教育王國

標題: 陳守仁second in [打印本頁]

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 00:26 標題: 陳守仁second in

岩岩上網睇左啦...
好開心呀!! 無諗過個仔有機會入300
大家睇左未呀?
祝大家好運!

作者: safarimama 時間: 08-10-29 00:34

唔係600咩? 我個女都好彩入到

原帖由 phoebelau 於 08-10-29 00:26 發表
岩岩上網睇左啦...
好開心呀!! 無諗過個仔有機會入300
大家睇左未呀?
祝大家好運!

[ 本帖最後由 safarimama 於 08-10-29 00:36 編輯 ]

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 01:06

有600人咁多??
但個namelist唔似有咁多喎....
anyway祝大家最後都能夠成功!!

作者: Adriano 時間: 08-10-29 01:15

睇過好似有400倒
真係好希望囝囝入倒

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 08-10-29 01:20

原帖由 Adriano 於 08-10-29 01:15 發表
睇過好似有400倒
真係好希望囝囝入倒

有625人呀! 第二至第九頁有70位/頁, 最尾22個。加埋真係1/4人入呢。

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 01:22 標題: 回覆 # 的文章

咁其實即係收幾多人呀??

作者: 俊賢 時間: 08-10-29 07:35

According to their powerpoint presentation:

No. of School Places
Total: 175
5 x P.1 classes

原帖由 phoebelau 於 08-10-29 01:22 發表
咁其實即係收幾多人呀??

作者: CHIULHJ 時間: 08-10-29 09:01

Hi Silvia Ng,

Please check pm.

原帖由 silvia_ng 於 08-10-29 01:20 發表

有625人呀! 第二至第九頁有70位/頁, 最尾22個。加埋真係1/4人入呢。

作者: Hubert媽 時間: 08-10-29 09:37

請問你們在那裡看到, 我看過學校網頁都找不到.

作者: Venuscheng 時間: 08-10-29 10:08

原帖由 Hubert媽 於 08-10-29 09:37 發表
請問你們在那裡看到, 我看過學校網頁都找不到.

http://210.0.207.198/home/0910second_in_list_upload.pdf

祝成功!

恭喜各位入圍的小朋友, 繼續加油!
我個仔入唔到2nd round. 不過心情好輕鬆.

作者: 烏龍媽咪 時間: 08-10-29 10:17

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: itbaby 時間: 08-10-29 10:17

http://210.0.207.198/home/0910second_in_list_upload.pdf

Good luck!

原帖由 Hubert媽 於 08-10-29 09:37 發表
請問你們在那裡看到, 我看過學校網頁都找不到.

作者: BB6392 時間: 08-10-29 10:18

阿囡無份呀

作者: Hubert媽 時間: 08-10-29 10:37

我個囝都無.

作者: HJ6153 時間: 08-10-29 10:38

我個囡都有2nd interview呀,

我想最後入到小一學位的大約又係25%, 4 揀1差唔多.

作者: sasachu 時間: 08-10-29 11:01

我個女都入到 second In, 好開心！

因好喜歡間學校．

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 08-10-29 12:25

原帖由 CHIULHJ 於 08-10-29 09:01 發表
Hi Silvia Ng,

Please check pm.

覆ED

作者: 231423JY 時間: 08-10-29 13:30

請問你地係讀邊間幼稚園? 佢地有冇關係架, 即係讀邊間機會大d? 同埋佢中一派位大多數派邊間?

作者: shirleyyip04 時間: 08-10-29 15:23

你地有無留意到,點解有d 5個人一組in ,有d 6個人一組in,咁樣會唔會唔係好fair呢?

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 15:29

我留意到我個仔o個組入面有4個都係女仔 (睇d名好明確係女仔名)
其實有無人知2nd in既時候, 會問d咩問題呢?

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 15:37 標題: 回覆 # 的文章

回覆231423jy
我小朋友讀york架! 不過去1st in既時候, 我見到有好多st. cat既小朋友(見到佢地本手冊), 不過我諗同讀邊間幼稚園係無關係架! 中一派位係派返同區既中學, 識得有個岩岩陳守仁畢業既派左去九龍華仁書院 .

