教育王國
標題: jack and jill 英文, 有冇人讀過 [打印本頁]
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-21 13:41 標題: jack and jill 英文, 有冇人讀過
jack and jill 英文, 有冇人讀過
作者: EDEL 時間: 09-10-21 13:58
My girl has been with Jack & Jill for 3 years already.
What is your question about the school? Please raise up & let us discuss.
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-21 18:31
冇呀, 我都係朋友話呢間幾好, 其實想幫阿女報course學writing 咁, 睇下大家有咩野comment
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-21 23:36
我仲見到佢個到有中文寫作班, 吾知又得吾得
作者: meyonw 時間: 09-10-21 23:57
請問在邊區?
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-22 11:12
kornhill, taikoo and central原帖由 meyonw 於 09-10-21 23:57 發表 
請問在邊區?
作者: conbird 時間: 09-10-23 12:37 標題: Jack n Jill
My son 9 yrs old who is studying in Jack n Jill in Central for 3 mths ( Writing only ) . They just like International School teaching method . Still not yet saw the improvements. But i think Writing need some time to practice..
作者: EDEL 時間: 09-10-24 00:00
In my experience, they are pretty good in those writing courses.
They are having small group. The native English speaking teachers guide the kids before they write. They also learn / cover some words in the writing. Since I can observe a little bit through the glass, I notice the learning atmosphere seems to be good. There is a "little" comment on the pages the kid write in the class - there is a report as well every 6 months (e.g. Feb & Aug).
That's is what I know about Jack & Jill.
P.S. My girl had been in Ready-To-Learn for over 1-2 years before she joined Jack & Jill. Now she is in form 1 & too busy for her new school life, she cannot match the schedule Jack & Jill is having. She is not with Jack & Jill now (maybe she will be back some time later)
原帖由 Little_cy 於 09-10-21 18:31 發表 
冇呀, 我都係朋友話呢間幾好, 其實想幫阿女報course學writing 咁, 睇下大家有咩野comment
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-24 17:08
hi EDEL
thanks for yr comment.
re Ready-To-Learn ? ummm, which one better, my girl is p.2 now. her writing skills is not good, so i want to enroll some courrse for her
原帖由 EDEL 於 09-10-24 00:00 發表 
In my experience, they are pretty good in those writing courses.
They are having small group. The native English speaking teachers guide the kids before they write. They also learn / cover ...
作者: CFaHB 時間: 09-10-25 02:33
My experience, central branch is not good ~
Teachers are too young and change frequently
Play more than learn
and .....
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-25 07:46
CFaHB
thanks
i found their cost quite expensive, around $330 for 1 hr 15 mins, woowww
原帖由 CFaHB 於 09-10-25 02:33 發表 
My experience, central branch is not good ~
Teachers are too young and change frequently
Play more than learn
and .....
作者: EDEL 時間: 09-10-25 16:49
My girl took the course in Kornhill centre. So far, she just needed to change once for the teacher - the previous teacher moved back to UK.
In fact, Jack & Jill also has some small groups for the younger kids - in those groups, they really focus on play (with some learning in the process).....
原帖由 CFaHB 於 09-10-25 02:33 發表 
My experience, central branch is not good ~
Teachers are too young and change frequently
Play more than learn
and .....
作者: EDEL 時間: 09-10-25 16:52
As noted, most of the popular English schools charge similiar price.
$330 for 75 mins = $264 per hour
3 or 4 years ago, Ready-To-Learn charged me $260 per hour already
原帖由 Little_cy 於 09-10-25 07:46 發表 
CFaHB
thanks
i found their cost quite expensive, around $330 for 1 hr 15 mins, woowww
作者: EDEL 時間: 09-10-25 16:58
For writing courses, I believe Jack & Jill is better.
In Ready-To-Learn, based on the experience I got 3 to 4 years ago, they spent some time on communication with the kids - encourage they speak with each other. This can practise their oral skill & basic communication skill in English. They can learn the vocabulary, however, the writing practice is not enough.
That's my understanding based on my old experience.....
原帖由 Little_cy 於 09-10-24 17:08 發表 
hi EDEL
thanks for yr comment.
re Ready-To-Learn ? ummm, which one better, my girl is p.2 now. her writing skills is not good, so i want to enroll some courrse for her
作者: Little_cy 時間: 09-10-26 12:21
EDEL
thanks for info
| 歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) |
Powered by Discuz! X1.5 |