請問國際小學最平學費係邊間呢?

ACIC

I don't know if you live on the HK island.  KCIS and Korean International School are both quite good and charging reasonable school fees.  KCIS is getting more competitive now, and KIS is not as they mostly serve Koreans.  Both don't require a denbenture.  Both don't have a proven track record of where their students will go to for universities as they are very new compared to esf.

竹葉青

尚宫大人,多謝你咁詳細資料,真係好吸引,可惜我太遲先知e間學校,人地都in晒,不過我都有打去問下有冇第二輪,佢叫我可以而家交表都得,我現在為有等面試啦.我填張form都有寫明問小朋友多用咩語言,重要好詳細咁要填英文係1-7(1係最少講,7係最多)咁填寫,就連普通話同廣東話都要寫1-7呀,都唔知難唔難考呀.不過點都要試下喇,因為呀仔只得聖三一係手咋.我仔又成日衰多口,成日口多多搭咀,問長問短,攪到佢講英文點好點外籍控都無用呀!激死.

原帖由 尚宮大人 於 09-12-12 02:29 發表

:) 「宏信書院」係依照小朋友的母語（英文或廣東話）黎分 Group 做 Interview 架。我記得我帶小朋友去面試個陣，有好多「非華籍」小朋友，白人、黑人都有，當然佢地係英文組面試啦。


仲有，小一有 3 班，只收 87 人。「宏信」 ...

竹葉青

係呀,我仔只係英文好好,但係普通話只係識唱歌仔咋!咁就死梗囉.

原帖由 尚宮大人 於 09-12-14 18:39 發表

:) 我唔想比壓力小朋友，所以我唔會問番小朋友學校面試的內容，但係佢係 1st 同 2nd 面試後，都係好開心出來，我諗唔會太難呀。但有d 家長話，面試時，因為自己小朋友普通話不濟，所以去左 Waiting List。 ...

Mighty

尚宮大人
宏信真的可以行IB？　　我同這学校没有利益衝突、只是好奇問問、之前SHATIN有一間在入学SEMINAR時都是説行IB的、幾年後結果告「吹」、当然当年相信IB的家長実在気「奮」、但只能説句奈何。　　行IB不容易、就説是対有歴史的ESF也是難事、所以我対宏信説的有保留。　当然IB也不是妙単霊薬。　　

nintendo

原帖由 尚宮大人 於 09-12-16 09:34 發表

你堤及的學校，想必係「浸大王錦輝」。有家長曾向升學專家趙榮德先生，問及有關依間學校。佢都話依間學校的人事更替，上至校董會，下至教師，都好唔隱定。因此，人事的變更可能或多或少，影響到學校原先訂立的方向，所以放棄追求 IB ...

It is quite unbelievable to see that a potential "client" is already defending the school.

I do not see the needs to drag another school into the discussion. Whether another school have done it successfully has nothing to do with 宏信. I do not know whether Mighty was talking about Wong Kam Fai, but she never provided any name. In any care, if there were indeed personel problem at Wong Kam Fai, it might just happen too at 宏信 too. Who knows. The school has not even started operating yet.

The main point is that, Mighty's comments was merely on the "faith" parents should have in a new school. There have been quite a few schools that promised to provide IB. They have used the IB curriculum as a marketing tool to promote the image of the school. Yet, in the end, once the school runs in, the management claims that they are no longer interested in further pursuing the IB accreditations; of course, providing a full lists reasons explaining themselves. Like Mighty said, IB is of course not the best path. But the thing is we have seen broken promises. She is probably merely asking people to be careful.

Go to Page One and grab any Marketing 101 books. You need it.

PS. I would rather not waste my time listening to Mr Chiu. He lacks experience and mindset in international curriculum.

[ 本帖最後由 nintendo 於 09-12-16 12:07 編輯 ]

oooray

原帖由 nintendo 於 09-12-16 12:05 發表



It is quite unbelievable to see that a potential "client" is already defending the school.

I do not see the needs to drag another school into the discussion. Whether another school have done it su ...

Agree.
Any one of IS parents can have more precise and concise comments on IS than those so called "Expert".
I am always amazed why newspaper reporters like consulting those "expert" comments on IS.
They merely stand on the Earth and look at the Moon by binoculars (toys only); pretend to be a Outer Space expert and then Bla bla bla .......

mattsmum

well, no body defend those local school who is already IB credited. but some defend those not yet IB credited.