[ 本帖最後由 phoebelau 於 08-10-29 15:40 編輯 ]

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-10-29 15:44

My daughter also got 2nd int. She is from Tsung Tsin Kindergarten (International Stream). Don't think is related to any kindergarten but mainly depend on your child ability.

Can I ask if anyone know the different between mainstream and french stream? Can french stream switch back to mainstream if being accepted?

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 08-10-29 15:54

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-10-29 15:44 發表
My daughter also got 2nd int. She is from Tsung Tsin Kindergarten (International Stream). Don't think is related to any kindergarten but mainly depend on your child ability.

Can I ask if anyone kno ...

我仔都係TT喎, 不過我地主流班

作者: WPY 時間: 08-10-29 16:07 標題: TSL2 nd in.

Dear all,
did anyone know that total of application of 1 st in??

WPY

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-29 16:40

The total no. of applicants was around 2500. Those parents should be very proud of their kids for getting shortlisted. The school conducted the interviews mainly in English. They did not look at the profolios which were made by parents. The kids made the acheivements on their own efforts at the interviews, great job!

原帖由 WPY 於 08-10-29 16:07 發表
Dear all,
did anyone know that total of application of 1 st in??

WPY

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-29 16:42 編輯 ]

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-29 16:49

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-29 16:40 發表
The total no. of applicants was around 2500. Those parents should be very proud of their kids for getting shortlisted. The school conducted the interviews mainly in English. They did not look at th ...

我個仔同我講1ST IN時老師比幾幅PICTURE佢, 要佢用英文講個STORY出黎, 中文就叫佢抽一張卡出黎讀, 佢抽到"拍手", 但就唔識讀個拍字喎! 但唔知點解佢出到黎又識同我講佢唔識個"拍"字呢??

作者: ljsze 時間: 08-10-29 17:21

my son also could not read some of the chinese characters during 1st interview.

kaifu

did u submit the profolio to TSL ? i thought it didn't accept any profolio.

[ 本帖最後由 ljsze 於 08-10-29 17:22 編輯 ]

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-29 17:29

No, we did not submit the profolio. What I meant was that TSL did not even bother to look at the children's profolio, and only focused on their interview performance. However, this may not benefit those kids who are equally smart as the good interview performers.
My son did not remember clearly about question(s) which were asked in Chinese. I guess the Chinese question(s) may not account for a lot of marks. He goes to an English kindegarten and around 70% of kids from his school who applied TSL got selected. Their school language environment might have helped them perform well at the interview there.

原帖由 ljsze 於 08-10-29 17:21 發表
my son also could not read some of the chinese characters during 1st interview.

kaifu

did u submit the profolio to TSL ? i thought it didn't accept any profolio.

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-29 18:06 編輯 ]

作者: mike0carman 時間: 08-10-29 18:23 標題: 無心機

我囝囝入到陳守仁2nd int., 可惜同培正面試時間撞期, 而家都唔知點算好, 唉, 真係慘, 上次失落於英華已經好唔開心, 而家有得2nd int. 又去唔到, 真係無奈到嘔~

[ 本帖最後由 mike0carman 於 08-10-29 18:24 編輯 ]

作者: lulu128 時間: 08-10-29 21:29

咁請問有冇人知 sec in...要in d mug??...有冇3rd in 呢? 不過 4/1 都幾難喔!!!!

作者: DaddyShum 時間: 08-10-29 23:02

My son is also granted a chance for the 2nd interview.

Be honest, I am a careless father who did not do too many research on the school before sending the application form ... it is embarrassing to ask, perhaps a little bit late, what makes this school so popular that 2,500 pairs of parents applied this school for their kids?

作者: rowe 時間: 08-10-29 23:09

Hi Kaifu,
can you share which kindergarten does your kid study?

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-29 17:29 發表
No, we did not submit the profolio. What I meant was that TSL did not even bother to look at the children's profolio, and only focused on their interview performance. However, this may not benefit ...

