教育王國

標題: 女拔萃DGJS之INTERVIEW (I) [打印本頁]

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-4 18:19 標題: 女拔萃DGJS之INTERVIEW (I)

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: AC2002 時間: 09-10-4 19:34 標題: Thanks for sharing

Thanks for sharing. It seems that you have done in-depth research about the school. I've also heard that DGJS is taking fewer and fewer CCKG kids each year. Do you know why?
Do you know a lot of DGJS parents/teachers or you a parent yourself?
Do you think the school has changed its interview practice this year because they found that the P1 interview class centres have got too much information on how to train the kids to enter DGJS? Or the school found that the students they admitted in the last few years using the old practice could not really reflect the girls' real ability?

作者: Gooddaddy 時間: 09-10-4 20:12

sorry, i don't buy any of your analysis.

1) original form
If they attach so much importance to this, then they are superficial.

2) Birth date - if the girl can demo how smart she is at the interview, the the birth date is irelevant

3)Birth ID - this is a absurd, whoever came up with this idea that person is sick and probably wasn't born in private or public hopsital. LOL

4 photo- only naive people think like this.

5) Address - the logic is flawed.

obviously, you are not an old girl, are you?? But it was interesting to read your essay.

作者: tinkerbell2004 時間: 09-10-4 20:25

It's really an interesting and detailed analysis.

Since facilitating children to enter DGJS or DBS are the ultimate goals for many parents, they will still want to try no matter how difficult is it.

作者: diversity 時間: 09-10-4 20:26

Ms. PhD Ma,
This is really an interesting article. As a matter of fact, may I ask if you are coming fro any interview training class or tutorial organizations looking up for potential clients here? Your analysis is really superficial and shallow, but I do admire your patience in writing it up - an essay!! ha ha

作者: chingmon 時間: 09-10-4 21:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: wootaitai 時間: 09-10-4 21:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: circleda 時間: 09-10-4 23:06

I just wonder how this 'PHD' came up with the idea of 'delink of CCKG' and 'scruntize those childern of learning French'??? But she could surely create fear for a part of the candidates.

作者: nicolemummy 時間: 09-10-4 23:48

PhdJessiema,

No matter whether readers regard the information valuable or not, your effort is definitely appreciated. You don't ask for rewards but detail the information you gathered and analysized. Thank you very much.

Frankly, DGJS is really not my No.1 school - this probably is the only point that I disagree with you (becoz you mentioned that this is No1 dream school among mummies of girls). For the others, although some parents have some comments on it, they represents a 'warning' or 'signal' for us to take the application serious. I enjoy reading it.

Thank you once again.

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 09-10-4 18:19 發表
拔萃之INTERVIEW技巧

We have asked for so many people, and in their heart, HK no. 1 school should be DGJS. This year there are 3 girls got 10As from HKCEE. Thus, every year parents pick this pr ...

作者: sschiu 時間: 09-10-5 00:14

PhdJessiema,

If DGJS is selecting students according to the criteria you wrote, I believe this school is destroying her own future! Just my personal view!

作者: daisy17772 時間: 09-10-5 00:46

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 09-10-4 18:19 發表
拔萃之INTERVIEW技巧

We also figure out some of the must-have techniques during the coming interview. We are still working out and may post here once we refined the points. Also, we are writing a similar passage for DBS. Or, you may leave a message here if you would like to see the draft first. Please state out for boy or girl. Remember, it's just a draft and make your own judgement towards the points. Please finds out the truth by your ownself, including the above passages. ...

I am interested to see your findings in draft, I have both boy and girl. I keep myself open for findings from any source, I will make judgment myself. thanks

作者: magiccandy 時間: 09-10-5 09:09

I also think the findings are innocent and superficial. Top schools really just care one thing: children's background. Good background nurtures children's growth, but of course there are always exceptions.

作者: circleda 時間: 09-10-5 10:09

Regret to say yours are superficial too

原帖由 magiccandy 於 09-10-5 09:09 發表
I also think the findings are innocent and superficial. Top schools really just care one thing: children's background. Good background nurtures children's growth, but of course there are always except ...

作者: Reximom 時間: 09-10-5 10:16

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Gooddaddy 時間: 09-10-5 10:22

I think magiccandy was trying to say that top school pick their students purely based on individual merit but there are always exceptions. I think it's a fair statement not superficial at all.

原帖由 circleda 於 09-10-5 10:09 發表
Regret to say yours are superficial too

作者: magiccandy 時間: 09-10-5 11:37

thanks good daddy for clarifying my point. people may hate realizing that good schools pick children with good background, but that's reality!

作者: Charlotte_mom 時間: 09-10-5 11:53

早幾年(2005啦), dgjs係要親身去排隊, 拎張出世紙copy去拎申請表, 而張表係即時寫埋個名上去的(即non-transferable)
我舊老闆仔女讀spcc, 佢亦同我講, original form同photocopy係有分別的, 仲特登拎左一份original俾我
信與唔信, 就另一件事喇

原帖由 Gooddaddy 於 09-10-4 08:12 PM 發表
sorry, i don't buy any of your analysis.