原帖由 oooray 於 09-12-16 12:32 發表

Agree.
Any one of IS parents can have more precise and concise comments on IS than those so called "Expert".
I am always amazed why newspaper reporters like consulting those "expert" comments on IS. ...

nintendo

原帖由 mattsmum 於 09-12-16 14:05 發表
well, no body defend those local school who is already IB credited. but some defend those not yet IB credited.

維護學校冇問題
不過學校只在收生階段, 唔好講話"業績", 根本都未"開張"
MIGHTY 只係帶出一個問題比家長留意下
甚至唔算係質疑學校
但竟然有 "家長" 咁緊張幫口澄清
我真係覺得好怪

oooray

原帖由 mattsmum 於 09-12-16 14:05 發表
well, no body defend those local school who is already IB credited. but some defend those not yet IB credited.

In my mind, IB is not a halo that we don't need to differentiate IB/non-IB schools and then simply conclude that which is better.

oooray

原帖由 尚宮大人 於 09-12-16 14:59 發表

其實，大家都係討論下。樓主的問題係：「請問國際小學最平學費係邊間呢？」我都想比自己仔女，讀國際學校，但國際學校動不動就 10 幾萬 1 年，真係好吃力。


我只不過想話比樓主知，有 d 直資「一條龍」英文學校，係唔錯的選擇。 ...

I agree that Best school does not exist. There should be one good school best for our children and one is enough.
So, everybody should have their best choice.
DBS is good but does not mean it must be good for your son.
Take it easy.

Mighty

不管尚宮大人是DEFENDING　THE SCHOL　OR　SELLING THE　SCHOOL,家長一定不会只聴一個網友意見、便信定学校是好的。　

我只是覚得選択学校不応従是否行IB来決定。

看竹葉青是認識直資学校的、相信選校応該没問題。

Share

收政府資助係唔可以行ＩＢ，因為ＩＢ係外國的教學系統。

當年某小學（直資）放棄行ＩＢ就是這個原因。那時因為我個仔的關係，　我收到那間小學的通知信，講明教育局的方針（sorry, no offense)，所以 直資可以行ＩＢ？？？？？？？

樓主check 清楚好Ｄ？？？

[ 本帖最後由 Share 於 09-12-16 19:23 編輯 ]

samelsaho

hi尚宮大人,

請問「宏信書院」是否已有IB認證？還是只是聲稱會行IB？如果只是聲稱會行IB，入讀的學生家長都要有心理準備，學校可能會行唔成IB！免得到時後悔！

"小一有 3 班，只收 87 人" - 即是每班有２９人，都幾大班，而家好多官津校都係得２５人！

nintendo

跟據政府網頁, DSS 係要提供本地課程的

http://www.edb.gov.hk/index.aspx?nodeID=1475&langno=2

"參加資格

所有資助中學及小學均可申請加入直資計劃。辦學團體亦可向政府申請分配校舍，作為開辦直資學校之用。參加直資計劃的學校會以本地直資學校的模式運作，主要提供為本地學生而設的課程，準備他們應考本地公開試。"

我對 LPC 和啟思唔熟, 唔知點解可以例外. 但的確過去係有學校因為收了政府資助, 政府要求佢地要提供本地課程, 而唔再申請 IB. 當然, 香港政府經常變, 亦有可能我記錯.

就當係我理解錯, 宏信係何而搞 IB.
一日未批, 都唔好咁老定.
申請 IB 唔係講下就得, IBO 對校舍, 課程, 師資, 教學方式等都有特定要求. 學校高層如果冇 IB 經驗, 我覺得唔樂觀. 人地 ISF 無論財力和才力都唔少野, 但都要多番微調課程, 多次被 IBO 觀察和重新審查, 先申請成功.
好佩服有網友對宏信咁有信心.

其實, 反正 IB 亦唔係最好的課程, 搞唔成亦冇乜大不了. 我只係希望家長們諗清楚. 如果一心為 IB 課程考宏信, 但過兩年學校又話唔搞, 咁就真係會失望.  

考學校唔係買菜, 係對孩子的將來的投資.
考新學校尤如買樓花, 有一定的風險.
售樓書而家都話唔可以 "老吹".
唔知新學校貨不對辦, 家長可唔可以向消委會投訴.

[ 本帖最後由 nintendo 於 09-12-16 22:07 編輯 ]