教育王國

標題: any comment of Victoria Primary? [打印本頁]

作者: ckbee 時間: 07-8-30 12:16 標題: any comment of Victoria Primary?

1 what is the ratio of student and teacher?
2 are there many homework every day?
3 what is the activities at school?
4 are all subjects taught in english, except chinese/putonghua class?
5 is there any other langauge taught at school?

thank you

作者: neo媽 時間: 07-11-5 08:13

1 what is the ratio of student and teacher?------每班30人, 雙班主任
2 are there many homework every day?------2-3樣
3 what is the activities at school?------要錢/免費都有, 要錢既選擇比較多, 但我覺得都算多選擇
4 are all subjects taught in english, except chinese/putonghua class?------除P.E/MUSIC/I.T會有廣東話外, 大至上都係英文&國語
5 is there any other langauge taught at school?------NO

作者: wakeup07 時間: 07-11-28 00:38

原文章由 neo媽 於 07-11-5 08:13 硐表
1 what is the ratio of student and teacher?------每班30人, 雙班主任
2 are there many homework every day?------2-3樣
3 what is the activities at school?------要錢/免費都有, 要錢既選擇比較多, 但我覺得都 ...

do u think it's worth to put your kid in Victoria Primary school ?coz their tuition is pretty expensive...

also, do u mind if you can tell me why you pick this school rather than others??

作者: citadel 時間: 08-8-3 20:50

原文章由 wakeup07 於 07-11-28 00:38 發表

do u think it's worth to put your kid in Victoria Primary school ?coz their tuition is pretty expensive...

also, do u mind if you can tell me why you pick this school rather than others??

本人現居於黃竹坑，有幸有機會接觸到該校的學生，資想發表一下對該校的片面觀感：
首先，該校的校車司機每早都會高速穿越黃竹垃巴士總站，過程完全沒有減速或轉波，就是比出名"飛車"的"小巴佬"還要厲害，傷害到途人事小，萬一於路口與其他重型車輛有甚麼碰撞的話，車上的那些學童就不是更無辜了嗎？
其次，一些就讀於中學部，自行乘搭巴士(城巴72A/75號路線)上下課的同學，其表現就真是不敢恭維！高聲於巴士上講粗口(不論男女)，大聲叫囂，與外界的Band 3學生無異！還有一次有某位操上海口音普通話的中年"阿Sir"，於72A巴士上被一群女生叫嚷著：「阿Sir，你幾時黎我屋企家訪啫？」、「你一個人住有冇"食自己"！(可能是知道這位"阿SIR"對廣東話的認識不深)」之類不堪入耳的說話...！我相信該校應加強訓輔工作，切勿被一小撮的壞學生影響校譽！

作者: Grapes 時間: 08-8-5 18:01

Dear Citadel,

Is it really a case? I have just enrolled my girl to study in this secondary school. Oh, my god!

原文章由 citadel 於 08-8-3 20:50 發表

本人現居於黃竹坑，有幸有機會接觸到該校的學生，資想發表一下對該校的片面觀感：
首先，該校的校車司機每早都會高速穿越黃竹垃巴士總站，過程完全沒有減速或轉波，就是比出名"飛車"的"小巴佬"還要厲害，傷害到途人事小，萬一於路 ...

作者: samelsaho 時間: 08-8-6 19:23 標題: 回覆 #1 Grapes 的文章

係真的，我曾經到學校參觀，當我和一班家長入lift時剛巧有6-7個中學生出lift，他們出lift時見到我們一班家長，好冇禮貌的說 "嘩!mud咁多人嘅 "，其中幾個重梳了個龍珠髮型，至於講粗口就早已聽聞，可能係好多中學生都是收外來的，所以質素有參次！

作者: neo媽 時間: 08-8-7 08:35

咁都真係幾驚喎

老實講, 我自己就未親眼見過, 有特別節目時接送呀仔都好少見到中學生, 都見過有打扮好"潮"既學生, 但可能係學校, 未聽見有粗口, 而同站等校巴的都有7-8個中學生, 打扮行為ok, 普通中學生一個!!
但點解中學生會多收外來!? 唔係通常直升的嗎?

原文章由 samelsaho 於 08-8-6 19:23 發表
係真的，我曾經到學校參觀，當我和一班家長入lift時剛巧有6-7個中學生出lift，他們出lift時見到我們一班家長，好冇禮貌的說 "嘩!mud咁多人嘅 "，其中幾個重梳了個龍珠髮型，至於講粗口就早已聽聞，可能係好多中學生都是收外來的，所 ...

作者: samelsaho 時間: 08-8-8 01:29 標題: 回覆 #1 neo媽的文章

因為VSA在０７年搬到新校後中學學位增多了，所以收了不少外來生，至於講粗口，有一朋友的囝囝轉到VSA中學後學了不少粗口．

作者: Grapes 時間: 08-8-8 10:55

Given the poor quality of students, how can the school charge so high school fee ($7800 per month!)?

作者: jjhwong 時間: 08-9-25 11:50

我都係住南區. 係我座building有好多小朋友讀呢間學校,就算係小學生都好冇禮貌同埋好寸(中學生就

),可能有啲錢啩!

