教育王國

標題: Secondary School Places Allocation Results [打印本頁]

作者: vanessamummy 時間: 09-7-7 19:45 標題: Secondary School Places Allocation Results




	Baptist Lui Ming Choi Secondary School		1 student
	Carmel Pak U Secondary School		1 student
	Carmel Secondary School		2 students
	CCC Ming Kei College		5 students
	Christian Alliance Cheng Wing Gee College		1 student
	Diocesan Girls' School		1 student
	Good Hope School		6 students
	Homantin Government Secondary School		1 student
	Immaculate Heart of Mary College		2 students
	Kwok Tak Seng Catholic Secondary School		1 student
	La Salle College		5 students
	Maryknoll Convent School (Sec Section)		1 student
	Marymount Secondary School		8 students
	Methodist College		1 student
	PLK Wu Chung College		1 student
	PLK Laws Foundation College		2 students
	PLK Ngan Po Ling College		12 students
	Pope Paul VI College		1 student
	Queen Elizabeth School		8 students
	Sha Tin Methodist College		2 students
	Shatin Pui Ying College		1 student
	St Francis Xavier's College		6 students
	St Joseph's College		2 students
	St Mark's School		1 student
	St Mary's Canossian College		2 students
	St Paul's Co-educational College		3 students
	St Paul's College		1 student
	St Paul's Convent School		6 students
	St Stephen's College		3 students
	Stewards Pooi Kei College		1 student
	STFA Lee Shau Kee College		1 student
	True Light Girls' College		1 student
	TWGH Wong Fut Nam College		2 students
	Wa Ying College		2 students
	Wah Yan College, Kowloon		7 students
	Ying Wa College		1 student
	Delia Memorial School (Broadway)		1 student
	Delia Memorial School (Hip Wo)		4 students
	ECF Saint Too Canaan College		3 students
	Evangel College		3 students
	Fukien Secondary School		2 students
	HKMA David Li Kwok Po College		4 students
	Lam Tai Fai College		1 student
	St Margaret's Co-Edu Eng Sec & Pri School		2 students
	Tak Sun Secondary School		1 student
	Tsung Tsin Christian Academy		2 students
	YMCA of Hong Kong Christian College		9 students

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-7 21:38

vanessamummy,

Thanks for your first-hand information.

I guess you are current P6 parent.
Is that correct?

Dear all,

At a quick glance, the overall performance of girls seems to be slightly better than that of boys this year when compared to the results of last year.

Normally, there may be a few more cases of “successful knock-door” shortly after the official announcement of the allocation results.

Hope to see some more good news soon.

原帖由 vanessamummy 於 09-7-7 19:45 發表

http://210.0.207.198/images/space.gif[img]http://210.0.207.198/images/space.gifhttp://210.0.207.198/images/space.gif[/img]" border="0"> Baptist ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-7 21:43 編輯 ]

作者: vanessamummy 時間: 09-7-7 22:10

No la, I am just first year's parent. But I am quite concern on the SS allocation.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-7 22:20

vanessamummy,

Oh. ................... I see.

Did not know earlier that this year's S1 allocation results have already been posted on the school website.

Just found it. Thanks.

原帖由 vanessamummy 於 09-7-7 22:10 發表

No la, I am just first year's parent. But I am quite concern on the SS allocation.

作者: kaifu 時間: 09-7-7 23:42

Looking down the school list it seems like only two of them are CMI schools. That means there are 132 students admitted to EMI, around 75%? There are a couple of EMI schools on the list which don't look very appealing though. But overall, I feel that the SSPA looks pretty good. What do you think, Principal?

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-8 00:18

kaifu,

Comparing this year’s results to that of last year, the overall performance is more or less the same whereas girls’ results seems to be slightly better than that of the boys this year.

I believe that the results will be further improved in the years to come.

Keep it up!!

原帖由 kaifu 於 09-7-7 23:42 發表

Looking down the school list it seems like only two of them are CMI schools. That means there are 132 students admitted to EMI, around 75%? There are a couple of EMI schools on the list which don't ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-8 09:42 編輯 ]

作者: S.Potato 時間: 09-7-8 21:21 標題: 回覆 1# principal 的文章

Well done, Camoesians! I am so proud of your great efforts.

I can boldly say very few top schools I have observed can achieve such a good result.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-8 21:50

S. Potato,

Very nice to hear from you again.

You rarely show up these days.
Still busy at taking care of your twins!!

But I know you will very likely show up here every year shortly after the S1 allocation results are announced.

If time permits, please show up more here as we have missed your input for long time.

原帖由 S.Potato 於 09-7-8 21:21 發表

Well done, Camoesians! I am so proud of your great efforts.

I can boldly say very few top schools I have observed can achieve such a good result.

作者: kaifu 時間: 09-7-8 22:52

You are probably true. Just checked the results for the 2 popular YMT religious schools close to TSL. Their EMI school admission rates don't seem to be as high as TSL's.