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-30 09:02

I don't want to promote the kindergarten here as there are things we don't like about this school too. We believe it is the language environment that helps our boy and his classmates become comfortable communicating in English. They have two class teachers, one of them is a NET, who is dedicated to their class whole-time. We have a neighbor whose son goes to another kindergarten with the same arrangement, and their son is shortlisted by TSL too. Anyway, Don't underestimate children's abilities to pick up a second language. The best way to do it is to start as early as possible.

原帖由 rowe 於 08-10-29 23:09 發表
Hi Kaifu,
can you share which kindergarten does your kid study?

作者: CHIULHJ 時間: 08-10-30 09:34

Hi DaddyShum,

The followings are some of the reasons why TSL is so popular :

1) teachers are caring
2) most pupils enjoy their school life
3) most pupils are confident
4) extensive English environment
5) low school fee

原帖由 DaddyShum 於 08-10-29 23:02 發表
My son is also granted a chance for the 2nd interview.

Be honest, I am a careless father who did not do too many research on the school before sending the application form ... it is embarrassing to a ...

作者: KadenceCheng 時間: 08-10-30 11:33 標題: 陳守仁 2nd interview

我囡囡都有份2nd interview.

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-10-30 16:28

Hi all,

Can anyone let me know what is the secondary school allocation results of TSL? No information on the school website.

Thanks!

作者: DaddyShum 時間: 08-10-30 16:37

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-10-30 16:28 發表
Hi all,

Can anyone let me know what is the secondary school allocation results of TSL? No information on the school website.

Thanks!

I could see the allocation summary posted on a bulletin board in the waiting area on the ground floor where the "extra" parent waited during the first interview ... there you will also find the samples of the school uniforms pinned on the neighboring boards.

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-30 16:41

This link is found on their website:

http://210.0.207.198/student/0608_SSPA_results_14july.pdf

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-10-30 16:28 發表
Hi all,

Can anyone let me know what is the secondary school allocation results of TSL? No information on the school website.

Thanks!

作者: Heiyingleefamil 時間: 08-10-31 01:26

Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08). That's really makes me think twice on this school.

Any comments??

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-30 16:41 發表
This link is found on their website:

http://210.0.207.198/student/0608_SSPA_results_14july.pdf

作者: Heiyingleefamil 時間: 08-10-31 01:27

Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08). That's really makes me think twice on this school.

Any comments??

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-30 16:41 發表
This link is found on their website:

http://210.0.207.198/student/0608_SSPA_results_14july.pdf

作者: emanthon 時間: 08-10-31 06:32

(2006-2008) is an one year SSPA result posted on 8th July 2008 and revised on 14 July, 2008.

2006-2007 ---> P5 (2nd term)
2007-2008 ---> P6 (1st and the 2nd term)

原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:27 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08). That's really makes me think twice on this school.

Any comments??

作者: ansonl 時間: 08-10-31 09:18

同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成績,我都不敢貿貿然將囝囝送入去。

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-31 09:18

That's a good point. But I would wait until our kids are admitted by this school and have other offers in hand at the same time to make the final decision.

原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:26 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08). That's really makes me think twice on this school.

Any comments??

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-31 09:25

I think TSL only became popular among P1 applicants in the past 3-4 years. The recent graduates were admitted when the school just switched to a DSS.
I also heard that their South Asian students generally are not very academically smart compared to the local students, and their secondary school allocation has not been very satisfactory. Having about 20% of those students, the overall allocation data may not look very impressive. It would be interesting to look at the data for the local students alone, but the school may not be willing to release them as they may be accused of "discrimination".

原帖由 ansonl 於 08-10-31 09:18 發表
同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成 ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 09:27 編輯 ]

作者: Reximom 時間: 08-10-31 09:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: bird-bird 時間: 08-10-31 11:52 標題: 回覆 # 的文章

Totally agree with you. It would be good to see how the Chinese Stream perform in the past years......My daughter got into second interview too, but I have reservation about this school, mainly (1) the Secondary School allocation results were not as impressive as expected, (2) I am not sure what is the cultural difference between South Asian Students and our children, not sure if they will bring good or bad influence to each other........????? any one have comments? do you worry the same too??

