教育王國

標題: 高主教 (中學部) [打印本頁]
作者: ladykin    時間: 09-9-6 15:00     標題: 高主教 (中學部)

聽人講高主教中學部好唔得, 教風唔係咁好. 請問有冇人知呢?

我諗緊幫仔仔報小一呀, 麻煩比 d 意見我啦
作者: FungMm    時間: 09-9-7 09:16

係咪真架, 我無收到此news wor?

高主教一向都是著重德行, 簡單來說是比較嚴, 而學術成績亦是高過教育局standard(我找不到有關website, 不過您可check吓, 因之前從教育局看過).  不過中學部係中西區是我需要考慮的因素.

以過來人經驗分享如果要讓小朋友入讀心儀學校, 當然要多聽有經驗人事的comments, 不過一定check清楚不能以訛傳訛.  Good lucky. :)


原帖由 ladykin 於 09-9-6 15:00 發表
聽人講高主教中學部好唔得, 教風唔係咁好. 請問有冇人知呢?

我諗緊幫仔仔報小一呀, 麻煩比 d 意見我啦

[ 本帖最後由 FungMm 於 09-9-7 10:59 編輯 ]
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-9-7 12:49

RC has never intended to be a school only for the excellent.

In our old days when the Secondary Section was still a private school, almost every student could be promoted from the primary section.

Of course, it is difficult for RC to keep this policy nowadays.  However, they still try hard to retain as many internal students as possible.  Thus, it is not stunnig to find the Secondary Section with lot of Band 2 students.
作者: FungMm    時間: 09-9-7 14:29

我有一份是2009學期年中總結首100名中學的資料.  不過不懂什麼upload上, 因是jpg格式.  有無人可以教我點upload la?  Thanks! ops:" />

此rating是根據A-G不同的情況而統計.  而高主教是位於47, 雖不是首20名的名牌中學.  但oveall我都好滿意呀. 尤其在學生畢業後之升學及就業出路有83.4%.:)

[ 本帖最後由 FungMm 於 09-9-7 14:36 編輯 ]
作者: ladykin    時間: 09-9-7 14:31

原帖由 FungMm 於 09-9-7 09:16 發表
係咪真架, 我無收到此news wor?

高主教一向都是著重德行, 簡單來說是比較嚴, 而學術成績亦是高過教育局standard(我找不到有關website, 不過您可check吓, 因之前從教育局看過).  不過中學部係中西區是我需要考慮的因 ...


FungMm,

唔知您仲記唔記得我呢, 早前我都有問過高主教既問題, 因為呢間係我打算幫仔仔報 3 間直資/私校既其中一間   我唔知係咪以訛傳訛, 但係我仔仔個鋼琴老師講既, 佢本身喺國際學校教書, 所以我先想問清楚
作者: FungMm    時間: 09-9-7 14:57

Hi ladykin,

您好, 您一提我有d印象wor!

那您的piano老師有無其它可作介紹?  如果好"行"咁recommend給您首10名的名牌小學, 一定答得大體不會失禮呀嗎.  其實都有好多人問別人那一間小學/中學較好.  其答案好多時我都是根據他本人的age, 環境, 成長及network而回答.

例如我住沙田區好幾間出名的學校, 校風, 教法一定可以略知一二, 相對荃灣, TKO皆是.  好像上年我問別人時(當然是一些好有經驗).  但有d inform都未必合用, 不過可作reference.  尤其他們說一些當年好好亦十分難考的, 我都有為囝囝報考及花很多時間多作了解.

當我們作了最後決定時我亦有實地考察其學校, 確實其校的老師及學生的品德.  當中幸運地有他們口中的名牌小學收了囝囝但我都放棄了而choice RC.  是對是錯?  

我們作為家長不能改變學, 所以一定要小心選擇適合的學校給小朋友.  另一方面只有父母才知道自己小朋友的潛能在那裡.

如我有覆您之前的pm, 我答案都是一樣要找一所適合小朋友本身的學校而不是找一所只是名牌的學校.  

現在距離我囝囝升中學還有慢長的時間, 我當然會留意RC中學部的動向, 不過最重要是讓囝囝適應小學生活, 愛上學, 品德的發展.