原帖由 S.Potato 於 09-7-8 21:21 發表
Well done, Camoesians! I am so proud of your great efforts.

I can boldly say very few top schools I have observed can achieve such a good result.

作者: ahchoi 時間: 09-7-8 23:53

I've kept records for past few years and have roughly estimated the no. of students admitted to more well-known EMI schools in past few years. The result is encouraging and is improving. Cheers for all Camoesians.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-9 00:00

ahchoi,

Yes, I have done the same so I can see there has been a continuous improvement over the past few years.

And according to my sixth sense, I believe the results will be further improved in the years to come.

原帖由 ahchoi 於 09-7-8 23:53 發表

I've kept records for past few years and have roughly estimated the no. of students admitted to more well-known EMI schools in past few years. The result is encouraging and is improving. Cheers for al ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-9 00:04 編輯 ]

作者: ahchoi 時間: 09-7-9 00:17

Hi Principal,

I agreed with you too, not ony by senses, but by facts. As you know, one of my girls is in P1, though I'm satisfied with her results, I still find a lot of students ahead of her. There are a lot of bright students in TSL.

Cheers,
Ahchoi

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-9 00:32

ahchoi,

As I do not know the academic results of my child’s classmates so well, I have to rely on my sixth sense.

But if you do have real data/facts on hand, you can then make such assumption with more grounds.

Anyhow, let’s see.

原帖由 ahchoi 於 09-7-9 00:17 發表
Hi Principal,

I agreed with you too, not ony by senses, but by facts. As you know, one of my girls is in P1, though I'm satisfied with her results, I still find a lot of students ahead of her. There ...

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-7-9 13:29

TSL Camoes...

作者: S.Potato 時間: 09-7-9 15:42

Hi, Principal,
You are quite right, actually. I have been extremely busy. As you can see I am very concerned about the "business' of TSL. I really hope the babies can go to the same school as their sister (but money would be a problem).

The allocation results are proof that we have made the right decision by enrolling our kids at TSL.

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-8 21:50 發表
S. Potato,

Very nice to hear from you again.

You rarely show up these days.
Still busy at taking care of your twins!!
But I know you will very likely show up here every year shortly aft ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-9 18:14

S. Potato,

It’s a dilemma.
We all hope that the allocation results can be improved year by year.
However, improving allocation results may attract more applicants in the next few years and the competition may become keener.

Nevertheless, according to my sixth sense, it’s very likely that your two younger kids can also get in.
And my sixth sense is always accurate!!

原帖由 S.Potato 於 09-7-9 15:42 發表

Hi, Principal,
You are quite right, actually. I have been extremely busy. As you can see I am very concerned about the "business' of TSL. I really hope the babies can go to the same school as their si ...

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-7-9 20:00

原帖由 principal 於 9/7/2009 18:14 發表
S. Potato,

It’s a dilemma.
We all hope that the allocation results can be improved year by year.
However, improving allocation results may attract more applicants in the next few years and the compe ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-10 19:03

Dear all,

Are you aware that there was another new update about the S1 allocation results on the school website today?

Some more TSL’s graduates have been admitted to the following secondary schools.

DGS : 1 more to make the total of 2
Heep Yunn : 1
PLK Ngan Po Ling : 4 more to make the total of 16
St. Paul’s College : 2 more to make the total of 3
St. Stephen Girls College : 1
Evangel College : 1 more to make the total of 4
Fukien Secondary School : 3 more to make the total of 5
St. Margaret’s Co-Ed. : 3 more to make the total of 5
Tsung Tsin Christian Academy : 1 more to make the total of 6

Few days ago, I said the allocation results this year are more or less the same as that of last year.
But with the latest update just announced today, I have to change my comment to “this year’s results are the best ever”.

Normally, there will be some good news whenever there is a new update.

We look forward to seeing another new update soon.

Once again, well done, Camoesians!!
We are very proud of your terrific performance this year!!

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-10 19:13 編輯 ]

作者: S.Potato 時間: 09-7-10 19:08

Wow, that is great!

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-10 19:03 發表
Dear all,

Are you aware that there was another new update about the S1 allocation results on the school website today?

Some more TSL’s graduates have been admitted to the following secondary school ...

作者: S.Potato 時間: 09-7-10 20:09

And St. Clare's!
Principal, you have a clear mind. Thx for your info.
I think the results are the best ever for TSL. So far I haven't seen any other schools' results comparable to TSL's. Surely the no. of applicants will skyrocket next year.

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-10 19:03 發表
Dear all,

Are you aware that there was another new update about the S1 allocation results on the school website today?

Some more TSL’s graduates have been admitted to the following secondary school ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-10 20:33

S. Potato,

Yes, I missed St. Clare.

I know the school will announce the first version of the results on the same day when EDB announces the official results.
Usually there will be a second version which will be updated by the school a few days after.
The best way is to print out the first version and do a comparison with the second version and then we will know the new changes clearly.