作者: kaifu 時間: 08-10-31 12:26

Overall the Chinese students there are very presentable and confident, at least for those who helped out on their Open Day. Interestingly, if 20% of their students are caucasians (instead of South Asians), I guess nobody would be concerned about the "cultural differences". I believe their South Asian students are mainly from middle class family rather than having their dads working as security guards we see on the street everyday. The well-educated south asians and their kids speak fluent english (although with a strong accent). Some work as NET teachers in all levels of schools. A number of them actually hold high-ranking positions in places like where I work!
In general, however, they don't push their kids as much as chinese parents. This may be why they don't perform as good in the exams.

原帖由 bird-bird 於 08-10-31 11:52 發表
Totally agree with you. It would be good to see how the Chinese Stream perform in the past years......My daughter got into second interview too, but I have reservation about this school, mainly (1) t ...

[ 本帖最後由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 12:28 編輯 ]

作者: silvia_ng 時間: 08-10-31 12:38

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-31 12:26 發表
Overall the Chinese students there are very presentable and confident, at least for those who helped out on their Open Day. Interestingly, if 20% of their students are caucasians (instead of South As ...

認同!!!

唔好睇人膚色去界定人!

再者, 升中派位點好, 我都唔敢講自己可以谷到佢去做BAND 1學生。中學可以自行收生考兩間, 有本事自己去考都得啦!

作者: JOSHUA1118 時間: 08-10-31 13:11

我個仔都有份2nd in, 其實大家所講架事情我估每一間學校都發生緊, 不過大家按小朋友及家庭情況去選擇學校, 每一個社會都會有人說好有人說不好, 最重要系小朋友開心健康.

作者: wendyyy 時間: 08-10-31 13:44

My twins also got seats at this schoold last year, however we gave up at the end.

原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-10-31 01:26 發表
Frankly, it's not a very impressive one, and it's quite tricky that it is the result for 2 years (2006-08). That's really makes me think twice on this school.

Any comments??

作者: HJ6153 時間: 08-10-31 16:11

Hi Wendyyy

Can you share with us why you finally give up this school and what's the main reason behind?

作者: henrytanghk 時間: 08-10-31 17:01

請問2nd in.會考D咩呢?

作者: phoebelau 時間: 08-10-31 17:41

我問過早兩年有份second in既朋友, 佢話入到去會叫小朋友用英文介紹自己, 然後砌puzzle, 跟住會叫小朋友形容一下puzzle入面既野
不過我諗考既野可能每年都唔同

作者: minicat 時間: 08-10-31 19:23

原帖由 ansonl 於 08-10-31 09:18 發表
同意Heiyingleefamil的說法。

陳守仁的擇生比例為16:1, 理論上可進入陳守仁都應是精英,但經過6年的教化,派位結果(產出)似乎不太理想。

另一間我有强烈保留的學校就是GT,雖然那些家長一昧唱好,但一日未見會考成 ...

陳守仁轉直資到今年7月畢業係第三屆直資生，唔係六年！讀陳守仁的學生我相信大部分都唔係車望政府派位！看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來！如入得陳守仁我好相信他們第日升中，一樣好似以往師兄師姊一樣在六年後靠自己實力在自行或叩門時努力！我想講講今年叩門都有2個入dbs！1個入喇沙！2個入Sj！2個入華仁！2個入瑪利曼！4個入qes！可能有家長覺得TSL學生叩門不外如是！但我就心感高興！

作者: mamimummy 時間: 08-11-1 00:32

看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來！唔係靠派位!

還有這是基本常識

用來上中學的數據是兩年度的, 即五年級和六年級的成績, 所以是2006-2008年度!(請上教育局網頁check)

而且入TSL是想讀得開心又有d成績, 如果想靠派位, 今時今日就唔應該入31網. 不過如果keep唔到競爭力

, 咁係一條龍就著數d ke

. 但如此下去, 去到社會點競爭

原帖由 minicat 於 08-10-31 19:23 發表

陳守仁轉直資到今年7月畢業係第三屆直資生，唔係六年！讀陳守仁的學生我相信大部分都唔係車望政府派位！看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來！如入得陳守仁我好相信他們第日升中，一樣好似以往師兄師姊一樣在六 ...