SORRY, 可能有些少離題tim! Keep in sharing!  haaaa

原帖由 ladykin 於 09-9-7 14:31 發表


FungMm,

唔知您仲記唔記得我呢, 早前我都有問過高主教既問題, 因為呢間係我打算幫仔仔報 3 間直資/私校既其中一間   我唔知係咪以訛傳訛, 但係我仔仔個鋼琴老師講既, 佢本身喺國際學校教書, 所以我先想問 ...
作者: ladykin    時間: 09-9-7 17:55

原帖由 FungMm 於 09-9-7 14:57 發表
Hi ladykin,

您好, 您一提我有d印象wor!

那您的piano老師有無其它可作介紹?  如果好"行"咁recommend給您首10名的名牌小學, 一定答得大體不會失禮呀嗎.  其實都有好多人問別人那一間小學/中學較好.  其答案好多時 ...


FungMm,

佢冇 recommend 我邊間呀, 因為我住北角, 可以報既都唔多, 其中一間喺九龍, 另多一間喺西環
作者: littlemak    時間: 09-11-22 09:30     標題: 回覆 6# FungMm 的文章

Dear FungMm,
thank you very much for your kind reply. You are always helpful !
your info is detailed and neutral, which is very precious to us,
my son got the offer at RC. still struggling. i also got a lot of very "opposite" opinions of R.C. I don't know why.
RC sec school: some people say it is band 2 bottom! some people say it is band 1 middle!
I checked the school annual report, seems the F5 and F7 results not bad ah! then why some people still saying it is so bad?

by the way, can you pls kindly PM me you list of sec school banding on hand? It is crucial to me to make decision as i have to convince my hubby and my m-in-law side relatives !!! they have a lot to say on this matter !!!
作者: VIRUS    時間: 09-11-22 09:50

[中西區有9間官津學校, 唔係band1英中就係band3中中. 男校英中以英皇同聖若瑟較top, 上年聖若瑟14分有75.92%而英皇就67%. 高主教比聖類斯較好, 前者屬band1中(上年14分有61.45%), 後者屬band2頭(最後一次公佈14分有42.9%). 女校英中以英華同聖士提反較top, 聖士提反上年14分有79.1%, 而英華就冇資料. 但係英華係中西區女生首選, 相信命運同英皇差不多, 會考14分估計都係6x%, 聖嘉勒屬band1尾.

第一階段中六收生, 聖嘉勒中五約157人, 中六有84個位, 結果有5個位剩, 即是有79人夠14分(如果全部原校升讀), 佔50.32%. 而英皇中五約192人, 中六有120個位, 結果有20個位剩, 如果全部人原校升讀, 就有100人夠14分, 佔52.08%. 但係我相信有唔少英皇仔走咗去第二間讀. 整體14分既比例應該同上年差唔多, 都係6x%咁上下. 不過我地唔可以只睇14分既比例, 優良數目都好重要.

Band3中中有2間, 聖士提反堂同梁銶琚. 如果以所剩學位推算. 聖士提反堂14分佔13.13%而梁銶琚佔15%. 兩者似乎唔係差好遠, 但梁銶琚比聖士提反堂早收夠人, 相比之下梁銶琚比聖士提反堂好少少. 如果以我標準去評估, 呢兩間屬band3中.

中西區仲有兩間抽獎直資, 即係聖保羅書院同香港聖瑪加利女書院. 如果根餘額推算, 前者有13個位剩, 14分就佔46.39%, 不過睇番上年佢既學校報告, 有94.4%既中六位係原校升讀, 即大約58%, 所以佢係差過高主教, 但係都好過聖類斯好多. 至於聖瑪加利, 就有20個位剩, 14分推算係25%, 屬band2尾. 當然選學校(尤其是band2尾至band3), 校風都好緊要, 要自己去實地理解, 呢o的工夫唔慳得.

