教育王國

標題: 九真offer報喜區 [打印本頁]

作者: Anpanmi 時間: 16-12-1 21:41 標題: 九真offer報喜區

有無人收到offer?

作者: marcoli8 時間: 16-12-1 22:14

Anpanmi 發表於 16-12-1 21:41
有無人收到offer?

昨天已收到k1 offer了!

作者: cheamuimui 時間: 16-12-1 22:49 標題: 引用：有無人收到offer?

原帖由 Anpanmi 於 16-12-01 發表
有無人收到offer?

am offer K1

作者: Anpanmi 時間: 16-12-1 23:23

提示: 該帖被管理員或版主屏蔽

作者: dreamdream081 時間: 16-12-2 00:29 標題: 引用：Quote:Anpanmi+發表於+16-12-1+21:41+有無

本帖最後由 dreamdream081 於 16-12-2 00:37 編輯

原帖由 Anpanmi 於 16-12-01 發表
有意交流pm我！

作者: dreamdream081 時間: 16-12-2 00:32 標題: 回覆：dreamdream081 的帖子

本帖最後由 dreamdream081 於 16-12-2 00:35 編輯

.

作者: Kwunchunlai 時間: 16-12-2 18:32

Am offer

作者: Antzho 時間: 16-12-5 12:12

K1 AM offer!

作者: sionmisa 時間: 16-12-5 12:57

K1 AM offer ....X 2

作者: Cecilai 時間: 16-12-5 13:03

Anpanmi 發表於 16-12-1 21:41
有無人收到offer?

K1am offer

作者: Cecilai 時間: 16-12-5 13:04

Anpanmi 發表於 16-12-1 21:41
有無人收到offer?

Yes am k1

作者: ychan12 時間: 16-12-5 13:54

大家會留位嗎？

作者: marcoli8 時間: 16-12-5 14:20

ychan12 發表於 16-12-5 13:54
大家會留位嗎？

會

作者: damn 時間: 16-12-5 15:18

ychan12 發表於 16-12-5 13:54
大家會留位嗎？

NO. The more I ask about the school, the more I don't like about it.

作者: baybaycat 時間: 16-12-5 15:54

K1 pm offer

作者: kwaisoso 時間: 16-12-5 16:14

回覆 damn 的帖子

可以講解下嗎？

作者: kwaisoso 時間: 16-12-5 16:15

damn 發表於 16-12-5 15:18
NO. The more I ask about the school, the more I don't like about it.

可以講解下嗎？

作者: damn 時間: 16-12-5 17:41

kwaisoso 發表於 16-12-5 16:15
可以講解下嗎？

I actually visited the schools or called the schools to compare their teaching materials.What I find out is very disappointing. T The textbooks that they are using is what SC is using for their Nursery class. They don't even have Phonics for k1 and they have not decided which phonics system to use in K2 yet when their schools is starting in just a few months. Their Chinese books are at least one level lower than SC. true light is way tooooooo easy comparing to the other schools maybe because they are through train and they don't need to worry too much about the children's level?!
In conclusion true light is not even in my consideration!
I don't think TL kindergarten kids can excel over the 3 years comparing to some other kindergartens because their teaching resources are toooooo easy!

作者: dmchu 時間: 16-12-6 09:59

本帖最後由 dmchu 於 16-12-6 10:00 編輯

damn 發表於 16-12-5 17:41
I actually visited the schools or called the schools to compare their teaching materials.What I fin ...

Hello damn,
Thank you for the information shared here.
That actually worries me as the syllabus seems 2 levels down vs what my kid is learning at PN now.
She is learning Letterland really fast in PN class - and the school will proceed to spelling patterns in K1.
If the above is true, I think TL might only start Phonics in K2 - which is a bit late.

I just called the school, asking similar questions.
But the lady handling the call didn't reveal any information regarding syllabus or materials used - saying they could not reveal until EDB approves.
Upon registration they will give more information regarding Parent-school meeting schedule, which should be approximately May next year.