[ 本帖最後由 mamimummy 於 08-11-1 00:44 編輯 ]

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-1 15:19

我個仔都入到2nd in. 我都是剛剛先知道.

我太太前兩天已問我有冇上網check TSL結果, 我那時連check都唔想check, 因為1st in時我個仔只係in咗5分鐘, 全部最早行番出來就係佢, 心想一定唔得, 仲以為俾佢呃咗50蚊.

其實我覺得校揀人, 人揀校. 沒offer係手, 任何一間收都要讀, 有其他offers先有得決定讀唔讀邊間邊間...

當然, 最後一間都考唔到o既, 咪大抽獎law.

作者: minicat 時間: 08-11-1 20:03

原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-1 15:19 發表
我個仔都入到2nd in. 我都是剛剛先知道. 我太太前兩天已問我有冇上網check TSL結果, 我那時連check都唔想check, 因為1st in時我個仔只係in咗5分鐘, 全部最早行番出來就係佢, 心想一定唔得, 仲以為俾佢呃咗50蚊. ...

我之前都有同面試後家長講過！往年都有ｄ學生在面試時唔多出聲但到最後都過關或入讀！今年都有咁既情況出現！恭喜家長呀！

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-1 20:51

原帖由 minicat 於 08-11-1 20:03 發表

我之前都有同面試後家長講過！往年都有ｄ學生在面試時唔多出聲但到最後都過關或入讀！今年都有咁既情況出現！恭喜家長呀！

係啦, 如果根據我個仔每次in完俾我個report來看, TSL都算係佢in得較差o既一間. 可能TSL係睇本幼稚園手冊多過睇interview performance...

亦可能根本係運氣...

作者: minicat 時間: 08-11-1 21:03

原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-1 20:51 發表

係啦, 如果根據我個仔每次in完俾我個report來看, TSL都算係佢in得較差o既一間. 可能TSL係睇本幼稚園手冊多過睇interview performance...

亦可能根本係運氣... ...

面試都係想揾一ｄ合心水學生，間間都唔同既！tsl以我所知應該係鍾意ｄ有自信學生！可能你小朋友表現出自信性格！家長！自信性格型小朋友大多都係自小從家長身上學會的！

作者: bird-bird 時間: 08-11-3 10:14

wow, you are all so knowledgable, I haven't done any research for Secordary School yet. THanks for sharing.

But I was thinking, 6 years later, if I still have to worry about Secondary School allocation, or to prepare my daughter for Secondary School interview (like what we are doing now), and prepare to "KNOCK DOOR", I guess this would be a lot of pressure for both the parent and children.

Would this be one of the reason why the twin mother gave up their seats last year??

原帖由 mamimummy 於 08-11-1 00:32 發表
看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來！唔係靠派位!

還有這是基本常識用來上中學的數據是兩年度的, 即五年級和六年級的成績, 所以是2006-2008年度!(請上教育局網頁check)

而且入T ...

作者: lenmama 時間: 08-11-3 10:43

原帖由 bird-bird 於 08-11-3 10:14 發表
wow, you are all so knowledgable, I haven't done any research for Secordary School yet. THanks for sharing.

But I was thinking, 6 years later, if I still have to worry about Secondary School allocati ...

I have the same feeling as you, it is very sad & tired for primary application, if we do again after six years, we will be exhausted again on even harder mission, I really don't want to face again. In fact, I can't sleep well in these 2 months.

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-11-3 12:26

Thanks Kaifu!

It is pretty tricky as other parents said in this chat room. It does not show its actual performance. The number of students got into those top school only one or two. Well.. you need to be the top 5-10% to secure those top school allocations.

Thanks again!

原帖由 kaifu 於 08-10-30 16:41 發表
This link is found on their website:

http://210.0.207.198/student/0608_SSPA_results_14july.pdf

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-3 23:39

你的意思是說TSL學校公布假資料??