歸納上面既分析, 下面就係中西區學校既排位.

band1頭
聖士提反女子中學 (上年6科14分佔79.1%)
聖若瑟英文書院 (上年6科14分佔75.92%)


band1中
英皇書院 (上年6科14分佔67%)
英華女學校
高主教書院 (上年6科14分佔61.45%)


band1尾
聖保羅書院  (推算上年6科14分約佔58%, 今年46.39%)
聖嘉勒女書院 (推算今年6科14分佔50.32%)

band2頭
聖類斯中學 (最後一次公佈6科14分佔42.9%)

band2尾
香港聖瑪加利女書院 (推算今年6科14分佔25%)


band3中
樂善堂梁銶琚書院 (推算今年6科14分佔15%)
聖士提反堂中學 (推算今年6科14分佔13.13%)


以上資料只供參考.
作者: littlemak    時間: 09-11-22 10:27     標題: 回覆 9# VIRUS 的文章

Dear Virus,
thanks for your quote.
I have read and checked through this link few days ago already. that 's why i have this query:
why RC exam results quite good but still a lot of bad comment from people around me? (e.g. private tution center teachers, kindergarten principle comment, friends living at HK side, ??) and it is one existing primary school parent who told me RC is good but he rank it as band 2 head only for sec school?
I feel so strange and odd?
seems contradict to the fact listed in the public exam results?

what is more,
RC just announced its % for 14 marks or up, for 08/09 year, should be 74.3%!! it should be even better than King's college 07/08 !!

so why ???
作者: waiwaibaba    時間: 09-11-22 11:33

原帖由 littlemak 於 09-11-22 10:27 發表
Dear Virus,
thanks for your quote.
I have read and checked through this link few days ago already. that 's why i have this query:
why RC exam results quite good but still a lot of bad comment from pe ...


Hi
I posted on a thread about SLS vc RC in 小一選校 of latest public exam results stated in their school report and their inter-school sports results. I'd say there has been significant improvement in academic and sports results recently, so the not so positive comments may be based on outdated figures, personal bias, spread of rumours etc...
1 thing encouraging RC was placed overall 6 in the recnt 2009/2010 inter-school D1 swimming competition, the all time high and further improvement over last yr. So, I'd say RC, at least currently, is up and up.
作者: littlemak    時間: 09-11-22 11:44     標題: 回覆 11# waiwaibaba 的文章

Tks so much for sharing.
I rank RC as my top 1-3 choice, after reading all threads here.
Thank you so many moms here (and dads also) for valuable advice.

only concern is far from home and how to convince relatives.

anyone know, if travel by nanny bus, from kowloon tong to RC, taking how long?
作者: norakyng    時間: 09-11-22 12:40

原帖由 waiwaibaba 於 09-11-22 11:33 發表


Hi
I posted on a thread about SLS vc RC in 小一選校 of latest public exam results stated in their school report and their inter-school sports results. I'd say there has been significant improvement  ...


It is correct that RC is up and up now.  
Below is % of students with 14 points or more from
best subjects :

2004 :  45.5%
2006 :  54.5%
2007 :  60.8%
2008 :  61.5%
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-11-23 10:00

I chose RC for my boy coz he is capable in English.

In the meantime, he applied HKGUA as it is within walking distance.  The language subjects are taught by native language speakers (both English and PHT).  They charge about two thousand bucks per month.  A big deal!
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-11-23 12:21

RC is a reasonable choice and don't be overworrying.  At least, kids are well disciplined there in general.

Personally, I think academic result depends largely on the quality of students.  The chart you see today may not apply tomorrow.
作者: waiwaibaba    時間: 09-11-23 14:01

原帖由 johnnyrotten 於 09-11-23 10:00 發表
I chose RC for my boy coz he is capable in English.

In the meantime, he applied HKGUA as it is within walking distance.  The language subjects are taught by native language speakers (both English and ...

Did your kid also accepted by HKUGAP ? If so, what's yr choice?
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-11-23 15:37

HKUGAP is our first choice because of less pressure.  Our son was not admitted in the end.

HKUGAP is very different  from a traditional school.   They don't have any test from P1 to P4 (may be changed).  I heard two years ago their TSA result was mediocre.  May be not pushing hard enough.  However, I have met some of their students on a bus speaking good English and PTH.  Pronounciation is very accurate.

Of course there are other outstanding schools like St. Paul and DBS, but really I don't want to waste my time in doing comparisons.  I selected RC as our second choice as it is above average and more importantly, I am an old boy.  So higher chance and save me from being exhausted.  At least, my wife would not murmur around me.

