大班小班都會較易適應.
正如smallegg所講, 我囡囡初入GH時我都有擔心, 怕佢唔適應太多人, 但佢無仲好開心, 成日行街都遇到GH朋友, GH 雖然係45人一班, 但老師可以Handle到. 而且GH 老師很有愛心. 放心.
另外我見有朋友讀其他學校, 係少人D, 30人左右, 但9月P1 開學後已不停有功課, 除平時功課外, 仲要日日做2-3份網上功課, 但GH有功課堂, 暫時不需做網上功課, 有網上閱讀, 但不是強迫. 係呢點, 可能有人會答上網係呢家新學習方法嗎, 早教早識, 網上可聽讀音等!!!
對. 但對我嚟講, 眼睛健康較重要, 上網小朋友好易學, 一教基本已懂, 但日日上網對6, 7歲小朋友視力發展不是太好, 要訓練聽平時上堂老師會講, 再者可買CD, 家長放假同囡囡講故事, 我覺得唔需要日日上網做功課 ?!
另一講法, 呢家好多學校已轉全日, 但仍有少部份係半日, 有人話全日好, 有人話半日好, 有人鐘意男女校, 有人鐘意一條龍男或女校, 例子多的是....
我所言係想講出選學校先要把自己考慮因素LIST 出來, 如功課量, 返學時間, 人數, 授課語言, 愛心, 教學理念等. 再作多方面衡量, 其實大班係幼稚園都有, 根XX, St. CXXX 不是都係大班嗎, 根XXX 更像一間小學般, 但也有很多家長覺我佢哋教我好, 個個人睇法不一嗎 ??? 不要太著意吧. 不喜歡大班, 可以選其他小班教學學校.
另係interview中學校都會選適合自己學校教法和同意學校教學理念嘅學生, 若在 First round 選中, 基本適應無太大問題, 放心.
作者: queeniekl 時間: 09-11-10 08:52
Dear bbmummy,
Thanks for sharing. I feel much relieved after reading your valuable comments. Would you mind telling me more about the volume of homework your daughter needs to do each day. Thanks in advance.原帖由 bbmummmy 於 09-11-10 08:13 發表
我囡囡都係讀緊GH P1, 我覺得選學校先要睇自己小朋友能力 + 性格, 如需要老師跟得很貼, 當然小班好, 如小朋友性格獨立, 活潑, 容易跟其他小朋友相處, 大班小班都會較易適應.
正如smallegg所講, 我囡囡初入GH時我 ...
作者: cy664 時間: 09-11-10 08:57
For existing goodhope parent,
May I have more information realted to school ?
- School bus arrangement
As I find in the BK, a lot of adverse feedback realted to the arrangeent of school bus, the kid need to wake up earlier to take up the bus But the bus arrive the school before opening, is it the truth ?
- Is it all primary students can enter secondary school ?
- How much school fee in secondary fee ?
- Any activities can be taken in school ?
- the volume of homeworks everyday
- no of exam and accessment per year and how many dictation per week
So many question in my mind and hopefully the existing goodhope mom can help me to make the decision.
Million thanks
作者: bbmummmy 時間: 09-11-10 13:09
功課量要視乎小朋友速度, 但GH 規定所有P1 同學不可以参加校內課外活動, (校內課外活動由P2開始才有), 所以同學可用最後一節輔導堂做功課, 功課量暫時每日都係最多8-9樣, 但包括改正, 如果無錯便做少份功課, 之前叫囡囡盡量係學校做, 返家可快D做完就可以做自己喜歡嘅節目, 所以我囡囡通常都係學校做咗大半, 返家只係做20-30分鐘左右, 尋日仲全部係學校做哂, 一般佢都有時間做佢平時喜歡嘅節目, 另要佢日日抽一個多鐘練習piano & viola, 最遲9:15PM 上床.
但如家長要返工, 小朋友又依賴家長才肯做功課, 可能要較長時間適應, 因待家長回家, 都7:00PM, 要食飯又要做功課, 好快已夠鐘瞓覺. 因GH 比較早上堂.
作者: Cara2006 時間: 09-11-10 14:38
在 WISEKID2007 眼中, 他仔的學校最好
以前讀 ESF, 就讚 ESF. 後來轉讀 GSIS, 就開始 "數" ESF. 佢話 ESF 30 人一班, 都太多人, 應該廿幾人一班先得.
話時話, 有網友話 WISEKID2007 現身星期日明報. 如果想學野, 就 CLICK 去睇下
http://happypama.mingpao.com/cfm ... 91108/newa/oka1.txt
作者: spiderlily 時間: 09-11-10 16:14
Interesting, a kid kept on changing school every 2 year 
.
原帖由 Cara2006 於 09-11-10 14:38 發表
在 WISEKID2007 眼中, 他仔的學校最好
以前讀 ESF, 就讚 ESF. 後來轉讀 GSIS, 就開始 "數" ESF. 佢話 ESF 30 人一班, 都太多人, 應該廿幾人一班先得.
話時話, 有網友話 WISEKID2007 現身星期日明報. 如果想學野, ...
作者: Cara2006 時間: 09-11-10 18:20
原帖由 spiderlily 於 09-11-10 16:14 發表
Interesting, a kid kept on changing school every 2 year .
佢自己講, 話個仔有 "學習問題", 在 ESF 跟唔上, 就轉了去 GSIS, 好似話 GSIS 有多 D 資源幫 D 有學習問題的小朋友喎
作者: DodoluMama 時間: 09-11-11 10:49
what is more interesting is as a "高級管理人員", he/she can spend so much time in BK to write long message in different threads!
原帖由 spiderlily 於 09-11-10 16:14 發表
Interesting, a kid kept on changing school every 2 year .
作者: Cara2006 時間: 09-11-11 13:48
讀得 GSIS, 估唔到間屋咁細咁亂, 個仔張書檯竟然放 SOFA 前. 又講到個仔點叻, 話 6 歲睇 HARRY POTTER, 但係書架 D 書, 都係 MAGIC TREE HOUSE, G STILTON 之類嗟嘛. 真係吹水唔抹嘴.
[ 本帖最後由 Cara2006 於 09-11-11 13:50 編輯 ]
作者: edea 時間: 09-11-14 23:23
討論己發展至不理性地對其他會員及小朋友作出嘲諷, 現關上主題.
edea
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |