教育王國

標題: 大家覺得培橋ok嗎?是否很難入? [打印本頁]

作者: lulu128 時間: 08-5-18 03:26 標題: 大家覺得培橋ok嗎?是否很難入?

今年到我la

作者: mmak 時間: 08-5-18 14:46

聽講真是很難入的...
interview 要用普通話 & 英文...
我已經幫個女報左普通話已讀左半年, 佢英文聽、講、讀都OK...

你準備好未...??

原文章由 lulu128 於 08-5-18 03:26 發表
今年到我la

作者: ho_fish 時間: 08-5-19 00:51

校長話佢地鍾意收d坐唔定既小朋友

原文章由 mmak 於 08-5-18 14:46 發表
聽講真是很難入的...
interview 要用普通話 & 英文...
我已經幫個女報左普通話已讀左半年, 佢英文聽、講、讀都OK...

你準備好未...??

作者: lulu128 時間: 08-5-19 01:33

吓!! 我個仔唔識wo....死梗....但想知呢間學校好唔好呢? 因我都知佢比較free, 所以d仔都比較百厭的....

作者: mmak 時間: 08-5-19 02:57

聽講無咩功課, 教法好似國際學校... 我都唔係太清楚..
interview 時, 普通話你囝就算唔識講,都要識聽....
沙田區直資得1-2間, 人考我又去考咯...

原文章由 lulu128 於 08-5-19 01:33 發表
吓!! 我個仔唔識wo....死梗....但想知呢間學校好唔好呢? 因我都知佢比較free, 所以d仔都比較百厭的....

[ 本文章最後由 mmak 於 08-5-19 02:59 編輯 ]

作者: tty2908 時間: 08-5-19 18:56

http://forum.baby-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=997408

Seems ...

作者: 已刪除用戶 時間: 08-5-19 19:15

好幾次去朗誦比賽都遇到培僑學生, 佢地俾我印象唔錯wor, 醒目, outspoken
我又唔覺佢地曳wor, 我女都係讀呢d所謂新思維學校, 如果你想小朋友知規守禮坐定定, 咁呢類學校真係唔arm, 佢地會俾小朋友好多空間去錯的, 當然錯完會有consequence, 不過小朋友唔怕去試lor
我唔知培僑係咪咁, 不過我女果間, 師生關係好融洽的, 主任俾小朋友叫花名(當然係善意啦)仲好開心話一聽到就唸起d快樂回憶wor

都係果句, 揀學校係玩matching, 最緊要了解清楚, 覺得適唔適合先啦(both for你&小朋友)

原文章由 tty2908 於 08-5-19 06:56 PM 發表
http://forum.baby-kingdom.com/viewthread.php?tid=997408

Seems ...

作者: tty2908 時間: 08-5-19 23:27

原文章由 Charlotte_mom 於 08-5-19 19:15 發表
好幾次去朗誦比賽都遇到培僑學生, 佢地俾我印象唔錯wor, 醒目, outspoken
我又唔覺佢地曳wor, 我女都係讀呢d所謂新思維學校, 如果你想小朋友知規守禮坐定定, 咁呢類學校真係唔arm, 佢地會俾小朋友好多空間去錯的, ...

如果揀去朗誦比賽都坐唔定,跳跳紥就真係不堪想像囉.

希望唔係好好似網上傳聞咁話佢地係大圍出哂名成日打交啦.

作者: ho_fish 時間: 08-5-23 00:18

我諗揀學校最緊要係間學校啱唔啱自己小朋友既性格, 同埋啱唔啱家長既理念, 千祈唔好人地話好就去考, 最好o係去參加學校攪既開放日等等既活動, 去瞭解下間學校同校長。

去朗誦比賽同坐唔定o係兩樣野黎架, 坐唔定同跳跳紮係性格黎既, 無規定小朋友去參加朗誦比賽唔可以有呢種性格架。

btw, 名校如皇仁都有學生打交, 做小偷, 我諗呢個係個人既問題, 父母點教都好重要, 唔可以完全依賴學校既。

原文章由 tty2908 於 08-5-19 23:27 發表

如果揀去朗誦比賽都坐唔定,跳跳紥就真係不堪想像囉.

希望唔係好好似網上傳聞咁話佢地係大圍出哂名成日打交啦.

作者: ha! 時間: 08-5-28 23:29

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: tty2908 時間: 08-5-29 19:15

原文章由 ho_fish 於 08-5-23 00:18 發表
我諗揀學校最緊要係間學校啱唔啱自己小朋友既性格, 同埋啱唔啱家長既理念, 千祈唔好人地話好就去考, 最好o係去參加學校攪既開放日等等既活動, 去瞭解下間學校同校長。

去朗誦比賽同坐唔定o係兩樣野黎架, 坐唔定同跳 ...

始終俾錢去讀間band 2 學校就真係唔明解

作者: Eunismom 時間: 08-5-29 23:23 標題: 回覆 #11 tty2908 的文章

培僑好似同你有d過折喎..嘻.!!!

作者: tty2908 時間: 08-5-30 12:13

原文章由 Eunismom 於 08-5-29 23:23 發表
培僑好似同你有d過折喎..嘻.!!!

冇. 純萃以事論事啫. 俾得錢去報直資梗係揀間好D嘅唔好斷送佢一生. 唔係不如等大抽博間 band 1 免費嘅好過.

作者: christf 時間: 08-5-30 12:13

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: kyliema2006 時間: 08-5-30 15:34

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 12:13 發表
Dear all

(Note that my friend also said that the class disciplines at CKY and 優才, which also claim to adopt new style of teaching, are similar to that of 培僑)

祇要是蔡繼有的家長就知道，它班裡的秩序並不鬆散。

作者: edea 時間: 08-5-30 16:48

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 12:13 發表
After the visit, my friend and two other parents who visited the school at the same time totally felt disappointed and had no confident on those schools which claimed to adopt so called "new style" of education. (Note that my friend also said that the class disciplines at CKY and 優才, which also claim to adopt new style of teaching, are similar to that of 培僑)

If my friend's description on the class discipline was accurate, I don't think 培僑 knows how to educate the students. I totally disagreed that "new style of teaching" doesn't require good class discipline.

christf:

I raise a serious objection on your irresponsible comments on 優才.  What you say is hearsay from your friend but you did not witness it yourself.  This is the second time you comment on 優才 with out any substantial evidence.  I hope you can show some respect to other schools although you may not agree with their style.

My child goes to 優才 and I stay in the school every morning until the bell ring.  I do not find any problem on discipline of the classes.  Teachers walk around to ensure the discpline is fine.  Whenever some children cry (i.e. forgetting to do their homework or having little arguments), teacher notice very quickly and come over to comfort them.

I see things with my own eyes.

I do not comment on other schools if I don't see things myself.

Please be fair!

Thanks and best regards,
edea

作者: christf 時間: 08-5-30 16:57

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: christf 時間: 08-5-30 17:06

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: edea 時間: 08-5-30 17:13

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 16:57 發表
I have said very clearly that I haven't witnessed the class disciplines of those schools I mentioned by myself. I just quote exactly what I have heard from my friend. She have witnesses by herself ab ...

如果沒有親眼目睹就把別的學校指名道姓寫出來是很不負責任吧! 就算你說是聽回來, 也對別家學校付出的努力做成負面影響了.
或者你覺得我是over react, 但我卻覺得你是太輕率了.

何必要拉其他學校下水呢? 這個topic是講培僑, 不如只討論培僑吧.

作者: christf 時間: 08-5-30 17:23

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: edea 時間: 08-5-30 17:36

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 17:23 發表
Oh! What are your own "心態"!!

Comment on other schools is ok but once touching your beloved school, it is totally forbidden!!!

My friend's unhappy experience in PuiKui caused her to have a bad feel ...

你最初的發表並未有請讀優才或cky的家長分享喎?你只是引述你朋友的批評. 我始終不明白你有何必要指明道姓講優才和cky? 我在這裡也只是分享和澄清一下, 不想讓其他網友以為你"引述"的就是事實.

"I include her comments on other schools here so as to arouse sharing and discussion here and want others can clarify the situation here if my friend's comments were bias or incorrect! " -> 我現在就是正正上來澄清, 但你的回應 "Oh! What are your own "心態"!!Comment on other schools is ok but once touching your beloved school, it is totally forbidden!!!"就很輕佻和不尊重人. 我對閣下輕率的批評和無禮的回應深感遺憾.

[ 本文章最後由 edea 於 08-5-30 17:37 編輯 ]

作者: kyliema2006 時間: 08-5-30 18:14

大家不如息怒。雖然本人文筆拙劣，但都明白文字的影響力。若言大家採用一些比較中立的詞句，相信仍可表達其立場，但又不失個人風範。

Dear Christf,
過去一直亦有留意　閣下文章，發覺立場、觀點清晰，亦帶有強烈的個人風格。但是部份文章措詞過份激烈，甚至流於人身攻擊，就好像過份激動點。我不時覺得，以前電台的毓民及大班節目就最是精采。但要有如此效果，相信心血少些都接受不了。有時又會覺得，凡事豁達點，人亦會開心點。

我又在胡說八道了一大篇，請不要介意。

作者: HuiTung 時間: 08-5-31 00:40

<For most of the international schools in HK, the style of teaching and education is totally different from those of local schools but the class discipline are VERY VERY good.>

咁比唔公平. 講class discipline一定係那些行英式的lS, 嚴到嚇人. 係我朋友個仔讀緊呢d lS, 不要問我拿evidence.

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-5-31 01:29

其實呢單野, 是非黑白, 誰是誰非, 都好清楚, 我唸唔洗 " 清洪 " 出馬, 都好容易判啦, 嘻嘻。

<< After the visit, my friend and two other parents who visited the school at the same time totally felt disappointed and had no confident on those schools which claimed to adopt so called "new style" of education. Note that my friend also said that the class disciplines at CKY and 優才, which also claim to adopt new style of teaching, are similar to that of 培僑  >>

佢個 friend 唔係優才家長,  又冇睇過優才上堂情況; 淨係睇完另外一間學校, 唔太滿意, 氣憤之餘, 就簡單推論, 其他類似學校既 class disciplines, 都唔會好  - - 咁都得, 我唸唔洗我多解釋, 都睇倒呢個 logic 既嚴重錯誤。

舉個例子說明一下, 假如我覺得以前既"董特首", 做事拖拖拉拉, 唔夠決斷, 就推論話所有 University of Liverpool 既畢業生都係咁, 就大件事啦！！
( 注: 董生畢業于 University of Liverpool )

呢D俗語叫 { 一竹桿打一船人 }, 係唔岩既 !!!!!

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 16:57 發表
I have said very clearly that I haven't witnessed the class disciplines of those schools I mentioned by myself. I just quote exactly what I have heard from my friend. She have witnesses by herself ab ...

[ 本文章最後由中天英於 08-5-31 04:03 編輯 ]

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-5-31 01:52

呢位仁兄都話, 唔止佢自已冇親眼睇過優才上堂既情況, 連佢個 friend 都冇 - - 奇怪, 咁佢又憑D乜野响度對優才指手劃脚呢 !!!

優才有 < 開放教室 > 活動, 比D家長坐响課室, 親眼睇吓學生上堂既情況; 呢D堂係冇操練過, 係平日上既普通堂。

我 copy 幾段優才家長, 响上兩偭禮拜, 新鮮出爐, 岩岩觀完課既感受 :
-------------------------------------------------------
家長一 :

我都無去觀課,不過聽內子講上堂時小朋友好積極答問題. 佢話數學堂最震撼,人人舉手搶答. 中文堂男仔比較坐唔定同唔專心.不過老師問時又識答. 老師課堂控制得很好.一兩句就撥亂反正.

仲有老師話1A 班超級乖.

非常滿意

家長二 :

我觀課的兩堂是GT英文和普通話，上堂的秩序比想像中好，不過覺得時間有點緊迫，教學內容有點快。小朋友很開心，很主動答問題，整體滿意。

家長三 :

我都可收到大仔果班一個家長既email, 話去完觀課, 就更加肯定邏擇優才係岩既, 因為佢响堂上, 親眼見到D教師好有創意, 有耐心, 仲好愛錫D小朋友潻( 大意如比 )。

---------------------------------------------------------

原文章由 christf 於 08-5-30 16:57 發表
I have said very clearly that I haven't witnessed the class disciplines of those schools I mentioned by myself. I just quote exactly what I have heard from my friend. She have witnesses by herself ab ...

[ 本文章最後由中天英於 08-5-31 04:09 編輯 ]

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-5-31 02:45 標題: 七宗罪

愚弟認為, 呢位老兄, 可能最少有以下幾個問題,

1)  道聽塗說, 以訛傳訛
2)  屢犯屢錯, 死不認錯
3)  得罪人多, 稱呼人少
4)  大言不慚, 自以為是
5)  言而無物, 強詞奪理
6)  思想僵化, 永不改過
7)  言論偏激, 永無目的

原文章由 kyliema2006 於 08-5-30 18:14 發表
大家不如息怒。雖然本人文筆拙劣，但都明白文字的影響力。若言大家採用一些比較中立的詞句，相信仍可表達其立場，但又不失個人風範。

Dear Christf,
過去一直亦有留意　閣下文章，發覺立場、觀點清晰，亦帶有強烈的個人風格。 ...

