- 在線時間
- 825 小時
- 最後登錄
- 19-11-16
- 國民生產力
- 12
- 附加生產力
- 7069
- 貢獻生產力
- 0
- 註冊時間
- 07-1-18
- 閱讀權限
- 10
- 帖子
- 3280
- 主題
- 9
- 精華
- 0
- 積分
- 10361
- UID
- 121214
|
lawsonmoon 發表於 14-7-29 15:18
我係北美時IB係小眾, 尖子大部分只會揀AP。HK漸流行,我預見到陸續會出現補習班,IB顧問和學校放水等新聞。IB ...
Not the same now. More and more tier one universities are seeing IBDP as a preferred curriculum. Some may even start to exempt students from taking SAT I (with English A). I think it is only a start. I also think IBDP should not be mainstream as it is too demanding. Not that only the content is hard, but the whole curriculum is demanding: TOK, EE, CAS, etc. Not everyone has the mentality to handle all these thing. So not sure whether more and more IBDP schools is a good thing. I think it will only make the mediocre students even more frustrated.
But regarding 放水, I am not too worried. In any system, teachers can 放水, but universities will will find ways to pick students they want . Honestly, with standard tests like AP (exam not classes) or SAT, it is still hard to say whether a student is really competent. AP and SAT exams are exams and it is hard to tell whether a student is really good/bad since luck may mean a lot, especially with the high proportion of MC questions.
I have spoken with a professor of a university in the US. He said they (the department) kept track of the high school grades and performance of admitted students (including those from foreign high schools). For example, high school A and high school B both have students going to their department, both with 90% (high school grades). But in university, high school B students perform a lot better than high school A. Then in future admissions, they will tend to add "bonus points" to students in high school B.
This may still not exactly be fair. But I think universities would certainly try their best to ensure they get the best students, and not those that try to take short cut.
|
|