1) original form
If they attach so much importance to this, then they are superficial.

2) Birth date - if the girl can demo how smart she is at the intervie ...

作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-10-5 11:57

"All in all, there is only one single criteria: SMART! Your girl needs to be classified as genius-type smart."

I agree to this point.

It is difficult to get into those prestigious schools and even more difficult to survive there. It seems that only very smart kids can study confidently and happily in those schools.

In addition, I don't think the points above are totally nonsense. Admission panel may really examine every bit of the whole package. It's just that weighting is another issue. It would be better if the author could assign a weighting % to each point, then the whole thing will become more reasonable.

[ 本帖最後由猴子爸於 09-10-5 12:05 編輯 ]

作者: Gooddaddy 時間: 09-10-5 12:05

In that case, did the applicant of the first person in the queue get accepted by the school? My point is this has nothing to do with the way the school assesses the applicant.

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 09-10-5 11:53 發表
早幾年(2005啦), dgjs係要親身去排隊, 拎張出世紙copy去拎申請表, 而張表係即時寫埋個名上去的(即non-transferable)
我舊老闆仔女讀spcc, 佢亦同我講, original form同photocopy係有分別的, 仲特登拎左一份original ...

作者: sschiu 時間: 09-10-5 12:32

I have a question...if the school prefers students with good family background, why don't they just raise the level of the tuition fees to a certain extent so that only the desirable families will apply? In this way, they can make sure all students come from good families and there is no need to waste manpower to process so many applications and screening.

作者: Reximom 時間: 09-10-5 12:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: mow-mow 時間: 09-10-5 12:53

Yes, I remember those days.
Lots of Phillipino maids waiting outside the school from midnight & the madames coming at 7:45 to take over!
Using the internet is to avoid such scenes, so I doubt very much that the school would give priority to the 'original' application forms.
Otherwise they'll only be encouraging those scenes of overnight queue outside the school again!

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 09-10-5 11:53 發表
早幾年(2005啦), dgjs係要親身去排隊, 拎張出世紙copy去拎申請表, 而張表係即時寫埋個名上去的(即non-transferable)
我舊老闆仔女讀spcc, 佢亦同我講, original form同photocopy係有分別的, 仲特登拎左一份original ...

作者: 凱富路 時間: 09-10-5 13:00

好像有點走火入魔﹐也許拔萃真的需要這樣子吧﹗

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 09-10-4 18:19 發表
拔萃之INTERVIEW技巧

We have asked for so many people, and in their heart, HK no. 1 school should be DGJS. This year there are 3 girls got 10As from HKCEE. Thus, every year parents pick this pr ...

[ 本帖最後由凱富路於 09-10-31 14:02 編輯 ]

作者: Gooddaddy 時間: 09-10-5 14:24

The author forgot to include the followings in her list:

1)Mums carrying LV, Chanel, Prada, Gucci bags will get some bonus points depending whether the bag is the trendiest ones.

2)Dads/mums wearing jeans will get minus 5 points.

3)Dads/mums who walk in like a strutting peacocks will get a "Failed" stamped on their application form prior to the interview.

4)Perfectly groomed couples will earn extra points.

5)Couples who are talking very loud over the mobile while waiting will get minus 5 points.

6)Couples who are coughing without using hankerchief/tissue or wearing masks will be get minus 5 points.

The above points are just as silly as those mentioned by PHD.

作者: 猴子爸 時間: 09-10-5 14:31

"1) Original Form (This year, if you got a form directly from the school, it's just a photocopy. Maybe, you think that is no difference to the printed copy from your own computer. You're 100% wrong. There is a bit difference if you looks into details. Usually, the school prefer the direct taken form to show your eagerness of entrance!)"

When I submitted the application to DBSPD, I noticed that the teacher who saw the original form showed a positive facial expression. Please don't ask me how it looks like, but by intuition I could tell it was something positive. I got the form from the material distributed at the info session. So, maybe this is why it counts a bit.

作者: shiuchen 時間: 09-10-5 14:42

我的愚見是:-
1.可能是早幾年學校的電腦部還未support把申請upload到網上,(事實上,現在還有學校是不可以從網上dowload的.)
2.寫上姓名和要帶birth cert. copy 是不想有人成機炒賣申請表.

原帖由 Charlotte_mom 於 09-10-5 11:53 發表
早幾年(2005啦), dgjs係要親身去排隊, 拎張出世紙copy去拎申請表, 而張表係即時寫埋個名上去的(即non-transferable)
我舊老闆仔女讀spcc, 佢亦同我講, original form同photocopy係有分別的, 仲特登拎左一份original ...