Now one question comes to my mind is “are the additional results due to successful knock-door in the past three days??”
Some of the schools on the list are very well-known in town.

What do you think??

原帖由 S.Potato 於 09-7-10 20:09 發表

And St. Clare's!
Principal, you have a clear mind. Thx for your info.
I think the results are the best ever for TSL. So far I haven't seen any other schools' results comparable to TSL's. Surely the no ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-11 08:23 編輯 ]

作者: S.Potato 時間: 09-7-10 21:47

I also think it is rather unusual to see students being allocated to schools like DGS at this stage. There might be more good news to come.

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-10 20:33 發表
S. Potato,

Yes, I missed St. Clare.

I know the school will announce the first version of the results on the same day when EDB announces the official results.
Usually there will be a second version w ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-10 22:30

S. Potato,

One possibility is that those TSL pupils were on the waiting list for some time and when some other candidates made the final decision in the past few days so some seats were released and those TSL pupils were being informed to enrol.

Hope there will be another update soon.

原帖由 S.Potato 於 09-7-10 21:47 發表

I also think it is rather unusual to see students being allocated to schools like DGS at this stage. There might be more good news to come.

作者: 木土土 時間: 09-7-10 23:48

我囡囡去年tsl升中,去年班男仔超勁, 全級頭十名得2個女仔, 唔似大部份小學都係女仔叻d, tsl 教學方法男女都適合, 所以有時女仔叻d,有時男仔叻d.

聽聞今年升中女仔叻d

!

overall成績好既tsl女仔升中好穩陣, 因spcs同mms都好喜歡tsl既女仔, 其實今年spcs收tsl既學生比而家公佈既多, 因有幾個之前收咗唔讀無註冊

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-7 21:38 發表
.....
Dear all,

At a quick glance, the overall performance of girls seems to be slightly better than that of boys this year when compared to the results of last year.
...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-11 08:07

木土土,

Thanks for your sharing.

我囡囡去年tsl升中,去年班男仔超勁, 全級頭十名得2個女仔, 唔似大部份小學都係女仔叻d, tsl 教學方法男女都適合, 所以有時女仔叻d,有時男仔叻d.

- Really?? Yes, boys perform better in some years whereas it is the other way around for girls in other years.

聽聞今年升中女仔叻d !

- Yes, it is the case.
And the overall results are the best ever.

overall成績好既tsl女仔升中好穩陣, 因spcs同mms都好喜歡tsl既女仔, 其實今年spcs收tsl既學生比而家公佈既多, 因有幾個之前收咗唔讀無註冊

- Yes, we also notice that.
Many TSL girls are admitted to both SPCS and Marymount every year.

Do you know the ratio of Non-Chinese Students admitted to both SPCS and Marymount? 20-30%?? Or less than that?

SPCS is indeed a very good school.
Do you know what other schools those TSL girls go to when they gave up the seats offered by SPCS?

原帖由 木土土 於 09-7-10 23:48 發表

我囡囡去年tsl升中,去年班男仔超勁, 全級頭十名得2個女仔, 唔似大部份小學都係女仔叻d, tsl 教學方法男女都適合, 所以有時女仔叻d,有時男仔叻d.

聽聞今年升中女仔叻d !

overall成績好既tsl女仔升中好穩陣, ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-11 09:05 編輯 ]

作者: 木土土 時間: 09-7-11 10:49

principal,

- 去年spcs都收咗10個, 有3個non-chinese students, 其中1個non-chinese students無讀去咗marymount

今年spcs都收咗10個, 可能d女仔叻, 有個spcc都收咗, 好似有d係去marymount, 其他唔係好清楚, 我都係聽番黎,d料唔知堅唔堅.

marymount近年都有人叩門入到

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-11 08:07 發表
....
- Yes, we also notice that.
Many TSL girls are admitted to both SPCS and Marymount every year.

Do you know the ratio of Non-Chinese Students admitted to both SPCS and Marymount? 20-30%?? Or less than that?

SPCS is indeed a very good school.
Do you know what other schools those TSL girls go to when they gave up the seats offered by SPCS?
...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-11 12:08

木土土,

Many thanks for your information.

原帖由 木土土 於 09-7-11 10:49 發表

principal,

- 去年spcs都收咗10個, 有3個non-chinese students, 其中1個non-chinese students無讀去咗marymount

今年spcs都收咗10個, 可能d女仔叻, 有個spcc都收咗, 好似有d係去marymount, 其他唔係好清楚, 我 ...

作者: boilermaker 時間: 09-7-11 15:33

looks impressive.

作者: kaifu 時間: 09-7-11 15:45

Assuming that they have 175 P6 students this year, the latest figures (July 10) show that 84% (147) of them are admitted to EMI schools.

Way to go, TSL boys and girls!!!

principal, you must be very proud if you are the real Principal!!