Somehow I think KLN TL is gradually improving.
They moved onto EMI in Primary and 75% EMI in Secondary School since 2010 and 2011.
By looking at their University Admission Rate, it is on an up-trend in these 2 years.
I hope, if they haven't decided up the syllabus yet, will strengthen competitiveness of children when finalizing it.

Honestly I think TL primary can still be a very good back up, considering we have no extra points for Discretionary Places Admission Stage.

作者: pig_mug 時間: 17-3-3 01:50

請問大家知唔知而家學校攪成點？校舍装修好未？早2個月去開九龍城咪去睇吓囉，但好似連大厦外圍都未攪定（不過唔知有冇去錯），唔知依家點呢？
學校好似咩都冇哂聲氣咁嘅。

作者: penp0319 時間: 17-3-5 23:45

dmchu 發表於 16-12-6 09:59
Hello damn,
Thank you for the information shared here.
That actually worries me as the syllabus see ...

路過！k2 start phonics 係正常！k1 太細開始太細！

作者: dmchu 時間: 17-3-6 15:07

penp0319 發表於 17-3-5 23:45
路過！k2 start phonics 係正常！k1 太細開始太細！

我小朋友現在PN已經學習Phonics，我覺得成效好像不錯。
比如我隨意問Mo...Mo...Monkey Belongs to?
小朋友會答到M，問其他字不太複雜一般都會答到。

我不是說早學代表好，畢竟學習了A很可能會代表B會被忽略。
我只是覺得到了K2又重覆學一次好像有點兒浪費。

作者: penp0319 時間: 17-3-7 22:05

dmchu 發表於 17-3-6 15:07
我小朋友現在PN已經學習Phonics，我覺得成效好像不錯。
比如我隨意問Mo...Mo...Monkey Belongs to?
小朋友 ...

PN 已學phonics!

作者: mankitmathew1 時間: 17-5-18 20:28

請問有無K2家長? 想入group討論。tks !

作者: Anpanmi 時間: 17-5-18 20:38

mankitmathew1 發表於 17-5-18 20:28
請問有無K2家長? 想入group討論。tks !

有個大group
Pm me pls

作者: baby-papa 時間: 17-5-18 21:36

dmchu 發表於 17-3-6 15:07
我小朋友現在PN已經學習Phonics，我覺得成效好像不錯。
比如我隨意問Mo...Mo...Monkey Belongs to?
小朋友 ...

我是路過的，我認為單憑有無Phonics 學去決定間幼稚園質素是不理想（至少我不會這樣考慮），即使小學面試也不會問有無上過Phonics。

我認識很多朋友她們會考英文及高考擁A，英語會話超流利但幼稚園時期完全沒有學過Phonics，她們都話是父母平時建立了英語生活語景訓練出信心來的。

利申：我姪女是九真出來的，她幼稚園沒有學Phonics, 考DSE 英文5*

以上是我的愚見，請見諒。

作者: dmchu 時間: 17-5-18 23:46

本帖最後由 dmchu 於 17-5-18 23:46 編輯

baby-papa 發表於 17-5-18 21:36
我是路過的，我認為單憑有無Phonics 學去決定間幼稚園質素是不理想（至少我不會這樣考慮），即使小學面試 ...

一所幼稚園質素如何，有許多因素，包括師資、各項資源投放等等，課程是其中一個環節。
但我本身贊成幼稚園階段學習PHONICS，因為可以盡早掌握英語發音。
此外發音的一般法則掌握了，對於日後SPELLING幫助不少。

現在很多幼稚園都會教PHONICS，幾乎變成了HYGIENE FACTOR。
我上面提到的反而是N班經已學了基礎部份，到K班「重新出發」的話會有點浪費而已。

我當年都沒學PHONICS。到中學才學IPA，純粹係當興趣班，畢生受用。

歡迎光臨教育王國 (/)