作者: Benson 時間: 08-10-10 11:48

最好自己去瞭解清楚, 難道願意付那麼高學費的父母真的那麼蠢?

作者: hoboy 時間: 08-10-16 13:21

中學生我就唔清楚, 因為收左好多外來生.

維記小朋友係活潑d, 但我見仔仔既同學品行都ok喎. 而學校都好注重學生的品德. 會唔會係個別例子呢

作者: mat媽 時間: 09-9-4 12:24

老實說, 現在有那間學校沒有不說粗口的學生? 沒有冇禮貌的學生?

作者: LSC431 時間: 09-9-5 19:44

原帖由 mat媽 於 09-9-4 12:24 發表
老實說, 現在有那間學校沒有不說粗口的學生? 沒有冇禮貌的學生?

agree !!!!:D :D :D

作者: TomatoCat 時間: 09-9-28 09:32

U are right, but to what extent only. There is very low chance of u seeing such cases in schools as spcc, dbs, mcs....
There are too many such students in the secondary session. Those in lower primany should be much better because they came straight fm their kindergartens, and more controllable.
Go to their open day if u have a chance, and u will know more! Their open day last year is a fun-fair instead of letting u know more about the school policies, or performance of students.
The school itself is well-facilitated but takes time to fine-tune and go on the right track. I am a fan of Vict Kinder, but have reservations with VSA for the time being.

原帖由 mat媽 於 09-9-4 12:24 發表
老實說, 現在有那間學校沒有不說粗口的學生? 沒有冇禮貌的學生?

作者: samelsaho 時間: 09-9-29 20:27 標題: 回覆 1# TomatoCat 的文章

07/08有177位維記畢業生揀升去VSA，但今年(08/09)就只有104位！

作者: wan^kam^ 時間: 09-9-29 23:09

why so high drop out rate? is it becoz of the high school fee but average teaching standard?

原帖由 samelsaho 於 09-9-29 20:27 發表
07/08有177位維記畢業生揀升去VSA，但今年(08/09)就只有104位！

作者: samelsaho 時間: 09-10-1 00:29 標題: 回覆 1# wan^kam^ 的文章

唔知怎樣講，太長篇了！

08/09年我認識比了按金的家長當中，有約８成放棄了學位，因考到其他學校學位(即使係二線學校)，即係說家長只將VSA做back-up！

作者: mcheung1 時間: 09-10-7 23:19

提示: 作者被禁止或刪除內容自動屏蔽

作者: feifei614 時間: 09-10-27 20:09

請問幼稚園不是讀維記,容易考入維小嗎?

作者: poopooh 時間: 09-10-28 13:06

There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?

原帖由 samelsaho 於 09-10-1 00:29 發表
唔知怎樣講，太長篇了！

08/09年我認識比了按金的家長當中，有約８成放棄了學位，因考到其他學校學位(即使係二線學校)，即係說家長只將VSA做back-up！ ...

作者: sabmar 時間: 09-10-31 14:14

原帖由 poopooh 於 09-10-28 13:06 發表
There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?

a boy living above my flat is from this primary school. he is very naughty and use foul language since he was still in victoria kinder. the parents are a middle class working couple, willing to pay the ralatively high school fee but apparently do not care about the kid's moral development. my overall impression about this primary school, by observing this boy and his parents, is extremely bad.

作者: poopooh 時間: 09-11-1 16:15

Extreme case does not reprsent the all. I think that is the beauty of statistics.
Being a guest teacher, I attended my daughter's class in few occassions ... there were about 20+ students. None of them was noted as ...so call" naughty". Every boys and girls were adorable and they could follow the rule one by one in asking questions.

That is the good experience for me ... that can share with you all.

作者: Yau_Cheung 時間: 09-11-27 14:00

http://www.victoria.edu.hk/nursery-&-kindergarten/eng/nursery_20.html

2007-08共683名維幼畢業生，177人最後選讀VSA (25.9%)；
2008-09共553名維幼畢業生，104人最後選讀VSA (18.8%)。

數字可反映VSA受歡迎度正下跌。為甚麼會下跌呢? 我相信消費者係精明既！

原帖由 poopooh 於 09-10-28 13:06 發表
There is bias in sampling. Statistic signicant ?

[ 本帖最後由 Yau_Cheung 於 09-11-27 14:04 編輯 ]

作者: hoboy 時間: 09-11-30 22:20

跟左VSA 5年, 我開始見到IB既成效. 學生已經可以自己上網搵資料, 同自己既組員一起計劃, 分工合作, 完成group project. 仲可以寫到script 做個有板有眼既presentation. 家長一d都唔洗幫手. 呢d技巧全部都係書本上學唔到, 而係慢慢一年一年咁浸返黎. 真係好開心!

作者: anitapooh 時間: 10-5-4 23:37

原帖由 hoboy 於 09-11-30 22:20 發表
跟左VSA 5年, 我開始見到IB既成效. 學生已經可以自己上網搵資料, 同自己既組員一起計劃, 分工合作, 完成group project. 仲可以寫到script 做個有板有眼既presentation. 家長一d都唔洗幫手. 呢d技巧全部都係書本上學 ...