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-7-11 15:51 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-11 17:50

kaifu,

If you are on E.K./B.K. long enough, you should know that I am just a counterfeit!!

Many people know that, though occasionally there will be speculation like that which makes me look rather suspicious!!

If I were the real Principal, I will definitely not use my current login name!!

In this particular case, I am as proud as you on the same footing.

原帖由 kaifu 於 09-7-11 15:45 發表

Assuming that they have 175 P6 students this year, the latest figures (July 10) show that 84% (147) of them are admitted to EMI schools.

Way to go, TSL boys and girls!!!

principal, you must be very ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-12 08:51 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-11 23:06

Principal a counterfeit

Noticed that a few students (at least 6) moved from other schools to what I call the REAL band 1 schools (the old grant schools, mostly with religious background).

I tend to separate the schools under Band 1 into band 1-1, band 1-2 and band 1-3

.

This does not necessarily imply that my own kid can make it, though. Needs a lot more

***

Got the souvenir pack too, fortunately.
Very hard work by the editors and all who were involved.

[ 本帖最後由 Bluestar 於 09-7-11 23:09 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-11 23:10

原帖由 kaifu 於 09-7-11 15:45 發表
Assuming that they have 175 P6 students this year, the latest figures (July 10) show that 84% (147) of them are admitted to EMI schools.

Way to go, TSL boys and girls!!!

principal, you must be very ...

Heard that there were 163 students P6 ==> F1 this year.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-11 23:44

Bluestar,

Principal a counterfeit (this doesn’t sound a very good name to me and it seems to be something from our dear motherland. Also, it spoils my image to a large extent. I still prefer you to address me as
e-Principal which sounds more positive and hope it can avoid any unnecessary misunderstanding/speculation in future).

Noticed that a few students (at least 6) moved from otherschools to what I call the REAL band 1 schools (the old grant schools, mostlywith religious background).

- This is too vague. Would you mind to make it more explicit to us? In case you do not want to post it in public, please PM me.

I tend to separate the schools under Band 1 into band 1-1,band 1-2 and band 1-3.

- The school does not make any classification on this any more.
The results are just raw data for anyone to make his/her own interpretation.
Please do not make it too complicated!!

This does not necessarily imply that my own kid can make it,though.

Needs a lot more.

- Again, according to my very accurate sixth sense, you and your child will make it 2 years later!!
Believe me!!

Got the souvenir pack too, fortunately.
Very hard work by the editors and all who were involved.

- Fully agreed.
I enjoy reading it very much.
And this is a must-buy item every year if anyone wants to know the school better.

Declaration : this is not advertisement, just sincere sharing!

Parents should make their own judgement on whether to buy it or not?

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-11 23:06 發表
Principal a counterfeit

Noticed that a few students (at least 6) moved from other schools to what I call the REAL band 1 schools (the old grant schools, mostly with religious background) ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-12 08:46 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-11 23:54

Bluestar,

From very reliable sources??

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-11 23:10 發表

Heard that there were 163 students P6 ==> F1 this year.

作者: kaifu 時間: 09-7-12 07:36

How about the "virtual principal"?

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-11 23:44 發表
Bluestar,

Principal a counterfeit (this doesn’t sound a very good name to me and it seems to be something from our dear motherland. Also, it will spoil my image to a large extent. I still ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-12 08:39

kaifu,

I still prefer to be addressed as "e-Principal".

原帖由 kaifu 於 09-7-12 07:36 發表

How about the "virtual principal"?

作者: kaifu 時間: 09-7-13 08:59

Sure, our honorable e-Principal.

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-12 08:39 發表
kaifu,

I still prefer to be addressed as "e-Principal".

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 09-7-13 09:00 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-13 12:31

Dear e-Principal,

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-11 23:44 發表
Bluestar,

Principal a counterfeit (this doesn’t sound a very good name to me and it seems to be something from our dear motherland. Also, it spoils my image to a large extent. I sti ...

I was just quoting you ja

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-11 17:50 發表
kaifu,

If you are on E.K./B.K. long enough, you should know that I am just a counterfeit!!

Many people know that, though occasionally there will be speculation like that which makes me l ...

A friend who is a P6 parent said their class teacher told them that this yr there were a total of 163 students for P6 ==> F1.

Re the changes in allocation (7 July vs 10 July)

1 more to DGS
1 more to Heep Yun
1 more to St. Clare's
2 more to St. Paul's College
1 more to St. Stephen's

1 less in Wong Fut Nam
1 less in Carmel Secondary Sch

So there's been a little movement for the better (my ranking).

[ 本帖最後由 Bluestar 於 09-7-13 12:32 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-13 13:24

Bluestar & kaifu,

Thanks.

If you know P6 parent, your information should be correct and first-hand.

Based on such movement, does it mean that the chance for TSL’s graduates on “knock-door” is quite positive?

Any other comments from the P6 parent who you know on this year’s allocation results in general?