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-11-3 12:26 發表
Thanks Kaifu!

It is pretty tricky as other parents said in this chat room. It does not show its actual performance. The number of students got into those top school only one or two. Well.. you nee ...

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-11-4 12:12 標題: 回覆 # 的文章

I do not mean that TSL published untrue information. What I mean is that it is pretty smart to package the school in that sense to attract parents and students. They have rounded the information in two years which you never know how many students did get into the top branded school each year. Again, with two years information together, still the school did not show a very outstanding results like SFA. Well, still it is a different teaching methodology school and we hardly can compare it with SFA. Different school style would suit different student style. This is assured. Every student will get into their wanted school which suit them.

作者: Ben2003 時間: 08-11-4 15:37

For information.

http://www.edb.gov.hk/FileManager/TC/Content_1579/leaflet%202006-2008(chi).pdf

2008 年 9 月入讀中一的一屆，教育统籌局叫做 2006/2008 年度。

Secondary School Places Allocation System (SSPA System)
2006/2008 Cycle

中學學位分配辦法
2006/2008 年度

[ 本帖最後由 Ben2003 於 08-11-4 15:43 編輯 ]

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-4 16:48

據我知06-08年度即係同一年,原因是升中時是合計小五小六兩年成績的.

如果以08年升中派位結果而論, 本人覺得是比SFA還要好些, 因為雖然SFA有9成4升英中率, 但大部份都是升長沙灣英中和寶血會. 以男仔計派拔萃喇沙都是TSL多D.

以上純屬個人看法.

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-11-4 12:12 發表
I do not mean that TSL published untrue information. What I mean is that it is pretty smart to package the school in that sense to attract parents and students. They have rounded the information in ...

作者: EMILY03 時間: 08-11-4 17:01

原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-4 16:48 發表
據我知06-08年度即係同一年,原因是升中時是合計小五小六兩年成績的.

如果以08年升中派位結果而論, 本人覺得是比SFA還要好些, 因為雖然SFA有9成4升英中率, 但大部份都是升長沙灣英中和寶血會. 以男仔計派拔萃喇沙都 ...

SFA 08年升中派位差過之前 , 是因為當年 DBSPD 轉直資, 當中有多於三十位男生由SFA轉去DBSPD, 因此, 08年升中派位咪差咗 . 最受惠咪係 DB 囉 . 所以,SFA 08年畢業生係唔夠 140 人. 而來年 09 年的畢業生也受到這原因都係一樣 140人左右 .

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-4 17:04

啊呀!! 原來還有這個原因!!

原帖由 EMILY03 於 08-11-4 17:01 發表

SFA 08年升中派位差過之前 , 是因為當年 DBSPD 轉直資, 當中有多於三十位男生由SFA轉去DBSPD, 因此, 08年升中派位咪差咗 . 最受惠咪係 DB 囉 . 所以,SFA 08年畢業生係唔夠 140 人. 而來年 09 年的畢業生也受到這原 ...

作者: RemyFu 時間: 08-11-4 19:39 標題: 陳守仁second in

Anyone received the 2nd interview letter from 陳守仁?
Should I call the school if I'm still not receive it on tomorrow?

Remy

作者: AaronMa 時間: 08-11-4 20:37

Interview notification letters will be posted on or before 3 Nov. You will find the Parent’s Copy and the Student’s Copy (with labels attached) enclosed.

If you still have not received the letter in the evening on 5 Nov, please call our General Office on 2367 3318 on 6 Nov.

作者: ryohga 時間: 08-11-5 19:24

Just for information, my child has received the 2nd interview notification letter today.

作者: alisoncheung 時間: 08-11-6 22:13

me too.

原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-5 19:24 發表
Just for information, my child has received the 2nd interview notification letter today.

作者: Cathleen 時間: 08-11-7 00:41

i want to know is it all rejected kids have get back return envelop from TSL? because i haven't got back but my friends have?

作者: Kitkit01 時間: 08-11-7 12:48

明天2nd interview各位加油努力,祝成功:loveliness:

作者: thomas_dad 時間: 08-11-7 13:31

Yes, I did receive the notification of unsuccessful application as well as the unused envelope.