[ 本帖最後由 johnnyrotten 於 09-11-23 16:13 編輯 ]
作者: 肥仔爸爸    時間: 09-11-29 15:58

secondary school oschestra is also above standard, it got many awards in recent few years, especially HK school music festival, they got champion in recent 2 years!! Harray!!
作者: belle    時間: 09-11-29 16:28

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: norakyng    時間: 09-11-29 17:09

原帖由 belle 於 09-11-29 16:28 發表
For 2009, % of students with 14 points or more  from best subjects is 74.3%
It is quite good.  YOu can check from the following link.

http://www.raimondi.edu.hk/new/document/School_Report_2008_-_2009 ...


Thanks !  It is quite good.  RC should be
band 1 top to band 1 mid if have 74.3% with
14 points or above for HKCEE.
作者: beckylui    時間: 09-11-29 22:59

原帖由 norakyng 於 09-11-29 17:09 發表


Thanks !  It is quite good.  RC should be
band 1 top to band 1 mid if have 74.3% with
14 points or above for HKCEE.

It's really great to hear that!  Thanks Belle & Nora for updating!!
作者: Irene_BB    時間: 09-12-25 17:50

Percentage of students with 14 points or more from the best 6 subjects : 74.3%
Percentage of subject entries with Grade A-C and Level 5*-4 : 52.7%
以上是2009年HKCEE的成績。
其實近二年公開試成績真是好好﹐我想他們行了一些對的政策。
最近聽完中學部講座。(只供小學部六年級家長聽)
作者: rickoricko    時間: 09-12-30 00:55

原帖由 johnnyrotten 於 09-9-7 12:49 發表

In our old days when the Secondary Section was still a private school, almost every student could be promoted from the primary section.

O ...


You were incorrect that almost every student could be promoted from the primary section to the secondary school in the old days.

I was one of the guy who could not be promoted to RC secondary 25 years ago.  I remembered there were over half of the students in the class who could not be promoted to the secondary.

However, I am proud of being studied in the primary school of RC as all students in the old days were trained to be very smart.  Most of them can write and speak flawless English because RC provided a proper training to me when I was very little.   

This fudamental trainning in RC gave me a very strong background and support in my current career.

I have no idea on how the school performs right now.  What I can tell is that the students graduated from RC are all smart boys in the old days.

[ 本帖最後由 rickoricko 於 09-12-30 00:57 編輯 ]
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-12-30 14:34

原帖由 rickoricko 於 09-12-30 00:55 發表


You were incorrect that almost every student could be promoted from the primary section to the secondary school in the old days.

I was one of the guy who could not be promoted to RC secondary 25 ye ...


I refer 'old days' to the year before eighty's.  During mid of 1980s, there was a drastic drop in quality since RC could not have too much say when admitting S1 students.  A lot of students were Band 3 to 5 assigned by the Government.  Their behavior was scary!  I was told by my teacher when returning to Hong Kong.

Pleased to meet another old boy here.

[ 本帖最後由 johnnyrotten 於 09-12-30 15:03 編輯 ]
作者: No.Three    時間: 09-12-30 15:05

Hi johnnyrotten,

How's the status nowaday that you know?
Is there any big change on student quality?
Thanks for your helpful information.


原帖由 johnnyrotten 於 09-12-30 14:34 發表


I refer 'old days' to the year before eighty's.  During mid of 1980s, there was a drastic drop in quality since RC could not have too much say when admitting S1 students.  A lot of students were Ban ...
作者: waiwaibaba    時間: 09-12-30 16:41

原帖由 johnnyrotten 於 09-12-30 14:34 發表


I refer 'old days' to the year before eighty's.  During mid of 1980s, there was a drastic drop in quality since RC could not have too much say when admitting S1 students.  A lot of students were Ban ...