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-13 12:31 發表
Dear e-Principal,

I was just quoting you ja

A friend who is a P6 parent said their class teacher told them that this yr there were a total of 163 students for P6 ==> F1.

Re the change ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-13 14:55 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-13 13:32

e-Principal,

No insider info, sorry.

I just tried to "interpret" the publicly available data.

But I DO know that BK is under surveillance by the school.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-13 16:39

Bluestar,

I am not surprised at all as many schools would like to know what parents think on various subjects.

And that’s why I am always so desperate to clarify my identity in order to avoid any unnecessary misunderstanding/speculation!!

E.K./B.K. is a very good platform for TSL parents to gather together and share our views anonymously on different subjects about the school, our children and sometimes make jokes with each other to have fun as a way to relieve our stressful life.

Over the past few years, I have noticed that the school has improved in various aspects following our recommendations here.

I think we should make good use of such platform (as an informal channel) to continue sharing our information here while treat the current e-class as the official channel.

Instead of chatting less, I think we should feel free to express our views here as freedom of speech is one of HK’s core values that we should safeguard to the fullest extent.

Just for controversial comments, we can make use of the PM system which, I believe, should not fall into the scope of the current surveillance system!!

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-13 13:32 發表
e-Principal,

No insider info, sorry.

I just tried to "interpret" the publicly available data.

But I DO know that BK is under surveillance by the school.

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-13 16:59 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-13 22:31

e-Principal,

Well, 1 of the things which should be done better is transparency in the dishing out of conduct grades : what is counted / what is not.

I think (actually I know) of several cases in which parents were

as to why / how their kids got what they did.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-13 23:15

Bluestar,

Your voice is heard!!

Let’s see whether the school will allocate some weightings or marking schemes on the conduct grades (just like how the academic results are counted with different weightings) in the new academic year or not?

I understand that the conduct grades are particularly important for P5 and P6 pupils when they need to apply for good secondary schools.

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-13 22:31 發表
e-Principal,

Well, 1 of the things which should be done better is transparency in the dishing out of conduct grades : what is counted / what is not.

I think (actually I know) of several cases in whi ...

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-14 00:04

Bad eating habbit /eat too slow = conduct B-

Couldn't accept it

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-14 00:11

TINGMUM,

Are you sure the conduct B- is due to "Bad eating habit /eat too slow"??

Or did your kids do something naughty at school that you were not aware of??

原帖由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-14 00:04 發表

Bad eating habbit /eat too slow = conduct B-
Couldn't accept it

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-16 10:47 編輯 ]

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-14 08:26

Did your kid do something naughty at school that you were not aware of??

問過老師, 所有我心目中叫naughty的事他都沒有做,連上堂是否有周身郁的情況都說沒有. 反而GOOD POINTS 有3個. 我真的很不明白如何去RANKING 個 CONDUCT GRADE?

自己好了解自己的小朋友不是搞事的類型, 他讀幼稚園起conduct一直是 A,年年見家長都讚, 舊年學校老師的評語才說是"班中的典範", 今年突然變 B- . 真是很難接受!

作者: 天使麵 時間: 09-7-14 10:41

這幾天我們也為操行之事困擾不安。

老師說小朋友「曳唔係曳」，卻數了很多她對六、七歲人仔應該要達致無瑕的細節......

何為操行？簡單來說最主要是人格和品行吧！

真不曉得是我要求高還是老師要求高。
個人認為B- 已屬於屢勸不改的半個搗蛋型問題學生，只差未有缺點記過......

今晨醒來，突然驚感﹕我們學校的作風不是比較寬容耐性、循循善誘的嗎？

[ 本帖最後由天使麵於 09-7-14 10:58 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-14 10:54

TINGMUM,

In that case, it’s a bit strange.
If your child did not do any “naughty” things and with 3 good points, it should not be B-.

The one you saw on last Friday was only the draft of the academic report and the official one will be issued in September.
Not sure whether you can still lodge an appeal on this or not as the summer holiday has started??

On the other hand, it may be worth training your child to eat a bit faster from now on.

原帖由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-14 08:26 發表

Did your kid do something naughty at school that you were not aware of??

問過老師, 所有我心目中叫naughty的事他都沒有做,連上堂是否有周身郁的情況都說沒有. 反而GOOD POINTS 有3個. 我真的很不明白如何去 ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-14 11:01 編輯 ]

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-14 12:16

個心好沉重, 己跌入谷底!

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-14 12:24

比較寬容耐性、循循善誘

That's what I thought before, and what I experienced recently when I complained of another kid's behaviour.

But from what I heard (on and off over the past year) apparently it is not applied consistently.  There is an overriding human factor.

(Well, I know that the teachers are human, the parents are human, and the kids are human; but the variation is still toooooooo big to swallow.)

It is of particular concern to parents when the kids are in P4+, cos we really need the conduct grades during F1 allocation.