原帖由 Cathleen 於 08-11-7 00:41 發表
i want to know is it all rejected kids have get back return envelop from TSL? because i haven't got back but my friends have?

作者: OLDOLDMUM 時間: 08-11-8 20:29

Minicat

小女是今年7月畢業的tsl學生, 我想更正你的消息, 今年所有入讀QES,ST JOSEPH 及DBS的學生都是從自行報名及電腦抽籤而入讀, 我們在學校放榜當日, 己經即時恭賀他們,而不是如你說的一樣, 至於其他數間學校, 的確是有學生在放榜後, 再去報名.

原帖由 minicat 於 08-10-31 19:23 發表

陳守仁轉直資到今年7月畢業係第三屆直資生，唔係六年！讀陳守仁的學生我相信大部分都唔係車望政府派位！看看升中學校名就知大多數都係靠學生自己爭取得來！如入得陳守仁我好相信他們第日升中，一樣好似以往師兄師姊一樣在六 ...

作者: Heiyingleefamil 時間: 08-11-9 23:37

OLDOLDMUM, can you share your opinion about studying in TSL??

原帖由 OLDOLDMUM 於 08-11-8 20:29 發表
Minicat

小女是今年7月畢業的tsl學生, 我想更正你的消息, 今年所有入讀QES,ST JOSEPH 及DBS的學生都是從自行報名及電腦抽籤而入讀, 我們在學校放榜當日, 己經即時恭賀他們,而不是如你說的一樣, 至於其他數間學校, ...

作者: OLDOLDMUM 時間: 08-11-11 21:26

Heiyingleefamil

小學一覽的tsl內, 有一篇'六年有感'是我的六年內的分享, 你有空可以一看, 希望對你有用.

原帖由 Heiyingleefamil 於 08-11-9 23:37 發表
OLDOLDMUM, can you share your opinion about studying in TSL??

作者: youma 時間: 08-11-11 21:59

原帖由 ryohga 於 08-11-4 16:48 發表
... 如果以08年升中派位結果而論, 本人覺得是比SFA還要好些, 因為雖然SFA有9成4升英中率, 但大部份都是升長沙灣英中和寶血會....

不要小看寶血會(上智), 在深水埗幾有名, 整體會考成績拍得住st mary, 德望, 真光, 英華女, Marymount, St. Stephen Girls 等名女校.

作者: mamimummy 時間: 08-11-11 23:52

但SFA入上智大部份因同區派位入, SFA誇網自行的優勢已不比當年.

原帖由 youma 於 08-11-11 21:59 發表

不要小看寶血會(上智), 在深水埗幾有名, 整體會考成績拍得住st mary, 德望, 真光, 英華女, Marymount, St. Stephen Girls 等名女校.

作者: wendyyy 時間: 08-11-12 03:37

可否告知為何 sfa 誇網自行優勢已不比當年 ?

[quote]原帖由 mamimummy 於 08-11-11 23:52 發表

但SFA入上智大部份因同區派位入, SFA誇網自行的優勢已不比當年.

作者: bird-bird 時間: 08-11-12 10:07

I have heard 寶血會(上智) is good academically but not so good in conduct and morale.....I really that if my daughter goes into SFA and will not be able to get into a good secondary school........

原帖由 youma 於 08-11-11 21:59 發表

不要小看在深水埗幾有名, 整體會考成績拍得住st mary, 德望, 真光, 英華女, Marymount, St. Stephen Girls 等名女校.

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-11-13 21:58

Hi anyone knows when will the result be out? Will it out before the Gov't Luck draw?

thanks!

作者: Mamahui 時間: 08-11-13 22:49

原帖由 Monghar 於 08-11-13 21:58 發表
Hi anyone knows when will the result be out? Will it out before the Gov't Luck draw?

thanks!

24 Nov which is same day as the lucky draw.

Good luck to all our kids.

Worryyyyyyy

作者: Monghar 時間: 08-11-14 16:51

Thanks for telling me the results information!

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)