Hi Glad to meet the oldie old "boy" here. Yes I could still remember the pressure of sitting for the Secondary School Entrance Exam then ( 70s) and I even took entrance exam of  a private school as insurance. I think by changing to subsidised school, the academic results did improve then by bringing in some bright guys though the top ones remain mainly "in-house" In my days, about 80-90% went to HKU or universities overseas studying EE, dental, architecture. The top guy at HKAL has 4A and best result at HKCEE was 8A out of 9 subjects. I didn't follow the results of RC until recently when I prepare for my kid's P1 application. I am amazed that RC has improved a lot in inter-school competition in the area of sports and music and I am glad that the 2009 HKCEE results was also quite good. The switch from boys school to co-ed is also, in my opinion, a brilliant decision. I think the school management is heading right direction. Kudos to them
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-12-30 17:22

原帖由 No.Three 於 09-12-30 15:05 發表
Hi johnnyrotten,

How's the status nowaday that you know?
Is there any big change on student quality?
Thanks for your helpful information.


Don't worry about the quality.  Just ask yourself what you would do if RC is not a EMI school.   Very likely, your answer applies to other parents.  Indeed, RC benefits a lot from the limited supply of EMI schools.  It can attract more brilliant students.

By the way, I have two nephews gradutating from RC in 2000s.   They've got 5As, 4As and either Bs or Cs for the rest at HKCE.

[ 本帖最後由 johnnyrotten 於 09-12-30 17:32 編輯 ]
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 09-12-30 17:44

原帖由 waiwaibaba 於 09-12-30 16:41 發表


Hi Glad to meet the oldie old "boy" here. Yes I could still remember the pressure of sitting for the Secondary School Entrance Exam then ( 70s) and I even took entrance exam of  a private school as  ...


I think I am the oldest boy here.

In our days, we didn't take the Secondary School Entrance Exam as the secondary section was still a private school.  It was difficult to get a 'C' at HKCE.  HKAL was not for human being at all!  Only 3 out of 20s in my class were admitted to the HKU or CU.  However, our two best guys snubbed the local University and went to CIT and Standford.
作者: No.Three    時間: 09-12-31 11:43

Haha, one of the two best guys were snubbed is you?  (just kidding)

Thank you so much for your info.

原帖由 johnnyrotten 於 09-12-30 17:44 發表


I think I am the oldest boy here.

In our days, we didn't take the Secondary School Entrance Exam as the secondary section was still a private school.  It was difficult to get a 'C' at HKCE.  HKAL w ...
作者: rayvonne    時間: 10-10-18 09:21

I have just read the school report for 2009-2010. The 2010 HKCEE result, the % of studuent with 14 pts or above is 55.2% and % of grade A to C is 36.2%. As compare to 2009 result, the result is dropped.

What banding for RC?
作者: feipo    時間: 10-10-28 16:32     標題: Does living location matters ?

Just wonder if I live in NT, does it affect the recruitment % of my son ?
作者: wakeup07    時間: 11-6-18 22:50

Sorry, I did hear too many comment from parent who really saw those RC secondary 's hugging girls in public and keep using bad words....

I guess RC Primary is a good school however Secondary .........??

Please advice if you have any relatives did study in RC secondary
作者: TomatoCat    時間: 11-6-19 16:18

What's the % of RC primary student going to RC secondary school?
作者: maxboy    時間: 11-6-19 21:00

有無家長可以答下?!
作者: lukv    時間: 11-6-22 20:02     標題: RC Secondary School Places Allocation Result 2010

Name of School

No. of Students

Allocated to government and aided schools mainly using English as medium of instruction, and direct subsidy scheme schools:
Raimondi College

96

St Paul’s College

9

King’s College

5

Pui Kiu Middle School

5

Queen’s College

3

DSS HKUGA College

2

St Stephen’s College

2

Diocesan Boys’ School

1

Evangel College

1

Hon Wah College

1

Kiangsu-Chekiang College

1

SKH Tang Shiu Kin Secondary School

1

St Paul’s Co-educational College

1

The Chinese Foundation Secondary School

1

YMCA of The Hong Kong Christian College

1

Total :

130

Allocated to Other Schools:
Aberdeen Technical School, Buddhist Wong Fung Ling College,


Confucius Hall Middle School, Lingnan Secondary School,
Lok Sin Tong Leung Kau Kui College, Man Kiu College,
Rosaryhill School, SKH Li Fook Hing Secondary School,
St Joan of Arc Secondary School, St Stephen’s Church College,
TWGH Lee Ching Dea Memorial College
Total :

31

Total number of P.6 students

161

Percentage of students allocated to 1st - 3rd choice

1st Choice

2nd Choice

3rd Choice

Others

77%

3.7%

1.9%

17.4%

作者: maxboy    時間: 11-7-8 11:55

有無人知道今年派成點?