When the kids are smaller, P1 - 3, their behaviour is quite erratic and the teachers don't "know" them well enough.  By the time they are in P4+, well, I expect the teachers to "know" them better.

Some teachers still practise this but not all.  <-- I can only say this.

[ 本帖最後由 Bluestar 於 09-7-14 12:26 編輯 ]

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-14 18:23

天使麵,

還有其他為操行分困擾的小一家長, 我們只不過是其中的兩位. 希望學校可以清楚地講解計分的方式!

作者: 天使麵 時間: 09-7-14 18:51

TINGMUM,
可不可以用good points 抵消那個"B減"？

[ 本帖最後由天使麵於 09-7-14 19:18 編輯 ]

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-15 09:25

天使麵 ,

在學校數年, 見過不少同學的conduct分, 屬於我們這類在老師心中有些不足之處的小朋友, 雖不一定有機會 A, 亦不可能是 B-. 學校一向表示歡迎家長意見,相信會給家長一個回覆.

我己收拾心情, 要小朋友準備下年度的進度.:loveliness:

[ 本帖最後由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-15 10:51 編輯 ]

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-15 10:48

B*,

在今年小六未公布result前有小六學生告知自行己被band 1 學校收左. 我想知升中的自行result 是幾時出? 有些人說是在7月一次性公佈, 你有冇idea?

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-15 11:42

原帖由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-15 10:48 發表
B*,

在今年小六未公布result前有小六學生告知自行己被band 1 學校收左. 我想知升中的自行result 是幾時出? 有些人說是在7月一次性公佈, 你有冇idea?

其實我都未認真去認識個機制
要研究研究

應該係在7月一次性公佈
但可能有d學校偷步
來保證收到一d佢地想收的學生掛

我個advisor去左旅行
要等佢返來問一問

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 11:53

TINGMUM & Bluestar,

I am not aware of any “升中的自行result” announced by the school in the past few years.

So far, we can only see an overall allocation results announced on the school website in early-mid July on the same day when EDB announce the official results and there may be another 1-2 updates several days after when some “successful knock-door” results are known.

Heard from some parents that they may not know exactly whether the allocated seats are a result of “自行” or “lucky draw”?

I am also not familiar with the rules of the game yet and need to get some good advice from parents of senior grades as well.

原帖由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-15 10:48 發表
B*,

在今年小六未公布result前有小六學生告知自行己被band 1 學校收左. 我想知升中的自行result 是幾時出? 有些人說是在7月一次性公佈, 你有冇idea?

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 11:54 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-15 13:57

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 11:53 發表
TINGMUM & Bluestar,

I am not aware of any “升中的自行result” announced by the school in the past few years.

So far, we can only see an overall allocation results announced on the school website in ...

e-Principal,

I don't mean TSL releases allocation results before the official announcement date.

I mean, some secondary schools / teachers of secondary schools MAY inform some parents re allocation results before the official announcement date.

And in some cases those parents who are teachers of secondary schools may have "insider" info .....

And some of my friends said, when we chatted, that some pr schools tend to exhibit some favouratism towards kids whose parents are teachers of certain secondary schools (for quite obvious reasons)......

Too bad I decided NOT to become a teacher.

作者: lovenluck 時間: 09-7-15 13:59

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 11:53 發表
TINGMUM & Bluestar,

I am not aware of any “升中的自行result” announced by the school in the past few years.

So far, we can only see an overall allocation results announced on the school website in ...

Hi, I am a new member, an old boy parent. From my understanding, when kids were attending the interviews, some of them already informed by the shcool that they were accepted. The schools will give you hints normally.

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-15 14:15

lovenluck,

Tks for the clarification.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 14:29

Bluestar,

I don't mean TSL releases allocation results before the official announcement date.

Got it.

I mean, some secondary schools / teachers of secondary schools MAY inform some parents re allocation results before the official announcement date.

Heard about that before.

And in some cases those parents who are teachers of secondary schools may have "insider" info .....

Really??

And some of my friends said, when we chatted, that some pr schools tend to exhibit some favouratism towards kids whose parents are teachers of certain secondary schools (for quite obvious reasons)......

Does it mean that the parents need to declare their occupation when our children fill in the application forms for some secondary schools and may be in a priviledged position if the parents are teachers??

Too bad I decided NOT to become a teacher.

It’s really a pity that you chose not to be an English teacher.

I believe less pupils need to go to tutorial centres if they are your pupils!!

But on the other hand, the HK economy will become less booming because there is lesser demand/business for tutorial centres!!

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-15 13:57 發表

e-Principal,

I don't mean TSL releases allocation results before the official announcement date.

I mean, some secondary schools / teachers of secondary schools MAY inform some parents re allocatio ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 15:46 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 14:58

lovenluck,

Thank you for your information.

As we are very green about the current S1 allocation system, it will be very nice if you could share with us some good tips based on your actual experience if time permits.