作者: judy 時間: 09-10-5 15:36

原帖由 凱富路 於 09-10-5 13:00 發表
好像有點走火入魔﹐也許拔萃真的需要這樣子吧﹗

同意！仲有一句：魔由心生！

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-5 16:09

Dear PhdJessiema,
not every point you have mentioned i have agreed, however, i was impressed and i did appreciate the reading. thanks for sharing!

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 4/10/2009 18:19 發表
拔萃之INTERVIEW技巧

We have asked for so many people, and in their heart, HK no. 1 school should be DGJS. This year there are 3 girls got 10As from HKCEE. Thus, every year parents pick this pr ...

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-5 16:10

should we all make a photocopy of the down form?!

原帖由 猴子爸 於 5/10/2009 14:31 發表
"1) Original Form (This year, if you got a form directly from the school, it's just a photocopy. Maybe, you think that is no difference to the printed copy from your own computer. You're 100% wrong. T ...

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-5 16:15

if you only know that LV, Chanel, Prada, Gucci bags.... in france are for grandmums....
ladies under 40s would never want to carry one of this....

of cause it's just the case in europe.

原帖由 Gooddaddy 於 5/10/2009 14:24 發表
The author forgot to include the followings in her list:

1)Mums carrying LV, Chanel, Prada, Gucci bags will get some bonus points depending whether the bag is the trendiest ones.

2)Dads/mums wearing ...

作者: babie2 時間: 09-10-5 16:25

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: good-boy 時間: 09-10-5 16:41

I admire your patience in writing it up - an essay!! But the content is too naive...... ha ha

作者: wootaitai 時間: 09-10-5 16:44

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: charlottechan 時間: 09-10-5 16:58

I find there is force in this essay. Of course every school principles deny judging children from background. In reality, it seems to be otherwise in certain cases.
As my family or daughter fails to fulfill quite a no of requirements stated, I'll keep a easy go happy mood to the coming interview.

作者: babie2 時間: 09-10-5 17:32

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-5 18:09

your husband should take one bag as well so can double the points!!!

原帖由 wootaitai 於 5/10/2009 16:44 發表
haha I just bought a new handbag to bring it the interview..

Glad that someone validates my reasoning for bag shopping!

作者: bobbbby 時間: 09-10-5 18:37

拔萃女小學唔係直資小學，係私立小學~~~

原帖由 Reximom 於 09-10-5 12:37 發表

DSS學費受教育局監管, 唔係話加就加!

仲有, 有錢family唔一定等於 good family background!

[ 本帖最後由 bobbbby 於 09-10-5 18:40 編輯 ]

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 18:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:03

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:11

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:22

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:32

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:34

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-5 19:37

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: diversity 時間: 09-10-5 20:49

原帖由 PhdJessiema 於 09-10-5 19:11 發表
You should have your own judgement of my position. I have already explicitly tell my points. I'm really afraid of you. Please read once again my passage. Please. I am sure you would know how wrong you ...

Be relaxed, I never prepare to say sorry to you. By the way, you keep on saying 'WE' and 'US' in your series of replies, does this confirm that your PhD wisdom is actually coming from a 'group' - interview training class / tutorial class...........ha ha!!

作者: wootaitai 時間: 09-10-5 22:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: wootaitai 時間: 09-10-5 22:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: diversity 時間: 09-10-5 23:05 標題: 回覆 48# wootaitai 的文章

interview 技巧, then you got to attend their training class la.... that's what the ultimate aim is for writing up the essay

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-5 23:23

and not any car of cause!
as you got the latest arrival, series Victoria from Hermès.
i'm sure he should as least buy a new Mercedes-Benz class S with full option, or the BMW M5 Sedan or why not an Audi S8 quattro?!?!

:loveliness:

原帖由 wootaitai 於 5/10/2009 22:10 發表
I am afraid he will say lets buy a new car to go to the interview!

作者: chingmon 時間: 09-10-6 00:03

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: Gooddaddy 時間: 09-10-6 10:13

PHDjessie>

So what's in it for you for helping our children to get in DGJS?

作者: justforfunmama 時間: 09-10-6 10:31

我快d去買番個最貴手袋和多卡鑽石, 充吓都好. 各位好友知唔知邊隻牌子最夠照, 邊度鑽石最正, ....真開心, 阿女interview, 阿媽可以狂shopping, 現在最怕學校看不見, 請多幾個保鏢吧....(笑話一則)

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-10-6 10:40

hello justforfunmama,
you are just fortune mama!!!

原帖由 justforfunmama 於 6/10/2009 10:31 發表
我快d去買番個最貴手袋和多卡鑽石, 充吓都好. 各位好友知唔知邊隻牌子最夠照, 邊度鑽石最正, ....真開心, 阿女interview, 阿媽可以狂shopping, 現在最怕學校看不見, 請多幾個保鏢吧....(笑話一則) ...

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:10

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:11

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:14

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-6 18:17

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-10 18:16

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: PhdJessiema 時間: 09-10-19 18:30

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)