[ 本帖最後由 maxboy 於 11-7-8 13:44 編輯 ]
作者: GCCC1231    時間: 11-8-30 17:53

Let me share my own experience with you. I studied in RC Kindergarten since my 4-yr-old and studied there for more than 16 years upto Form 7 (tracing back to 1993, i.e. nearly 20 years before).
RC Primary School is a private school and i remembered every happy moment! But we did not stress too much on our academic results, we simply played played and played everyday.
RC Secondary School is somewhat 'guaranteed' unless the students were not 'up to standard'.
At the time I was studying in RC Secondary School and from what I recalled, I could rank it a Bottom Band 2 or even Band 3 school, because there were fights every week, fouls everytime (of which I was being one) and undiscinplined students everywhere. That was the rank I ranked RC without regards to the academic results.
I was luckily present a gorgeous year when we (all Form 5 students) totally got more than 100 As in HKCEE. Before that, we had student got 4/5 As in HKALE (when HKASL has yet pronouned) and received scholarship for studying in Cambridge.
For those comment saying RC is bad or not good, I believe they should have knowlege about the bad aspects of RC and they should be 'old' enough to tell you what was done before.
However, I wonder why most (might be all) of you rank a school simply by its academic results? A school should be a mini-society. RC is not a school pushing every students to got As in all subjects!
Teachers there (at the time when I was studying there) had hearts! No matter the student was/were academically good, they still gave their hearts to teach the students.
Please consider carefully if you simply want your kid to have good academic results but at the same time carrying bad manner/behaviour! There are lots of kids like that in HK!
That's what my personal experience from RC!
I was a Raimondian till the end of my life! I am proud of it!
Please every Raimonidan Old-boy speaks for your mother school.

原帖由 wakeup07 於 11-6-18 22:50 發表
Sorry, I did hear too many comment from parent who really saw those RC secondary 's hugging girls in public and keep using bad words....

I guess RC Primary is a good school however Secondary ........ ...
作者: Piyoma    時間: 11-8-30 23:24

原帖由 GCCC1231 於 11-8-30 17:53 發表
Let me share my own experience with you. I studied in RC Kindergarten since my 4-yr-old and studied there for more than 16 years upto Form 7 (tracing back to 1993, i.e. nearly 20 years before).
RC Pri ...


GCCC1231, thank you for your sharing.
You were graduated in RC in 1993, that was over 17 years ago. Have you heard about the latest news in RC secondary school afterwards?
I really want to know whatever the secondary school have any improvement at the students behavior!
Can any fresh graduated students share with us?
作者: GCCC1231    時間: 11-9-6 18:50

I'm afraid the fresh graduate would be too young to visit baby kingdom and parents of fresh graduate would be too old for here.

If you want to know more about Raimondi, why don't you go there around 3:30p (i.e. about the time of off school) or roaming around Central at the appropriate time?



原帖由 Piyoma 於 11-8-30 23:24 發表


GCCC1231, thank you for your sharing.
You were graduated in RC in 1993, that was over 17 years ago. Have you heard about the latest news in RC secondary school afterwards?
I really want to know wha ...
作者: Piyoma    時間: 11-9-8 18:29

I need to pick up my son after 3pm so it is not easier to meet the secondary student at the same time.

Let's me find one day to go up to that school.....

Thanks GCCC1231
作者: johnnyrotten    時間: 11-9-19 15:35

To a very substantial extent, I agree with GCCC1231.  We were not pushed too hard to get A's in public EXAM.  Even if you did poorly in academic, you were never requested to quit school.  That's why I enjoyed my school life.

I smoke when I was sixteen.  I gambled in horse racing too.  It's not that weird in a boys school.

[ 本帖最後由 johnnyrotten 於 11-9-19 15:48 編輯 ]
作者: louiskkchan    時間: 11-9-20 00:49

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
作者: louiskkchan    時間: 11-9-24 00:59

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽



歡迎光臨 教育王國 (/) Powered by Discuz! X1.5