One thing I want to know is roughly how many % of TSL pupils can get the seats in either DSS secondary schools or “famous” schools based on good performance at interviews so those pupils already know the results or will be given “some hints” before the official announcement date in July?

Going by the allocation results we can see on the school website, I suspect such % is not low in view of the very wide geographical coverage of the schools on the list.
Does it mean that many TSL pupils already got the seats before July and only about 50% or so will join the “luck draw”?

Thanks in advance.

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 13:59 發表

Hi, I am a new member, an old boy parent. From my understanding, when kids were attending the interviews, some of them already informed by the shcool that they were accepted. The schools will give ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 15:11 編輯 ]

作者: Bluestar 時間: 09-7-15 15:32

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 14:29 發表

And in some cases those parents who are teachers of secondary schools may have "insider" info .....
Really??

O come on, you are not really that naive to believe otherwise

And some of my friends said, when we chatted, that some pr schools tend to exhibit some favouratism towards kids whose parents are teachers of certain secondary schools (for quite obvious reasons)......
Does it mean that the parents need to declare their occupation when our children fill in the application forms for some secondary schools and may be in a priviledged position if the parents are teachers??

Its only a small world ! Will know sooner or later, whether or not there are forms to fill in. Applies particularly to pr sch / sec sch in same "area".

Too bad I decided NOT to become a teacher.

It’s really a pity that you chose not to be an English teacher.

I believe less pupils need to go to tutorial centres if they are your pupils!!

But on the other hand, the HK economy will become less booming because there is lesser demand/business of tutorial centres!!

Come to think of it, if I am a teacher, then even more kids will need to go to tutorial centres !!

So now I'm actually having a divisor effect instead of multiplier effect on the demand for tutotial centres, by NOT beoming a teacher !

I can't even manage my own kid !

A reminder :
Although the sec schools may hint whether the kid is accepted or not, sometimes the parents misinterpret the hint ga !!

[ 本帖最後由 Bluestar 於 09-7-15 15:35 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 15:53

Bluestar,

Although the sec schools may hint whether the kid isaccepted or not, sometimes the parents misinterpret the hint ga !!

- The consequences could be disastrous if the parents misinterpret the hints without back-up for their children!!

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-15 15:32 發表
原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 14:29 發表

And in some cases those parents who are teachers of secondary schools may have "insider" info .....
Really?? ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 16:01 編輯 ]

作者: Heidi媽 時間: 09-7-15 16:07

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lovenluck 時間: 09-7-15 17:33

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 14:58 發表
lovenluck,

Thank you for your information.

As we are very green about the current S1 allocation system, it will be very nice if you could share with us some good tips based on your actual experience ...

Frankly, I do not have much tips to tell. But would be very much happy to share my experience.

As far as I know, the successful percentage for 1st around interview is high for top students (may be the first 20th in form). Eg. SPCC accpeted 10 girls this year and 9 girls last year. Bear in mind that SPCC will take only 50 outsiders each year. That means our school has successfully obtained amost 20% of the places.

作者: lovenluck 時間: 09-7-15 17:44

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 17:33 發表

Frankly, I do not have much tips to tell. But would be very much happy to share my experience.

As far as I know, the successful percentage for 1st around interview is high for top students (may ...

However, some of them gave up the seats of those DSS schools. When they received the result in Apr (some of the DSS school may announce earlier the results), they aleady had the interviews with those subsidy 'famous' schools. Those schools will give you hints eg. 'See you in the next school term', 'We will send you news about the summer class of the school, please think about them and join them' or 'Have you enrolled to DSS school? If yes, don't take it!'...... Parents of course will consider the famous school without paying school fees.

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 18:19

lovenluck,

Thanks for your sharing.

Well done, Camoesians!!

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 17:33 發表

Frankly, I do not have much tips to tell. But would be very much happy to share my experience.

As far as I know, the successful percentage for 1st around interview is high for top students (may ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 18:23

lovenluck,

Thanks for your information on those hints.

'See you in the next school term',

'We will send you news about the summer class of the school, please think about them and join them' or

'Have you enrolled to DSS school? If yes, don't take it!'......

I will put these in my notebook and hope I can hear something like that one day!!

Thanks again.

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 17:44 發表

However, some of them gave up the seats of those DSS schools. When they received the result in Apr (some of the DSS school may announce earlier the results), they aleady had the interviews with tho ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 19:23 編輯 ]

作者: lovenluck 時間: 09-7-15 19:15

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 18:23 發表
lovenluck,

Thanks for your information on those hints.

'See you in the next school term',

'We will send you news about the summer class of the school, please think about them andjoin them' or

'H ...

I'm sorry to make a mistake, it should be SPCS not SPCC.

Last year, Marymount didn't give hints so she lost a lot of our girls. But this year, Marymount learnt...

作者: TINGMUM 時間: 09-7-15 19:24

Heidi媽 ,

好耐冇見你, 是否忙緊個女準備升中 ?