碎料咋 wor

作者: lala_619 時間: 10-5-14 23:24

I think most of you are using only one example to represent the majority of VSA students, which is very unfair to those who perform very well. Also, I found it to be rather funny that someone actually believe students from popular schools do not speak foul language. The use of foul language is a part of adolence path. Thus, please do not blame the other students in influencing your child, think about why is your child so weak that he/she could not make the right choice. After all, teenagers are jus kids, you wouldn't expect adults to be perfect, then why would you expect kids to be perfect?
Come on, be fair...

作者: fatgoat 時間: 10-6-9 12:28

其實，2008年金融海嘯會唔會部份解釋得到2008-2009年數字下降的原因呢？

原帖由 Yau_Cheung 於 09-11-27 14:00 發表
http://www.victoria.edu.hk/nursery-&-kindergarten/eng/nursery_20.html

2007-08共683名維幼畢業生，177人最後選讀VSA (25.9%)；
2008-09共553名維幼畢業生，104人最後選讀VSA (18.8%)。

數字可反映VSA受歡迎度正下跌 ...

[ 本帖最後由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 16:04 編輯 ]

作者: fatgoat 時間: 10-6-9 12:28

deleted by user.

[ 本帖最後由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 12:29 編輯 ]

作者: cherubic 時間: 10-6-9 13:49

The comments on VSA in BK has been hijacked by some users who apparently are not parents of VSA's students. Whether their comment is geniuely made or not is always unclear to me. I think those having an interest in this school should visit the school directly and see the truth.

The real reason why there is a big difference between these two academic years is because in 2007-08, the school offered a place to all applicants from the kindergarten. As a result, they need to arrange 7 classses (instead of the usual 5 classess). In 2008-09, they screen students so as to maintain the usual 5 classes in a form. This can be seen from the number of classes in each form, only P.2 (the 2007-08 case) has 7 classess whilst all others has 5 classes.

原帖由 fatgoat 於 10-6-9 12:28 發表
2008年10月金融海嘯恒指10676，2009年3月匯豐跌到落$33；當時全世界0既人大家都睇唔通前景，銀行根本唔肯放數，盤生意賺緊錢都隨時比人call loan. 我相信當時的氣氛/背景絕對可以大部份解釋到2008-2009年數字下降的原因。

...

[ 本帖最後由 cherubic 於 10-6-9 13:59 編輯 ]

作者: yyvenus 時間: 10-6-9 21:33

P1 have 6 classes this year (2010-2011).

作者: aliceBB 時間: 10-7-21 00:52

我是維幼K2的家長, 我剛剛5月參觀完維小的全校assembly, 負責介紹我們的老師話會定期有assembly讓不同年級不同班別上台表演. 今次我們看到其中一個是一年級演講關於星球, 一半同學(10幾人)用流利的英文, 另一半用流利普通話介紹坐太空船到達不同的星球, 令我覺得嘆為觀止.

語言真是維小的極大優點. 從尋找之中學習, 活學活用.

作者: IJai 時間: 10-12-3 03:34

VSA is just too far for my kid -.-

作者: irene_the_pooh 時間: 11-9-5 21:38

如果有小朋友o係幼稚園已經講粗口，我估唔係邊間幼稚園既問題，而係佢父母既問題！

作者: jpjp 時間: 12-2-4 23:35

我覺得你們的意見都頗中立,想問問:
1.若果我的堂哥的家庭中文水平不錯,因為他們兩夫婦都是在高中的中國文學不錯,而堂哥是港人但用普通話教中文。根據之前看到的網頁D家長說學生的說聽英文好native,但寫就多grammer/spelling錯,是真嗎?是相比local school/ IS?
2.因堂哥沒請菲,老人家湊,不多說英文的,咁佢想小朋友將來說好D, 要寫得好,就趁學校功課不多,叫佢狂看圖書及寫下日記,是否OK呢?
3.是否全部英文科由鬼/ABC教呢?每日多少個鐘?課程是怎樣的?用什麼教材?
4.另外,看以上中文的課程/練習好似有好多保存中國文化的內容,好似不錯,不知是否由小一開始?量多嗎?D小朋友說普通話OK嗎?小息時/EVENT,D學生用什麼話多?
5.有些人說小朋友讀到小三都不懂X/除數,又話2/3練習到學期尾都未做過,是真嗎?
6.若咁誇張,不明白為何這麼多人用這麼多錢讀。
7.若想小朋友在黃金時間練好三文兩語,之後想轉回LOCAL中上上的學校,為什麼難?怎可以容易D?若中上上的學校見其英普說得下,平時在家給小朋友練習,都應該不太差吧,咁樣是否容易在小四時LOCAL插班呢?還是在中學自行派位時選BAND2頭資助學校IN呢,因IN時好學校只看IN時的英文和對時事的認識呢?
問題較多,希望各位比多D意見,謝謝!!

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)