[ 本文章最後由中天英於 08-6-2 00:28 編輯 ]

作者: 天瑜 時間: 08-6-1 08:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: 天瑜 時間: 08-6-1 09:08

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: lulu128 時間: 08-6-2 01:50

oh MY GOD!!!!!大家傾計ge, 不要動氣!!!
不如講返培橋la!!!

作者: christf 時間: 08-6-2 15:53

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: christf 時間: 08-6-2 16:12

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: christf 時間: 08-6-2 16:27

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: christf 時間: 08-6-2 16:43

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: christf 時間: 08-6-2 16:54

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: edea 時間: 08-6-2 18:05

原文章由 christf 於 08-6-2 16:54 發表
Hi kyliema2006,

Thank you for your kind advice.

I admitted that my wordings are sometimes too harsh but I only 人身攻擊 those who are really deserved.

There are so many narrow-minded BK parents her ...

人貴自重, 憑什麼你認為他人是deserve你人身攻擊呢?
你硬要把別人認同你的價值觀, 不附和你就是narrow-minded, 所以要受你評擊, 實在太野蠻了.

請大家不要花時間再和這種人爭辯了, 連基本尊重人也不會, 無謂和這種人再講下去.

[ 本文章最後由 edea 於 08-6-2 20:45 編輯 ]

作者: dabbycheung 時間: 08-6-2 19:49

誰是誰非，公道自在人心!!!!!!!!!

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-6-3 02:13

呢位老兄, 都有D優點既,

面皮夠厚

原文章由 christf 於 08-6-2 16:27 發表
You are really 愚弟

1)  道聽塗說, 以訛傳訛

- I have already explained how wrong this claim is.

2)  屢犯屢錯, 死不認錯

-  Please quote any of my mistake if you can.

3)  得罪人多, 稱呼 ...

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-6-3 02:37

多謝提醒, 岩岩睇番我本小一英文書, 先發覺老兄D英文, 眞係差得咁緊要,  可能得幼稚园水平咁。

就隨手搵一句黎睇吓,

"Yes, I admit this claim but I would like to extend a little bit more. I only 得罪 those stubborn but stupid guy like you"

- extend a little bit 係乜英文呀, 阿差都知應該用 elaborate 呢個  字呀
- stubborn but stupid guy, 冇眼睇, 點會咁寫呀,
  stubborn同stupid 係近義詞,  乜唔係 stubborn and stupid 咩？

老兄你不如叫令公子, 幫你睇吓 D 英文先啦 !!!!!

原文章由 christf 於 08-6-2 16:12 發表
***奇怪, 咁佢又憑D乜野响度對優才指手劃脚呢***

奇怪, 有誰响度對優才指手劃脚呢?

Do you know how to read English?

Maybe I can ask my boy to teach you English so that you will not be so stupid here tha ...

[ 本文章最後由中天英於 08-6-3 02:41 編輯 ]

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-6-3 02:54

"You are still not qualified to talk about "logic" in front of me!!"

眞係頭痕, 咁冇厘頭既說話都講得出, 都唔知好嬲定好笑。

潑婦駡街, 冇法啦, 同佢再講 logic 係冇用既

原文章由 christf 於 08-6-2 15:53 發表
You are still not qualified to talk about "logic" in front of me!!

**佢個 friend 唔係優才家長, 又冇睇過優才上堂情況; 淨係睇完另外一間學校, 唔太滿意, 氣憤之餘, 就簡單推論, 其他類似學校既 class discip ...

[ 本文章最後由中天英於 08-6-3 03:33 編輯 ]

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-6-3 02:57

原文章由 edea 於 08-6-2 18:05 發表

人貴自重, 憑什麼你認為他人是deserve你人身攻擊呢?
你硬要把別人認同你的價值觀, 不附和你就是narrow-minded, 所以要受你評擊, 實在太野蠻了.

請大家不要花時間再和這種人爭辯了, 連基本尊重人也不會, 無謂和這 ...

作者: 中天英 時間: 08-6-3 04:01

"There is no more fun in this thread and I don't want to educate them anymore."

呢位老兄都幾可憐, 好似無主孤魂咁, 响BK呢度又冇自已既地方落腳, 淨係四圍咁去撩交嗌, 仲以為咁樣好有 fun 潻 !!!!!!

雖然話 " 一樣米養百樣人 " , 但係呢種專門以扁低別人, 黎抬高自已既品性, 都幾可憐。

原文章由 christf 於 08-6-2 16:54 發表
Hi kyliema2006,

Thank you for your kind advice.

I admitted that my wordings are sometimes too harsh but I only 人身攻擊 those who are really deserved.

There are so many narrow-minded BK parents her ...

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)