要問的己問過,OFFICAL 時睇下有冇轉機.

明早要出trip, 下星期回港再傾!

[ 本帖最後由 TINGMUM 於 09-7-15 22:24 編輯 ]

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 19:31

lovenluck,

No worries!!

I know it should be SPCS (instead of SPCC) as another ex-TSL parent also shared this information with us few days ago.

I think those hints need to be very obvious (the few examples you quoted to us are very good ones) to parents to ensure that both parties can get the messages correctly.

As pointed out by Bluestar earlier today, if some parents misinterpret such hints without any back-up, it will be big problem for their children.

Under the current system, the schools need to send out such hints very obviously in order not to lose any good pupils.
Ultimately, it will be conducive to both parties.

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 19:15 發表

I'm sorry to make a mistake, it should be SPCS not SPCC.

Last year, Marymount didn't give hints so she lost a lot of our girls. But this year, Marymount learnt...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-15 19:33 編輯 ]

作者: lovenluck 時間: 09-7-15 20:04

原帖由 principal 於 09-7-15 19:31 發表
lovenluck,

No worries!!

I know it should be SPCS (instead of SPCC) as another ex-TSL parent also shared this information with us few days ago.

I think those hints need to be very obvious (the fe ...

Principal,

I agreed with you. That's why most of the students will take the offer from DSS school especially for those top students. We have the cases that after the central allocation result announced, those students accepted by DSS school will go and 'knock door' to the famous subsidy/government schools.

BTW, we have also many successful cases for 'knock door' in the past. TSL is a popular school for most of the students have very good performance in their interviews. School will train them up when in P.5 for presentation skills (all-round training until P.6). So, you don't need to worry about your kids and no need to attend the outside traning classes.

Thanks!

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-15 20:49

lovenluck,

I agreed with you. That's why most of the students will take the offer from DSS school especially for those top students. We have the cases that after the central allocation result announced, those students accepted by DSS school will go and 'knock door' to the famous subsidy/government schools.

- We could see those successful cases being updated on the school website last week.
And we hope there will be some more successful cases to be announced shortly.

BTW, we have also many successful cases for 'knock door' in the past. TSL is a popular school for most of the students have very good performance in their interviews. School will train them up when in P.5 for presentation skills (all-round training until P.6). So, you don't need to worry about your kids and no need to attend the outside traning classes.

- I also heard that the school will provide presentation skills training to our pupils from P5 onwards.

Personally, I do not have much luck in most of the lucky draw so I’d rather apply those schools that will suit my child earlier instead of joining the lucky draw in July.
And that's why I would like to assess how good the chance will be.

Thanks for sharing so much valuable information with us today.

I wish your child a very happy secondary school life, as a continuation of the happy primary school life at TSL.

原帖由 lovenluck 於 09-7-15 20:04 發表

Principal,

I agreed with you. That's why most of the students will take the offer from DSS school especially for those top students. We have the cases that after the central allocation result ann ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-7-16 13:26 編輯 ]

作者: Heidi媽 時間: 09-7-16 08:06

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: elizatyy 時間: 09-7-18 15:39

The results are impressive.

作者: flostangraphy 時間: 09-7-20 11:07

principal,
if you are green..... then i'm not even blue enough...

原帖由 principal 於 15/7/2009 14:58 發表
lovenluck,

Thank you for your information.

As we are very green about the current S1 allocation system, it will be very nice if you could share with us some good tips based on your actual experience ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-20 15:27

flostangraphy,

Being a person with a sense of humour, I don't think blue is an appropriate colour for you.

At most, I would say you are blue-blooded!!

原帖由 flostangraphy 於 09-7-20 11:07 發表

principal,
if you are green..... then i'm not even blue enough...

作者: bkman 時間: 09-7-26 23:31

Total number of graduates this year is 165.
If you satisfied those schools on the list of SSPA result this year, which covered 148/165=89.7% among all students. And actually the list of July 10 is not the most updated one, it should be some minor improvement but not update it thu.

A very satisfied result indeed.

原帖由 Bluestar 於 09-7-13 12:31 發表
Dear e-Principal,

I was just quoting you ja

A friend who is a P6 parent said their class teacher told them that this yr there were a total of 163 students for P6 ==> F1.

Re the change ...

作者: principal 時間: 09-7-27 00:07

bkman,

Thanks a lot for sharing the most updated information with us.

We believe there might still be some more successful cases of “knock-door” and look forward to seeing another new update on the school website soon.

Please come back to TSL threads whenever you have spare time to share some more information with the current TSL parents as we always need some good advice from ex-TSL parents.

Meanwhile, I wish your child a very happy secondary school life.

原帖由 bkman 於 09-7-26 23:31 發表

And actually the list of July 10 is not ...

[ 本帖最後由 principal 於 09-8-15 01:23 編輯 ]

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)